1 |
強制性利益仲裁之博奕理論分析 / A Game Theoretic Analysis of Compulsory Interest Arbitration辜柏宏, Ku, Po-Hung Unknown Date (has links)
從個體決策制定(decision-making)的角度觀之,參與談判、創造合約,是一種既可學習處世又可瞭解「人性」的雙贏作為。個體在歷經集體談判的互動(interaction)過程後,所獲得的償值(payoffs),也許會超越前述的期望效益;然而,對於「急需達成協議卻失敗者」或「被迫達成協議者」而言,因為無法如願以償,付出與耗損的心力,往住令人無法說服自己──這樣的結果符合吾人之期望(expectancy)──於是,個體理性(individual rationality)與集體理性(collective rationality)間的弔詭(paradox)又乍然若現。
仲裁人以中立第三者的角色,受理談判參與者的爭議,裁決爭議各造的償值,是聯結個體與集體理性的制度設計之一。然而,不同的仲裁制度所依循的特定仲裁程序,及其所隱含的偏差(bias),對交付仲裁的爭議各造及仲裁人決策模式所產生的影響,著實不容忽略。
本文的旨趣在於對仲裁制度及程序所隱含的偏差進行實驗比較,以博奕理論(game theory)為分析工具,來檢視下列三個變項所形成的二種關係:
一、在最終報價仲裁(final-offer arbitration)制度之下,仲裁人的特定偏好(preferences)對爭議兩造的影響,觀察的指標為爭議率及各造的報價策略;
二、不同仲裁制度及程序對仲裁人從事仲裁判斷之影響,觀察的指標為仲裁判斷分布(distribution of arbitration awards)。
本文的結論將藉由前述二種關係的檢證結果,來觀察「爭議兩造」、「仲裁人」及「仲裁制度」三個變項的交集點──仲裁判斷(arbitration awards)──對爭議兩造在重複競局(repeated game)中報價策略的影響,並試圖探究如何縮短個體理性與集體理性之間的落差,冀能透過制度設計來提供爭議各造誠實報價的誘因,並進一步促使仲裁人在從事判斷時能秉公處理,藉以回歸仲裁公平與專業的本質。
Ashenfelter, Orley, Currie, Janet, Farber, Henry S., and Matthew Spiegel. 1992. An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems. Econometrica 60(6):1407-1433.
Ashenfelter, Orley. 1987. Arbitrator Behavior. American Economic Review 77(2):342-346.
Ashenfelter, Orley, and David E.Bloom. 1984. Models of Arbitrator Behavior: Theory and Evidence. American Economic Review 74(1):111-124.
Ashenfelter, Orley, and George E. Johnson. 1969. Bargaining Theory, Trade Unions, and Industrial Strike Activity. American Economic Review 59:35-49.
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Berk, Jonathan B., Hughson, Eric, and Kirk Vandezande. 1996. The Price Is Right, But Are the Bids? An Investigation of Rational Decision Theory. American Economic Review 86(4):954-970.
Bloom, David E., and Christopher L. Cavanagh. 1987. Negotiator Behavior under Arbitraion. American Economic Review 77(2):353-358.
Bloom, David E., and Christopher L. Cavanagh. 1986. A Analysis of the Selection of Arbitrators. American Economic Review 76(3):408-422.
Bogdanor, Vernon. (Ed.). 1987. The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Institutions. London: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Bolton, Gary E., and Elena Katok. 1998. Reinterpreting Arbitration’s Nacotic Effect: An Experimental Study of Learning in Repeated Bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior 25:1-33.
Brams, Steven J. 1990. Negotiation Games: Applying Game Theory to Bargaining and Arbitration. New York: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall, Inc.
Brams, Steven J., and Alan D.Taylor. 1996. Fair Division: From Cake-Cutting to Dispute Resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brams, Steven J., Kilgour, D. Marc, and Samuel Merrill III. 1991. Arbitration Procedures. In Negotiation Analysis, ed. H. Peyton Young. Michigan: Michigan University Press.
Bruce, Christopher J., and Jo Carby-Hall. 1991. Rethinking Labour-Management Relations: the Case for Arbitration. New York: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall, Inc.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Newman, David, and Alvin Rabushka. 1985. Forecasting Political Events: The future of Hong Kong. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Campa, Jose Manuel, and P. H. Kevin Chang. 1996. Arbitrage-Based Tests of Target-Zone Credibility: Evidence from ERM Cross-Rate Options. American Economic Review 86(4):726-740.
Coase, Ronald H. 1988. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coleman, James S. 1990. The Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Dunlop, John T. 1984. Dispute Resolution: Negotiation and Consensus Building. New York: Auburn House.
Erev, Ido, and Alvin E. Roth. 1998. Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria. American Economic Review 88(4):849-881.
Farber, Henry S. 1980b. Does Final-Offer Arbitration Encourage Bargaining? Proceeding of the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 219-226.
Farber, Henry S., and Max H. Bazerman. 1986.The General Basis of Arbitrator Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Conventional and Final-Offer Arbitration. Econometrica 54(6): 1503-1528.
Farber, Henry S., and Max H. Bazerman. 1987. Why is there Disagreement in Bargaining? American Economic Review 77(2):347-352.
Farber, Henry S., and Max H. Bazerman. 1989. Divergent Expectations as a Cause of Disagreement in Bargaining: Evidence from a Comparison of Arbitration Schemes. Quartely Journal of Economics 104:99-120.
Feuille, Peter, Delaney, John Thomas, and Wallace Hendricks. 1985. The Impact of Interest Arbitration on Police Contracts. Industrial Relations 24(2):161-181.
Fizel, John. 1996. Bias in Salary Arbitration: The Case of Major League Baseball. Applied Economics 28(2):255-265.
Flanagan, Robert J. 1991. Socrates Confronts Final-Offer Selection. Industrial Relations 30(1):163-167.
Frederick, David M., Kaempfer, William H., Ross, Martin T., and Richard L. Wobbekind. 1998. Arbitration versus Negotiation: The Risk Aversion of Players. Applied Economics Letters 5(3):187-190.
Friedman, Clara H. 1995. Between Management and Labour: Oral Histories of Arbitration. New York: Twayne Publishers.
Gallagher, Daniel G., and M. D. Chaubey. 1982. Impasse Behavior and Tri-Offer Arbitration in Iowa. Industrial Relations 21(2): 129-148.
Gardner, Roy. 1995. Games for Business and Economics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Gibbons, Robert. 1988. Learning in Equilibrium Models of Arbitration. American Economic Review 78(5):896-912.
Goodin, Robert E. 1996. The Theory of Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hall, Lavinia.Ed. 1993. Negotiation: Strategies for Mutual Gain. California: Sage Publications.
Hebdon, Robert P., and Robert N. Stern. 1998. Tradeoffs among Expressions of Industrial Conflict: Public Sector Strike Bans and Grievance Arbitration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 51(2):204-221.
Hammond III, John S, Keeney, Ralph L., and Howard Raiffa. 1998. Smart Choices: a practical guide to making better decision. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Kanowitz, Leo. 1986. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Cases and Materials. Minnesota: West Publishing Co.
Kellor, Frances. 1972. American Arbitration: It’s History, Functions and Achievements. New York: Kennikat.
Kressel, Kenneth, Pruitt, Dean G., and Associations. 1989. Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Third-Party Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kichan, Thomas A., Mironi, Mordehai, Ehrenberg, Ronald G., Baderschneider, Jean, and Todd Jick. 1979. Dispute Resolution under Fact-finding and Arbitration: An Empirical Evaluation. New York: American Arbitration Association.
Kremenyuk, Victor A. Ed. International Negotiation: Analysis, Approach, Issues. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lester, Richard. 1984. Labor Arbitration in State and Local Government. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Long, Gary, and Peter Feuille. 1974. Final-Offer Arbitration: “Sudden Death”in Eugene. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 27(2):186-203.
McCall, Brian P. 1990. Interest Arbitration and the Incentive to Bargain. Journal of Conflict Resolution 34(1):151-167.
Morrow, James D. 1994. Game Theory for Political Scientist. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nicholson, Micheal. 1991. Negotiation, Agreement and Conflict Resolution: The Role of Rational Approaches and their Criticism. In New Directions in Conflict Theory: Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation, ed. Raimo Vayrynen. London: Sage.
Olson, Carig A. 1980. The Impact of Arbitration on the Wages of Firefighters. Industrial Relations 19(3):325-337.
Olson, Carig A., and Barbara L. Rau. 1997. Learning from Interest Arbitraion: the Next Round. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 50(2):237-215.
Olson, Carig A., Dell’omo, Gregory G., and Paul Jarley. 1992. A Comparison of Interest Arbitrator Decision-Making in Experimental and Field Setting. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45(4):711-723.
Olson, Mancur Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ordeshook, Peter C. 1986. Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Osborne Martin J., and Ariel Rubinstein. 1998. Games with procedurally Rational Players. American Economic Review 88(4):835-847.
Ostrom, Vincent., Feeny, David., and Hartmut Picht 1988. Rethinking Institutional Analysis and Development: Issues, Alternatives, and Choices. San Francisco: International Center for Economics Growth.
Powell, W. W., and P. J. DiMaggio. (Ed.). 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Raiffa, Howard. 1996. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge: Havard University Press.
Raiffa, Howard. 1995. Analytical Barriers. In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, ed. Kenneth J. Arrow et al. California: The Stanford Center on Conflict & Negotiation.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: The Balknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Schellenberg, James A. 1996. Conflict Resolution: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: State University of New York Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1976(1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Simpson, Patricia A., and Joseph J Martocchio. 1997. The Influence of Work History Factors on Arbitraion Outcomes. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 50(2):252-267.
Speight, Alan E. H., and Dennis A. Thomas. 1997a. Conventional Arbitration in the Professional Footballer’s Labour Market: an Assessment of the FLAC Experience. Industrial Relations Journal 28(3):221-235.
Speight, Alan E. H., and Dennis A. Thomas. 1997b. Football League Transfers: A Comparison of Negotiated Fees with Arbitration Settlements. Applied Economics Letters 4:41-44.
Stone, I. F. 1988. The Trial of Socrates. Boston: Brown & Co.
Thornton, Robert J., and Perry A. Zirkel. 1990. The Consistency and Predictability of Grievance Arbitration Awards. Industrial and Labor Relation Review 43(2):294-307.
Vickerey, William. 1960. Utility, Strategy, and Social Decision Rules. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 74(4):507-511.
Weimer, David L. 1995. Institutional Design. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Zigarelli, Michael A. 1996. Dispute Resolution Mechanisms and Teacher Bargaining Outcomes. Journal of Labor Research 17(1):135-148.
毛慶生等合著
民88年 《經濟學》,二版,台北:華泰文化事業公司。
王躍生
民86年 《新制度主義》,台北:揚智文化。
吳秀光
民86年b 〈理性抉擇途徑與兩岸關係研究〉,中國大陸研究,第38卷,第3期,頁58-65。
吳秀光
民87年 《政府談判之博奕理論分析》,台北:時英出版社。
沈清松
民79年 《人我交融:自我成熟與人際關係》,台北:時英出版社。
林添貴譯;Alfred D. Wilhelm, Jr.著
民84年 《談判桌上的中國人》,台北:新新聞文化事業股份有限公司。
胡國才譯;Henry A. Kissinger著
民71年 《核子武器與外交政策》,台北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。
徐仁輝
民88年 《當代預算改革的制度性研究》,台北:智勝文化。
陳坤銘、李華夏譯;Coase, Ronald. H. 著
民84年 《廠商、市場與法律》,台北:遠流出版公司。
陳煥文
民88年 《仲裁法逐條釋義》,台北:自刊。
陳煥文
民83年 《國際仲裁法專論》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
陳順發譯;Avinash K. Dixit and Barry J. Nalebuff著
民85年 《大謀略:遊戲理論的全方位運用》,台北:牛頓出版股份有限公司。
陳欽春
民87年 國土規劃期未報告,台北:國立台北大學。
黃宏義譯;Roger Fisher and William Ury著
民75年 《哈佛談判術》,台北:長河出版社。
詹中原
民86年 《危機管理上課講義》。
孫本初譯;Brody, Richard A., and Adand C. N. Brownstein著
民72年 《實驗方法與模擬》,台北:幼獅文化事業公司。
新新聞編輯小組譯;Nancy B. Tucker著
民84年 《不確定的友情:台灣、香港與美國,1945至1992》,台北:新新聞文化事業股份有限公司。
楊崇森等合著
民88年 《仲裁法新論》,台北:中華民國仲裁協會。
賓靜蓀譯;Max H. Bazerman and Margart A. Neale著
民82年 《樂在談判》(Negotiation Rationally, 1992),台北:天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
謝復生
民79年 《民意、制衡與效率──論民主的價值》,台北:敦煌書局。
謝瑤玲譯;Herb Cohen著
民80年 《談判的技巧》,台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
劉瑞華譯;North, Douglass C. 著
民83年 《制度、制度變遷與經濟成就》,台北:時報文化。
鄧方譯;Kreps, D. M. 著
民85年 《賽局理論與經濟模型》,台北:五南圖書出版公司。
鄧東濱等編著
民80年 《個體經濟學理論》,台北:三民書局。
董安琪譯;Olson, Mancur著
民78年 《集體行動的邏輯》,台北:遠流出版公司。
薛密譯;Simon Singh著
民87年 《費瑪的最後定理》,台北:臺灣商務。
蕭全政
民86年 〈組織與制度的政治經濟分析〉,《暨大學報》,第一卷,第一期,頁1-16。
藍瀛芳
民87年 〈從德國新仲裁法看我國新仲裁法〉,《商務仲裁》,第51期,頁1-23。
|
Page generated in 0.0495 seconds