Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Auburn University, 2006. / Abstract. Vita. Includes bibliographic references (p.89-95).

M.Tech. / Purpose: Lateral epicondylitis has been identified as one of the most common conditions affecting the upper limb. The exact pathophysiology of this condition is still under investigation; however it is believed to be an overuse injury which affects the common extensor tendon at the tenoperiosteal and/or the musculotendonous junctions. Despite the frequent occurrence of lateral epicondylitis and its considerable symptoms there is little scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of any treatment methods. As yet one treatment method has not been proved more effective than the other. The purpose of this comparative study was to determine whether manipulation combined with dry needling of the common extensor tendon and extensor muscle belly of the forearm, was more effective than cross friction of the common extensor tendon combined with manipulation with regards to a decrease in pain and an increase in pressure pain threshold. Method: This study consisted of 32 participants between the ages of 18 – 40. Possible participants were examined and accepted according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once accepted the participants were assigned into two groups each consisting of equal amounts of males and females. The first group received manipulation of their elbow combined with dry needling of their common extensor tendon and extensor muscle belly of their forearm. The second group also received manipulation of their elbow but this was combined with cross friction of their common extensor tendon. Procedure: Each participant received six treatment sessions and one follow up session. Objective data and subjective data was taken at the beginning of the first, fourth and seventh session. Objective data consisted of algometer readings that were taken on the common extensor tendon, the lateral epicondyle of the humerus and the extensor muscle belly. The subjective data collected was in the form of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The manipulation of the elbow was then administered based on the restrictions identified during motion palpation. This was followed by either dry needling of the common extensor tendon and the extensor muscle belly of the forearm or cross v friction of the common extensor tendon. The information collected was analysed by means of Friedman and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests.Results: Statistically significant improvements in all measurements were noted over the course of the treatments for all participants in both groups. However there was no statistically significant difference between the improvements of the dry needling group compared to that of the cross friction group. Conclusion: The results illustrate the effectiveness of the individual treatments over the treatment period. However it is still inconclusive whether one treatment method is more effective than the other. As this study was directed to a small group of participants, accurate conclusions could not be formulated to prove the effectiveness of one treatment method over that of another. Due to the insignificant findings obtained in this study, further studies need to be performed to determine which method of treatment is most effective when treating lateral epicondylitis.

No description available.

A recently discovered distal humerus shows that very large bodied amphicyonids existed in Pakistan in the Early Miocene. Movements on their elbow joint are interpreted to be very similar to those of modern bears. They had powerful front limbs, which were probably used to grasp the prey. Taxonomic affinities of the specimen are also discussed.

No description available.

This paper describes a three part analysis to characterize the interaction between the female upper extremity and a helicopter cockpit side airbag system and to develop dynamic hyperextension injury criteria for the female elbow joint. Part I involved a series of 10 experiments with an original Army Black Hawk helicopter side airbag. A 5th percentile female Hybrid III instrumented upper extremity was used to demonstrate side airbag upper extremity loading. Two out of the 10 tests resulted in high elbow bending moments of 128 Nm and 144 Nm. Part II included dynamic hyperextension tests on 24 female cadaver elbow joints. The energy source was a drop tower utilizing a three-point bending configuration to apply elbow bending moments matching the previously conducted side airbag tests. Post-test necropsy showed that 16 of the 24 elbow joint tests resulted in injuries. Injury severity ranged from minor cartilage damage to more severe joint dislocations and transverse fractures of the distal humerus. Peak elbow bending moments ranged from 42.4 Nm to 146.3 Nm. Peak bending moment proved to be a significant indicator of any elbow injury (p=0.02) as well as elbow joint dislocation (p=0.01). Logistic regression analyses were used to develop single and multivariate injury risk functions. Using peak moment data for the entire test population, a 50% risk of obtaining any elbow injury was found at 56 Nm while a 50% risk of sustaining an elbow joint dislocation was found at 93 Nm for the female population. These results indicate that the peak elbow bending moments achieved in Part I are associated with a greater than 90% risk for elbow injury. Subsequently, the airbag was re-designed in an effort to mitigate this as well as the other upper extremity injury risks. Part III assessed the enhanced side airbag module to ensure injury risks had been reduced prior to implementing the new system. To facilitate this, 12 enhanced side airbag deployments were conducted using the same procedures as Part I. Results indicate that the re-designed side airbag has effectively mitigated elbow injury risks induced by the original side airbag design. It is anticipated that this study will provide researchers with additional injury criteria for assessing upper extremity injury risk caused by both military and automotive side airbag deployments. / Master of Science

Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2010. / Motion palpation is an examination technique commonly used by chiropractors to identify a manipulable subluxation prior to manipulation. In order for its continued use, it must be validated. Many studies conducted on motion palpation’s inter-examiner reliability in the spine have shown it to be below average, however only a few studies have addressed its use in the extremity joints. No inter-examiner reliability studies on motion palpation were found for the elbow, let alone the symptomatic elbow with regards to chronic lateral epicondylalgia, a common disorder of the elbow effectively treated by the use of manipulation. Objectives The objectives of this study were to determine the inter-examiner reliability of motion palpation of the elbow for the asymptomatic elbow and the symptomatic elbow with regards to chronic lateral epicondylalgia. It also aimed to compare these results to determine any difference in reliability, the number of manipulable subluxations and the presence of manipulable subluxations in particular directions, between the two groups. Method Twenty participants (n=40 elbows) between the ages of 18 to 65, with one asymptomatic and one symptomatic elbow (chronic lateral epicondylalgia) were examined by three final year masters chiropractic students for the presence of manipulable subluxations in end play, using only motion palpation. The examiners were pre-trained, randomised and blinded. Each examiner individually motion palpated both elbows on each participant, in nine directions of motion palpation, incorporating the humeroulnar and proximal radioulnar joints. They were also required to identify which elbow was symptomatic. Fleiss’ kappa and percentage agreement (perfect percentage agreement and mean percentage agreement) were used to measure reliability. Paired non parametric Wilcoxon signed ranks compared the difference between both groups and McNemar’s chi square tests assessed the percentage of correctly identified symptomatic elbows for each examiner. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. iv Results The asymptomatic elbows showed a poor range of kappa results, from 0.0683 to -0.1321, with a mean kappa of -0.0664. Perfect percentage agreement was 50% to 85% and mean percentage agreement was 83.30% to 94.99%. The symptomatic elbows’ kappa values ranged between -0.2691 to 0.4034 with a mean kappa of -0.0028. The humeroulnar medial to lateral direction of motion palpation had a moderate kappa value of 0.4034. Perfect percentage agreement ranged from 10% to 85% and mean percentage agreement from 69.94% to 94.99%. There was an insignificant difference in kappa values between the two groups (p=0.260), although there was a trend towards the asymptomatic kappa values being lower than the symptomatic values. The difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic elbows was significant in proximal radioulnar posterior to anterior glide in pronation (p=0.013), as well as proximal radioulnar rotation of the radial head on the ulna (p=0.008). Overall, more manipulable subluxations were found in the symptomatic elbows than in the asymptomatic elbows. The examiners correctly identified the symptomatic elbow in 65% to 90% of participants (p=1.000). Conclusions and Recommendations In conclusion, the inter-examiner reliability of motion palpation in the asymptomatic elbow was poor, and in the symptomatic elbow (chronic lateral epicondylalgia), poor to moderate. There was an insignificant difference in reliability between the two groups, although more manipulable subluxations were found in the symptomatic elbows overall. These were mainly in proximal radioulnar posterior to anterior glide in pronation, as well as proximal radioulnar rotation of the radial head on the ulna, two directions of motion that form part of Mills’ manipulation. This study also found that examiners were able to identify the symptomatic elbows with the use of motion palpation. It is recommended that future research continue from this study in assessing the identification and presence of manipulable subluxations in all the extremity joints. However the methodological problems with the statistical analysis need to be addressed.

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2012. / Lateral epicondylalgia (L.E) is a common diagnosis in elbow pathology. The aetiology is poorly understood but it is generally accepted to be as a result of repetitive microtrauma, affecting the proximal end of the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon. Elbow bracing and exercise modification are often utilised by sufferers in order to reduce symptoms. In addition, there have been multiple treatment regimes used in practice to treat L.E, but none has stood out as being more effective than another. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the relative clinical effectiveness of therapeutic exercises alone and in combination with orthotic bracing, in terms of subjective and objective clinical findings. Methods This stratified, quantitative, prospective clinical trial consisted of two equal groups (n=15) diagnosed with L.E. Group One consisted of a strengthening and stretching programme alone, and Group Two consisted of a combination of the same programme and an orthotic brace. The participants performed the programme daily at home for six weeks, and the brace was worn throughout the day for six weeks. Each participant was assessed before, during and after the programme, in terms of subjective and objective clinical data which was then statistically analysed using SPSS version 18. Repeated measures ANOVA testing was also used to compare the outcomes between the groups over the time points. Results Both groups showed significant statistical improvement in terms of all the outcome measures. The groups also showed a clinically significant improvement for all the outcome measures except pressure pain threshold where Group Two showed clinically significant improvement over Group One. v Conclusion The results show that there was negligible benefit when combining an orthotic brace with therapeutic exercises as opposed to performing the therapeutic exercises alone.

The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is the primary restraint against valgus forces at the elbow. This structure cannot support the entire load placed upon the medial elbow during overhand throwing motions such as pitching a baseball. In this study we measured the contributions that different muscle groups make to the stability of the medial elbow, under conditions intended to reproduce the loads during pitching by varying the forearm position and loading conditions. We also evaluated the strength of the elbow musculature for the possibility of a training effect in the dominant arm of 11 male high school baseball pitchers. We collected surface EMG data in the two forearm positions to determine if the different positions used in various pitches have an effect on muscular action. We also tested an isometric and dissipative loading condition to determine if the muscles activity was load reactive. The four muscle groups tested were the flexor-pronator group (FP), the extensor-supinator group (ES), the tricep brachii (TB), and the pectoralis major (PM). We found significantly (p-value=0.001) higher peak activity levels of the flexor-pronator group in the neutral forearm position (79.4% MVIC �� 27.0% MVIC full trial peak, 30.8% MVIC �� 20.8% MVIC initial l50ms peak following activation) when compared to the supinated position (55.5% MVIC �� 29.6% MVIC full trial peak, 16.9% MVIC �� 14.8% MVIC initial l50ms peak following activation), which may explain the link between breaking pitches and medial elbow injury. We found an increase (p-value=0.001) in force output of the dominant arm (49.3 N/kg �� 12.5 N/kg) over the non-dominant arm (38.1 N/kg �� 11.0 N/kg). This finding is attributed to a training effect, which assists in protecting the elbow. These findings help provide baseline muscle activity information on protection of the medial soft tissue structures of the elbow. / Graduation date: 2004

Andreas Starke Quantifizierung und Klassifizierung der kaninen Ellbogeninkongruenz auf Grundlage einer standardisierten Röntgen- und Messmethode Klinik für Kleintiere der Veterinärmedizinischen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig (79 Seiten, 27 Abbildungen, 8 Tabellen, 132 Literaturangaben) Zielstellung: Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war die objektive Quantifizierung der knöchernen Konformation des Ellbogengelenkes gesunder und erkrankter Hunde unter standardisierten Bedingungen. Dazu sollte eine Methode entwickelt werden mit der Röntgenaufnahmen von Ellbogen unter Belastung angefertigt und anhand von Messungen an markanten Knochenstrukturen evaluiert werden können. Diese standardisierte Röntgen- und Messmethode sollte an einer Kontrollgruppe getestet werden, um die Eignung der Methodik zu untersuchen und Referenzwerte zu erstellen. Besonderer Schwerpunkt war die Überprüfung der Reliabilität der Messungen in Abhängigkeit von Lagerungsartefakten und Messwiederholungen. Danach sollten Ellbogengelenke klinisch erkrankter Hunde untersucht und mit den Ergebnissen der Kontrollgruppe verglichen werden, um herauszufinden, ob sich die Messergebnisse signifikant von gesunden Gelenken unterscheiden. Zudem wurde die Hypothese aufgestellt, dass sich die dysplastischen Ellbogengelenke anhand der röntgenologischen Messparameter in unterschiedliche Formen der humeroulnaren und humeroradialen Inkongruenz unterteilen lassen. Material und Methode: Bei 27 lahmheitsfreien Hunden wurden von 47 Ellbogengelenken Röntgenaufnahmen mit und ohne Belastung (mediolateral, kraniokaudal; Aufnahmen am liegenden, narkotisierten Tier) sowie Aufnahmen im Stehen (kraniokaudal) untersucht. Digital gemessen wurden subchondrale Gelenkspaltenabstände, subchondrale Knochenabstände und ein Winkel. Anschließend wurden 149 Hunde mit ED der Röntgen- und Messmethode unterzogen und mit den Ergebnissen der Kontrollgruppe verglichen. Anhand von gehäuft auftretenden Messwertabweichungen wurden die 149 Hunde in Untergruppen eingeteilt und erneut mit der Kontrollgruppe verglichen. Danach wurden 4 Gruppen mit jeweils unterschiedlicher Osteotomie an Radius bzw. Ulna zur zwei- und dreidimensionalen Gelenkumstellung erstellt (euthanasierte Hunde ohne Ellbogenerkrankung), der gleichen Röntgen- und Messprozedur unterzogen und mit der Kontrollgruppe und den Gruppen der kranken Hunde verglichen. Ergebnisse: Eine standardisierte und reliable Lagerung sowie Längen- und Winkelmessungen an definierten Knochenpunkten konnten mit und ohne Belastung bei gesunden und kranken Hunden etabliert werden. Mittels Normalisierung der Parameter der Längenmessungen gelang eine Vergleichbarkeit zwischen unterschiedlichen Gelenken und Projektionsebenen herzustellen. Messwerte von Aufnahmen im Stehen zeigten viele Lagerungsartefakte und eine geringe Reliabilität. Von den einzelnen Messparametern der Aufnahmen mit und ohne Belastung konnten aufgrund ihrer geringen Streuung Normwerte von der Kontrollgruppe abgeleitet werden. Eine deutliche Abgrenzung auf Grundlage signifikanter Unterschiede führte zur Bildung der Untergruppen Typ I (n=60), Typ II (n=40) und indiff (n=49) innerhalb der 149 Hunde mit ED. Unterscheidungskriterien für die Einteilung eines kranken Ellbogengelenkes in Typ I, Typ II und indiff waren 3 subchondrale Gelenkspaltenabstände (mp3, mp4, mp6), 3 aus Gelenkspaltenabständen errechnete Indizes (LI 3, LI 4, LI 6) und ein Winkel. Diese Parameter wiesen in der Kontrollgruppe eine hohe Reliabilität auf. Durch die Osteotomiemodelle konnten Parallelen zwischen Typ I und einer short ulna sowie zwischen Typ II und einem short radius ermittelt werden. Schlussfolgerungen: Röntgenaufnahmen am stehenden Hund sind nicht praktikabel, nur bedingt auswertbar und daher nicht geeignet. Anhand von Röntgenbildern mit und ohne Belastung lassen sich dagegen die Knochenverhältnisse im Gelenk beschreiben und Normwerte erstellen. Die untersuchte Methodik ist geeignet 67% erkrankter Tiere einem Inkongruenztyp (Typ I oder Typ II) zuzuordnen. Die Ergebnisse der dreidimensionalen Ulnaverkürzung und dreidimensionalen Radiusverkürzung weisen auf dreidimensionale Bewegungen der Knochenoberflächen bei Typ I bzw. Typ II im und am Gelenk hin. Ob Ellbogengelenke des Typ I (40%) von einer dreidimensionalen Osteotomie der proximalen Ulna und Ellbogengelenke des Typ II (27%) von einer Radiuselongation profitieren würden, müssen weitere Untersuchungen zeigen. Die Inkongruenz selbst konnte nicht näher quantifiziert werden. / Andreas Starke Quantification and classification of canine elbow incongruency using a standardized method for radiography and measurement Department of Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitiy of Leipzig (79 pages, 27 Figures, Tables, 132 references) Objective: Goal of this paper was the objective quantification of elbowjoint conformation for healthy and diseased dogs under standardized conditions. Therefor we developed a method for taking x-rays of the elbow joint under load to facilitate measurements using bone-landmarks. For this we aimed to test a standardized X-ray- and measurement methodology on a control group for evaluation of the developed methodology and to compile reference values. Emphasis has been placed on the validation of the reliability of the taken measurements especially were positioning artefacts and repeat measurements were concerned. Subsequently we examined elbow joints of clinically affected dogs and compared the results to that of the control group to determine whether signifikant differences can be found in the measurements compared to those taken in joints of healthy dogs. Additionally we formulated the hypothesis that displastic Elbow joints can be grouped into humero-ulnar and humero-radial incongruencies using the developed method of measurement. Material and methods: Plain x-rays and standardized stressed x-rays (medio-lateral, cranio-caudal taken under sedation; cranio-caudal views taken while standing) of 47 elbow-joints of 27 lameness free dogs were examined. We digitally measured subchondral jointgaps, subchondral bone gaps and an angle. Afterwards 149 dogs with ED were examined using our standardized X-ray method and we compared the results to the control group. The 149 dogs were divided into subgroups using frequent measurement deviances and the subgroups again compared to the control group. Afterwards we created 4 groups based on the kind of radial or ulnar osteotomy for two- and three- dimensional joint adjustment, took measurements based on our standardized X-ray method and compared the results to the control group and ED group. Results: A reliable standardized X-ray methodology as well as length and angle measurement on defined bone landmarks with and without load could be established on healthy dogs and those with ED. Using normalization of length-measurements we were able to establish comparability between different joints and projections. Measurements from x-rays taken in a standing position showed a lot of positioning related artefacts and low reliability. We were able to compile standard values from x-rays of the control group taken with- and without load due to the low deviation of the norm values. Due to marked delination based on significant differences we were able to establish subgroups Typ I (n=60), Typ II (n=40) and Group indiff (n=49) in the ED Group. Distinction Criterions to classify an ED elbow joint in Types I, II or indiff were 3 subchondral jointgaps (mp3, mp4, mp6), three indices calculated out of joint gaps (LI 3, LI 4 and LI 6) and an angle. In the control group these parameters showed a high reliability. Using an osteotomy model we were able to draw parallels between Typ I and a short Ulna, as well as Typ II and a short radius. Conclusions: X-rays taken in a standing position are not feasible. Using x-rays taken with and without load we were able to adequately describe bone-marker relations and could compile norm values. Using our developed method we have been able to assign 67% of the examined diseased joints to a type of incongruency (Type I or II). The results of three dimensional ulna and radius shortening indicate three dimensional movement of the bone surface in Typ I or II in the joint. Whether elbow joints of Typ I (40%) benefit of a three dimensional proximal ulna-osteotomy or joints of Typ II (27%) would benefit of a radial elongation needs to be shown in further studies.