Spelling suggestions: "subject:"drug embedment anchor"" "subject:"drug embedment anchored""
1 |
Analytical and Experimental Studies of Drag Embedment Anchors and Suction CaissonsBeemer, Ryan 2011 May 1900 (has links)
The need for experimental and analytical modeling in the field of deep water offshore
anchoring technologies is high. Suction caisson and drag embedment anchors (DEA) are
common anchors used for mooring structures in deep water. The installation process of
drag embedment anchors has been highly empirical, employing a trial and error
methodology. In the past decade analytical methods have been derived for modeling
DEA installation trajectories. However, obtaining calibration data for these models has
not been economical. The development of a small scale experimental apparatus, known
as the Laponite Tank, was developed for this thesis. The Laponite Tank provides a quick
and economical means of measuring DEA trajectories, visually. The experimental data
can then be used for calibrating models. The installation process of suctions caissons
has benefited from from a more rational approach. Nevertheless, these methods require
refinement and removal methodology requires development. In this thesis, an algorithm
for modeling suction caisson installation in clay has been presented. An analytical
method and modeling algorithm for removal processes of suction caissons in clay was
also developed. The installation and removal models were calibrated to field data. These
analytical and experimental studies can provide a better understanding of installation of
drag embedment anchors and the installation and removal of suction caissons.
|
2 |
Experimental Modeling and Laboratory Measurements of Drag Embedment Anchors Subjected to In-Plane and Out-Of-Plane LoadingDrake, Aaron C. 2011 August 1900 (has links)
Extreme hurricane events of the past decade are responsible for several drag embedment anchor (DEA) mooring failures of mobile offshore drilling platforms stationed within the Gulf of Mexico. A proposed failure mechanism is caused by out-of-plane loading. The current status of DEA holding capacity is based on empirical design charts and does not include the effects of out-of-plane loading. Experimental modeling using a 1:10 scale generic DEA was performed at the Haynes Coastal Engineering Laboratory at Texas A & M University to examine the effects of out-of-plane load conditions. Instrumentation and specialized devices were constructed to measure the anchor's trajectory through a representative sample of Gulf of Mexico clay with average un-drained shear strength of 0.764 kPa (16 psf). The sediment basin allowed for drag distances of 4.87 m (16 ft) and an embedment depth of 1.37 m (4.5 ft).
The measurements included pitch and roll of the anchor and line tension measured at the shank pad-eye. The variables modeled were fluke angle settings of 22°, 36° and 50°. The initial towline angle was varied from a minimum of 5° to upwards of 20°. Surface out-of-plane angles of 45° and 90° and embedment loading of 15°, 30° and 45° were examined. Curves of the ultimate holding capacity with respect to the out-of-plane towline angle and ultimate embedment depth were developed as functions of out-of-plane loading angles. Analysis of the rate effect indicates that a 46 percent increase in towing velocity causes an average 3 percent increase of holding capacity. The 50° fluke angle embeds an average of 0.7 fluke lengths deeper and has a holding capacity of 0.73 units greater than the 36° setting. The surface out-of-plane tests have a 5.1 percent reduction in holding capacity as the out-of-plane load angle increases from 45° to 90°. For all one fluke length initial towing distance tests, the ultimate holding capacity increases and the ultimate embedment depth decreases as the out-of-plane towing angle increases from 15° to 45°. The three fluke length initial towing distance tests indicate a contrasting trend, in that as the out-of-plane tow angle increases, both the ultimate holding capacity and ultimate embedment depth decrease.
|
3 |
Experimental testing of pure translation and rotation loading of drag anchorsGanjoo, Karan 21 December 2010 (has links)
Mobile offshore drilling units are being used in the Gulf of Mexico to produce oil and gas. Anchoring systems such as drag embedment anchors and vertically loaded anchors are used to keep these units in place. Past mooring system failures due to hurricanes in 2004 and 2005 initiated a need to better understand the performance of these anchors to in-plane and out-of-plane loading conditions. In-plane and out-of-plane loading cause the anchor to translate or rotate in the directions of its six degrees of freedom. Behavior and holding capacity of the anchors when loaded in each of is six degrees of freedom are important in understanding and predicting their behavior.
An experimental program was devised to investigate the behavior of anchors in pure translation and rotation loading. The scaled-model anchors were embedded at a measured depth in a soil bed of clay with an undrained shear strength between 10 and 20 psf and then loaded to failure. A rotation testing frame was designed to impose rotational loading in the yaw, roll and pitch directions.
Test results from the experimental program are consistent and repeatable. The bearing factors for pure bearing fell well within the range of existing experimental and analytical studies on simple plates. Bearing factors for in-plane and out-of-plane shear and for all rotations are higher than those for simple plates due to presence of the shank. When the resistance is normalized by area of the fluke, the wider model provide greater normalized resistance to yawing, similar normalized resistance to pitching and rolling and less normalized resistance to bearing and shearing.
It was concluded that the holding capacity of an anchor in its six degrees of freedom depends largely on its geometry, including the fluke and the shank. / text
|
Page generated in 0.0628 seconds