acase@tulane.edu

Background An ongoing public policy concern in the United States is disparities in health care for racial/ethnic minority populations. The National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR) addresses these disparities for chronic diseases such as diabetes that impose economic and health burdens on society that need to be partly managed by health care policies. One understudied aspect of diabetes care is racial/ethnic disparities in the pharmacological management of the disease. Objective The objective of this study was to determine whether racial/ethnic disparities exist in the pharmacological treatment of diabetes, and if so, how do individual characteristics such as socioeconomic status (SES) influence the differences. Methods This study used national survey data collected through the 2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes treatment were examined using a methodology based on the Institute of Medicine (IOM) definition of disparity that adjusts for health status factors while allowing SES factors to mediate differences. The effects of independent variables on receipt of antidiabetic medication prescriptions among individuals who self-reported a diagnosis of diabetes were examined. Regression analyses were performed on unadjusted data and on data transformed by a rank-and-replace method to approximate the IOM definition. Results Among 1,844 survey respondents with self-reported diabetes, significant differences were found for race/ethnicity, education, health insurance, and the co-morbidities of heart disease and eye problems/retinopathy. Race/ethnicity was a significant predictor of the receipt of antidiabetic prescriptions, with Hispanics being more than 2 times as likely as non-Hispanic whites to have received a prescription. This difference was magnified in the IOM model that controlled for health status. In the IOM model, no significant differences were observed between non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks or other minorities. Having health insurance, higher education, or eye problems/retinopathy were also significant predictors of receiving antidiabetic prescriptions. Conclusion Using a methodology that adjusts for factors related to health status while allowing factors related to SES to mediate racial/ethnic differences, disparities were observed between non-Hispanic whites and minorities, particularly Hispanics, in the likelihood of receiving a prescription for antidiabetic medication. The agreement of these results with the few studies on the pharmacological management of diabetes is mixed, and suggests the need for additional studies. Application of a rigorous definition of racial/ethnic disparities and the implementation of methodologies that adjust for health status while allowing mediation by SES factors are needed to address important gaps in the treatment of diabetes. / acase@tulane.edu

acase@tulane.edu

This study investigated the impact of the Malcolm Baldrige Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence (HCPE) on effectiveness in health care organizational performance. The quality of health care has tremendous social and economic consequences for the United States (U.S.), including lost wages, reduced productivity, higher legal expenses, and lower confidence in the health care system. Increasing health care productivity, efficiency, effectiveness, and quality offers critical means to reducing cost and improving U.S. economic performance, which is an objective of the Affordable Care Act enacted by Congress in 2010. This study compared Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award recipients to competitors in their geographic markets using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) performance measures to determine if there was a relationship between the use of the HCPE as a business model and the performance of health care organizations. This study included an analysis comparing 34 hospitals using the HCPE as an organizational business model to 153 hospitals in their geographic markets not using the HCPE. There were 42 CMS measures classified into 2 major categories focused on (1) patient experience measures and (2) clinical processes and outcome measures. The results showed that the study-identified hospitals that used the HCPE had values representing higher performance on all 10 patient experience measures than the non-HCPE hospitals, and that 9 of the 10 measures were statistically significant. Although the group mean differences were not statistically significant, the study results showed that HCPE hospitals had performance outcomes with mean values representing higher performance than the non-HCPE hospitals in 38 of the 42 (90%) of the study measures. These results should provide leadership with confidence that the HCPE serve as a valid model to align organizational design, strategy, systems, and human capital to create long-term effectiveness in an institutionalized high performance culture. / acase@tulane.edu

In Mississippi, approximately 4,700 deaths are caused by smoking and approximately 3,500 young Mississippians begin smoking each year. Nearly 9 out of 10 smokers start smoking by age 18, and 99% start by age 26. Because of the early age of initiation, policy changes and other initiatives that affect smoking rates among youth are of particular interest, including tax increases. In 2009, Mississippi increased its state excise tax on tobacco from $.18 to $.68 per pack which was in addition to the federal tax increase to $1.0066 (an increase of $.6166 from the previous amount of $.39). This study examined the effect of Mississippi's tobacco tax increase on youth smoking initiation and tobacco consumption behavior using difference-in-difference analysis. Using the SmartTrackTM School Survey this study analyzed changes in youth who reported ever smoking and their recent consumption from the three years prior to the tax increase to the three years following it using data from the Louisiana Caring Communities Youth Survey as the control group since Louisiana did not experienced a state-level cigarette tax increase during this period. The analysis showed mixed results for a statistically significant difference in smoking initiation (ever smoked cigarettes) rates, and moderately supported the hypothesis of past 30 day youth smoking rates being reduced by the tax increase on cigarettes in Mississippi. While youth smoking rates declined significantly during the study period, the difference-in-difference analysis of youth who reported ever smoking showed only a small but statistically significant effect across all grades, but had a notable impact on 6th graders. The analysis of past 30 day use showed no short term effect on Mississippi youth in the year after the 2009 tax increase, but difference-in-difference comparisons showed a moderate and statistically significant impact on those rates the longer term. The results of this study will be of interest to scholars, policymakers, and tobacco control advocates as they make decisions about whether to increase state level taxes on cigarettes to prevent smoking initiation and curb youth tobacco use. / acase@tulane.edu

acase@tulane.edu

acase@tulane.edu

acase@tulane.edu

acase@tulane.edu

Background During the 1990s, Tanzania, like many other developing countries, adopted health sector reforms. The most common policy change under health sector reforms has been decentralisation, which involves the transfer of power and authority from the central levels to the local governments. However, while decentralisation of health care planning and priority-setting in Tanzania gained currency in the last decade, its performance has, so far, been less than satisfactory. In a five-year EU-supported project, which started in 2006, ways of strengthening fairness and accountability in priority-setting in district health management were studied through action research. As part of this overall project, this doctoral thesis aims to analyse the existing health care organisation and management systems, and explore the potential and challenges of implementing Accountability for Reasonableness approach to priority setting in Tanzania. Methods A qualitative case study in Mbarali district formed the basis of exploring the socio-political and institutional contexts within which health care decision-making takes place. The thesis also explores how the Accountability for Reasonableness intervention was shaped, enabled and constrained by the interaction between the contexts and mechanisms. Key informant interviews were conducted with the Council Health Management Team, local government officials, and other stakeholders, using a semi-structured interview guide. Relevant documents were also gathered and group priority-setting processes in the district were observed. Main findings The study revealed that, despite the obvious national rhetoric on decentralisation, actual practice in the district involved little community participation. The findings showed that decentralisation, in whatever form, does not automatically provide space for community engagement. The assumption that devolution to local government promotes transparency, accountability and community participation, is far from reality. In addition, the thesis found that while the Accountability for Reasonableness approach to priority setting was perceived to be helpful in strengthening transparency, accountability, stakeholder engagement and fairness, integrating the innovation into the current district health system was challenging.   Conclusion This thesis underscores the idea that greater involvement and accountability among local actors may increase the legitimacy and fairness of priority-setting decisions. A broader and more detailed analysis of health system elements, and socio-cultural context, can lead to better prediction of the effects of the innovation, pinpoint stakeholders’ concerns, and thereby illuminate areas requiring special attention in fostering sustainability. Additionally, the thesis stresses the need to recognise and deal with power asymmetries among various actors in priority-setting contexts.