Spelling suggestions: "subject:"double lattice method""
1 |
The Effect of Wing Damage on Aeroelastic BehaviorConyers, Howard J. January 2009 (has links)
<p>Theoretical and experimental studies are conducted in the field of aeroelasticity. Specifically, two rectangular and one cropped delta wings with a hole are analyzed in this dissertation for their aeroelastic behavior.</p><p>The plate-like wings are modeled using the finite element method for the structural theory. Each wing is assumed to behave as a linearly elastic and isotropic, thin plate. These assumptions are those of small-deflection theory of bending which states that the plane sections initially normal to the midsurface remain plane and normal to that surface after bending. The wings are modeled in low speed flows according to potential flow theory. The potential flow is governed by the aerodynamic potential equation, a linear partial differential equation. The aerodynamic potential equation is solved using a distribution of doublets that relates pressure to downwash in the doublet lattice method. A hole in a wing-like structure is independently investigated theoretically and experimentally for its structural and aerodynamic behavior.</p><p>The aeroelastic model couples the structural and aerodynamic models using Lagrange's equations. The flutter boundary is predicted using the V-g method. Linear theoretical models are capable of predicting the critical flutter velocity and frequency as verified by wind tunnel tests. Along with flutter prediction, a brief survey on gust response and the addition of stores(missile or fuel tanks) are examined.</p> / Dissertation
|
2 |
Advanced linear methods for T-tail aeroelasticity / Louwrens Hermias van ZylVan Zyl, Louwrens Hermias January 2011 (has links)
Flutter is one of the primary aeroelastic phenomena that must be considered in aircraft design.
Flutter is a self-sustaining structural vibration in which energy is extracted from the air flow and
transferred to the structure. The amplitude of the vibration grows exponentially until structural
failure occurs. Flutter stability requirements often influence the design of an aircraft, making
accurate flutter prediction capabilities an essential part of the design process. Advances in
computational fluid dynamics and computational power make it possible to solve the fluid flow and
structural dynamics simultaneously, providing highly accurate solutions especially in the transonic
flow regime. This procedure is, however, too time-consuming to be used in the design optimisation
process. As a result panel codes, e.g., the doublet lattice method, and modal-based structural
analysis methods are still being used extensively and continually improved.
One application that is lagging in terms of accuracy and simplicity (from the user’s perspective)
is the flutter analysis of T-tails. The flutter analysis of a T-tail usually involves the calculation of
additional aerodynamic loads, apart from the loads calculated by the standard unsteady
aerodynamic codes for conventional empennages. The popular implementations of the doublet
lattice method do not calculate loads due to the in-plane motion (i.e., lateral or longitudinal motion)
of the horizontal stabiliser or the in-plane loads on the stabiliser. In addition, these loads are
dependent on the steady-state load distribution on the stabiliser, which is ignored in the doublet
lattice method.
The objective of the study was to extend the doublet lattice method to calculate the additional
aerodynamic loads that are crucial for T-tail flutter analysis along with the customary unsteady air
loads for conventional configurations. This was achieved by employing the Kutta-Joukowski
theorem in the calculation of unsteady air loads on lifting surface panels. Calculating the additional
unsteady air loads for T-tails within the doublet lattice method significantly reduces the human
effort required for T-tail flutter analysis as well as the opportunities for introducing errors into the
analysis.
During the course of the study it became apparent that it was necessary to consider the quadratic
mode shape components in addition to the linear mode shape components. Otherwise the unsteady
loads due to the rotation (“tilting”) of the steady-state load on the stabiliser, one of the additional
aerodynamic loads that are crucial for T-tail flutter analysis, would give rise to spurious generalised
forces. In order to reduce the additional burden of determining the quadratic mode shape components, methods for calculating quadratic mode shape components using linear finite element
analysis or estimating them from the linear mode shape components were developed.
Wind tunnel tests were performed to validate the proposed computational method. A T-tail
flutter model which incorporated a mechanism for changing the incidence angle of the horizontal
stabiliser, and consequently the steady-state load distribution on the horizontal stabiliser, was used.
The flutter speed of this model as a function of the horizontal stabiliser incidence was determined
experimentally and compared to predictions. Satisfactory correlation was found between predicted
and experimentally determined flutter speeds. / Thesis (M.Ing. (Chemical Engineering))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012
|
3 |
Advanced linear methods for T-tail aeroelasticity / Louwrens Hermias van ZylVan Zyl, Louwrens Hermias January 2011 (has links)
Flutter is one of the primary aeroelastic phenomena that must be considered in aircraft design.
Flutter is a self-sustaining structural vibration in which energy is extracted from the air flow and
transferred to the structure. The amplitude of the vibration grows exponentially until structural
failure occurs. Flutter stability requirements often influence the design of an aircraft, making
accurate flutter prediction capabilities an essential part of the design process. Advances in
computational fluid dynamics and computational power make it possible to solve the fluid flow and
structural dynamics simultaneously, providing highly accurate solutions especially in the transonic
flow regime. This procedure is, however, too time-consuming to be used in the design optimisation
process. As a result panel codes, e.g., the doublet lattice method, and modal-based structural
analysis methods are still being used extensively and continually improved.
One application that is lagging in terms of accuracy and simplicity (from the user’s perspective)
is the flutter analysis of T-tails. The flutter analysis of a T-tail usually involves the calculation of
additional aerodynamic loads, apart from the loads calculated by the standard unsteady
aerodynamic codes for conventional empennages. The popular implementations of the doublet
lattice method do not calculate loads due to the in-plane motion (i.e., lateral or longitudinal motion)
of the horizontal stabiliser or the in-plane loads on the stabiliser. In addition, these loads are
dependent on the steady-state load distribution on the stabiliser, which is ignored in the doublet
lattice method.
The objective of the study was to extend the doublet lattice method to calculate the additional
aerodynamic loads that are crucial for T-tail flutter analysis along with the customary unsteady air
loads for conventional configurations. This was achieved by employing the Kutta-Joukowski
theorem in the calculation of unsteady air loads on lifting surface panels. Calculating the additional
unsteady air loads for T-tails within the doublet lattice method significantly reduces the human
effort required for T-tail flutter analysis as well as the opportunities for introducing errors into the
analysis.
During the course of the study it became apparent that it was necessary to consider the quadratic
mode shape components in addition to the linear mode shape components. Otherwise the unsteady
loads due to the rotation (“tilting”) of the steady-state load on the stabiliser, one of the additional
aerodynamic loads that are crucial for T-tail flutter analysis, would give rise to spurious generalised
forces. In order to reduce the additional burden of determining the quadratic mode shape components, methods for calculating quadratic mode shape components using linear finite element
analysis or estimating them from the linear mode shape components were developed.
Wind tunnel tests were performed to validate the proposed computational method. A T-tail
flutter model which incorporated a mechanism for changing the incidence angle of the horizontal
stabiliser, and consequently the steady-state load distribution on the horizontal stabiliser, was used.
The flutter speed of this model as a function of the horizontal stabiliser incidence was determined
experimentally and compared to predictions. Satisfactory correlation was found between predicted
and experimentally determined flutter speeds. / Thesis (M.Ing. (Chemical Engineering))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012
|
4 |
Transonic Flutter for aGeneric Fighter Configuration / Transoniskt fladder för en generiskflygplanskonfigurationBååthe, Axel January 2018 (has links)
A hazardous and not fully understood aeroelastic phenomenon is the transonic dip,the decrease in flutter dynamic pressure that occurs for most aircraft configurationsin transonic flows. The difficulty of predicting this phenomenon forces aircraft manufacturersto run long and costly flight test campaigns to demonstrate flutter-free behaviourof their aircraft at transonic Mach numbers.In this project, subsonic and transonic flutter calculations for the KTH-NASA genericfighter research model have been performed and compared to existing experimentalflutter data from wind tunnel tests performed at NASA Langley in 2016. For the fluttercalculations, industry-standard linear panel methods have been used together with afinite element model from NASTRAN.Further, an alternative approach for more accurate transonic flutter predictions usingthe full-potential solver Phi has been investigated. To predict flutter using this newmethodology a simplified structural model has been used together with aerodynamicmeshes of the main wing. The purpose of the approach was to see if it was possibleto find a method that was more accurate than panel methods in the transonic regimewhilst still being suitable for use during iterative design processes.The results of this project demonstrated that industry-standard linear panel methodssignificantly over-predict the flutter boundary in the transonic regime. It was alsoseen that the flutter predictions using Phi showed potential, being close to the linearresults for the same configuration as tested in Phi. For improved transonic accuracy inPhi, an improved transonic flow finite element formulation could possibly help .Another challenge with Phi is the requirement of an explicit wake from all liftingsurfaces in the aerodynamic mesh. Therefore, a method for meshing external storeswith blunt trailing edges needs to be developed. One concept suggested in this projectis to model external stores in "2.5D", representing external stores using airfoils withsharp trailing edges. / Ett farligt och inte helt utrett aeroelastiskt fenomen är den transoniska dippen, minskningeni dynamiska trycket vid fladder som inträffar för de flesta flygplan i transoniskaflöden. Svårigheten i att prediktera detta fenomen tvingar flygplanstillverkare attbedriva tidskrävande och kostsam flygprovsverksamhet för att demonstrera att derasflygplan ej uppvisar fladderbeteende i transonik inom det tilltänkta användningsområdet.I detta projekt har fladderberäkningar genomförts i både underljud och transonikför en generisk stridsflygplansmodell i skala 1:4 ämnad för forskning, byggd som ettsamarbete mellan KTH och NASA. Beräkningarna har också jämförts med fladderresultatfrån vindtunnelprov genomförda vid NASA Langley under sommaren 2016. Förfladderberäkningarna har industri-standarden linjära panelmetoder används tillsammansmed en befintlig finit element modell för användning i NASTRAN.Vidare har ett alternativt tillvägagångssätt för att förbättra precisionen i transoniskafladderresultat genom att använda potentiallösaren Phi undersökts. En förenkladstrukturmodell har använts tillsammans med aerodynamiska nät av huvudvingen föratt prediktera fladder. Syftet med denna metodik var att undersöka om det var möjligtatt hitta en metod som i transoniska flöden var mer exakt än panelmetoder men somfortfarande kunde användas i iterativa design processer.Resultaten från detta projekt visade att linjära panelmetoder, som de som används iindustrin, är signifikant icke-konservativa gällande fladdergränsen i transonik. Resultatenfrån Phi visade potential genom att vara nära de linjära resultaten som räknadesfram med hjälp av panelmetoder för samma konfiguration som i Phi. För ökad transonisknoggrannhet i Phi kan möjligen en förbättrad transonisk element-formuleringhjälpa.En annan utmaning med Phi är kravet på en explicit vak från alla bärande ytor idet aerodynamiska nätet. Därför behöver det utvecklas en metodik för nätgenereringav yttre laster med trubbiga bakkanter. Ett koncept som föreslås i denna rapport är attmodellera yttre laster i "2.5D", där alla yttre laster beskrivs genom att använda vingprofilermed skarpa bakkanter.
|
Page generated in 0.119 seconds