• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

The effect of framework flexibility on diffusion of small molecules in the metal-organic framework IRMOF-1

Ford, Denise C., Dubbeldam, David, Snurr, Randall Q. 04 December 2015 (has links) (PDF)
Many efforts have been made to model adsorption and diffusion processes in metalorganic frameworks (MOFs) in the past several years. In most of these studies, the framework has been kept rigid. In this study, we examine the effect of using a flexible framework model on the self-diffusion coefficients and activation energies calculated for several short n-alkanes and benzene in IRMOF-1 from molecular dynamics simulations. We find only minor differences between flexible and rigid framework results. The selfdiffusion coefficients calculated in the flexible framework are 20-50% larger than the ones calculated in the rigid framework, and the activation energies differ by only 10-20%.
2

The effect of framework flexibility on diffusion of small molecules in the metal-organic framework IRMOF-1

Ford, Denise C., Dubbeldam, David, Snurr, Randall Q. January 2009 (has links)
Many efforts have been made to model adsorption and diffusion processes in metalorganic frameworks (MOFs) in the past several years. In most of these studies, the framework has been kept rigid. In this study, we examine the effect of using a flexible framework model on the self-diffusion coefficients and activation energies calculated for several short n-alkanes and benzene in IRMOF-1 from molecular dynamics simulations. We find only minor differences between flexible and rigid framework results. The selfdiffusion coefficients calculated in the flexible framework are 20-50% larger than the ones calculated in the rigid framework, and the activation energies differ by only 10-20%.

Page generated in 0.0485 seconds