Master-Arbeit Univ. St. Gallen, 2006.

Thesis--University of Florida. / Description based on print version record. Typescript. Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 160-170).

Zugl.: Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2002.

Zugl.: Mannheim, Univ., Diss., 2005 u.d.T.: Strategieorientierte HR Due Diligence - Reduzierung von Informationssymmetrien bei Unternehmensakquisitionen

No description available.

A novel gel-filled electrochemical hydrogen probe was developed and used to measure hydrogen concentrations in carbon-manganese steels. The results were compared with those from an electrochemical permeation technique and a volumetric method. The probe was used to determine the distribution of hydrogen in 5mm steel plates cathodically charged on one side to represent the wall of a pipe or pressure vessel used in hydrogen service. The concentration measurements obtained by the three techniques were in good agreement with each other and with those predicted from diffusion equations and this permitted the precise boundary conditions on the charged metal surface to be determined. Surface reaction kinetics were investigated to model the hydrogen distribution and these were solved using solutions to Fick's diffusion equations. After long charging times the hydrogen concentration on the efflux surface of the plate approached that on the influx side, indicating that an almost uniform hydrogen distribution had been established. Rather than rapid loss of hydrogen from the free surface, as had been assumed previously, it was clear that there was a large resistance to hydrogen transport across the metal/air interface. Microstructural damage was examined both optically and using the scanning electron microscope. Separate investigations were carried out to help understand the effect that reversible and irreversible trapping had on the diffusion of hydrogen through the steel.

In the last 100 years, vast technological and communicational changes have occurred in all modes of transportation, with momentous changes to the carriage of cargo by sea. In response, the shipping industry has attempted to codify, at the international level, regulations and standards with the aim of providing a safe environment at sea. In turn, the shipping industry’s regulations impact upon the way sea carriage is performed. The obligation of seaworthiness is no exception. The requisite standard of seaworthiness is also, to a limited extent, governed by the shipping indsutry’s regulations. It is notable that the shipping industry’s regulations cannot keep pace with technological developments and they therefore lag behind the latest inventions. This creates an imbalance in the risk borne between the parties to the contract of carriage. Accordingly, the current law on seaworthiness requires modification in order to keep up with the technological evolution in the shipping industry. For such reasons, the Rotterdam Rules and its provisions on seaworthiness, were agreed. This thesis focuses on the scope of the provisions that relate to the obligation of seaworthiness in the Rotterdam Rules as compared to the parallel obligation in the existing regime under the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules. In order to ascertain whether the new convention provides a sound system to govern the law relating to seaworthiness, it is necessary to deal with the carrier’s obligation of seaworthiness under the Rotterdam Rules as compared to the widely used regime of the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules. However, the Rotterdam Rules introduce additional changes to the regime governing the carriage of goods; for example, multimodal transport. These changes are also considered in this study. This thesis discusses the impact of multimodal carriage on the obligation and liability of seaworthiness. It proposes that a multimodality approach should not be used with particular types of sea carriage; for example, container carriage. Throughout the thesis, proposals for both regimes concerning changes to areas where the risk between the contracting parties is imbalanced are provided. This inevitably involves a detailed study on the provisions relating to the obligation of exercising due diligence (and related potential liabilities in case of breach) under the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules and the Rotterdam Rules.

The capitalization effect of property tax differentials for the four market quarters in 1976 was studied in the Logan, Utah market area. A secondary aspect of the study was to assess the variations in the assessed to market value ratio. 107 observed sales were used for the data set. Age of structure, square feet in structure, quality of neighborhood, and property tax were noted for each property sold. From the regression analysis it was found that there was a significant capitalization of the tax differentials. The results indicate that a one-percent change in the property tax will result in a 0.4 percent change in property value. Also observed was the assessed to market value ratio. Results indicate that the actual ratio is about 12.5 percent not 20 percent, as is required by state law. The range in the ratio was from about 4 precent to 20 percent.

No description available.

Human Rights Due Diligence is a key topic in the debates among human rights advocates and the business world. Its understanding varies from a standard ofexpected care to a process to manage business risks. As introduced in the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, it is a process through which business enterprises should identify, assess and properly address human rights risks. Today, the concept is used or tends to be incorporated in avariety of legal instruments, from international soft-law to regional and national regulations. However, the understanding of what is the objective of human rights due diligence, its content, and the required standard still vary. Relying on the international soft-law instruments and the developments in national law, this study analyzes the foundation and narrative of human rights due diligence, content, common elements, and scope of obligation in a way to identify similarities and/or differences in the concept within different jurisdictions.