No / The misinterpretation of radiographs is recognised as a key source of emergency department (ED) errors, regardless of clinician profession. This article compares ENP and medical staff accuracy in the interpretation of musculoskeletal trauma X-rays between immediate and delayed radiology reporting pathways. The data for this study was drawn from a larger pragmatic randomized controlled trial of immediate reporting. Patients were recruited and randomly assigned to immediate or delayed reporting arms and treated according to group assignment. Image interpretive accuracy between ED staff groups and arms was undertaken together with an assessment of the influence of immediate reporting on patient pathways and journey times. Six hundred and seventy-four radiographic examinations were performed (598 patients). There was a significant reduction in the interpretive errors in the immediate reporting arm for all ED clinicians (proportional difference = 4.2%; 95% CI [0.017,0.068]; p = 0.001), but no significant difference in proportion of interpretive errors was evident between ENPs and medical staff. Patient journey times, discharge and referral rates were not significantly different between study arms, although admission rates varied for medical staff collectively. ENP X-ray interpretation accuracy is comparable with that of medical staff, but immediate reporting was seen to reduce errors without increasing patient journey times.

No / Background: Many accident and emergency clinicians regard the radiographic image as an extension of the clinical examination, as a provisional diagnosis, based on clinical signs and symptoms, can be confirmed or refuted by inspection of X-rays. However, the value of radiography in this context is not determined by the actual presence of trauma or pathology on the radiograph, but is dependent on the ability of a clinician to identify any trauma or pathology present. Traditionally, the responsibility for interpreting radiographic images within the accident and emergency environment in the United Kingdom (UK) has been with medical clinicians. However, expansion of the nursing role has begun to change the boundaries of professional practice and now many nurses are both requesting and interpreting trauma radiographs. Aim: To ascertain the ability of accident and emergency doctors and nurses to interpret trauma radiographs, and identify whether there is a consistent standard of interpretive accuracy that could be used as a measure of competence. Methods: A literature review was conducted using the Cochrane Library, Medline and CINAHL databases and the keywords radiographic interpretation, radiographic reporting, accident and emergency and emergency/nurse practitioner. Findings: The ability of accident and nursing doctors and nurses to interpret trauma radiographs accurately varies markedly, and no identified published study has established an appropriate level of accuracy that should be achieved in order to demonstrate satisfactory competence in the interpretation of radiographic images. Conclusions: Determining a measure of interpretive accuracy that can be used to assess ability to interpret radiographic trauma images is fraught with difficulties. Consequently, nurses may attempt to prove their skills by directly comparing their abilities to those of their medical colleagues. However, as a result of marked variation in the ability of senior house officers to interpret trauma radiographs, a similar ability does not automatically imply that a satisfactory level of ability has been achieved.

Access to health care in rural communities is challenged by workforce shortages. Nurse practitioners (NPs) have been filling the gap created by physician migration into specialty areas. Flex hospital legislation allows critical access hospitals (CAHs) to staff the emergency department with NPs or physician assistants without on-site physicians. NP education often lacks emergency and trauma curriculum, resulting in gaps in education and practice expectations and leading to significant role transition stress and turnover. The purpose of this project was to construct an evidence-based transition-to-practice residency program to support NPs providing emergency department care in the CAH. Theoretical frameworks used to guide the project include rural health theory, novice to expert, and from limbo to legitimacy frameworks. Global outcomes include increased quality of care, patient safety, NP job satisfaction, and decreased turnover. The quality improvement initiative engaged an interprofessional team of institutional and community stakeholders (n = 10) to develop primary products including the residency program, curriculum modules, and the secondary products necessary to implement and evaluate the project. Implementation will consist of a pilot followed by expansion throughout the rural health network. Evaluation will involve the CAH dashboard to monitor patient outcomes, Misener NP job satisfaction scale, and employee turnover rates. The project expands understanding of the on-boarding needs of rural NPs. The results of this project will serve as a guide to publish outcome data and collaborate with higher education to develop programs to award academic credit for paid clinical experiences leading to academic degrees.

Introduction : Trauma is the leading cause of death in patients between the ages of 1-44 years in South Africa. Taking these statistics into consideration it is essential to better resuscitation strategies in order to improve outcome of trauma patients. Compensated and uncompensated haemorrhagic shock is frequently under diagnosed in trauma patients, which has a definitive effect on mortality. Concerns about inadequate monitoring of patients through the use of only physiological end points are raised. Methods : A comprehensive literature review was conducted on resuscitation strategies for patients presenting with haemorrhagic shock. Physiological and metabolic end points of resuscitation were identified to guide resuscitation strategies. A quantitative, retrospective, non-experimental, descriptive, correlational and crosssectional research design was chosen for this study. Data was collected by using biophysical measures, namely clinical audit checklists. Results : Lactate was identified as a good indicator to predicting mortality in patients presenting with shock caused by haemorrhage. Special consideration to patients’ age and physiological status should be made during resuscitation. The consequence of delayed resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock patients is associated with an increase in mortality that can be prevented. It is found that serum blood lactate levels taken over time are good predictors of patient survival rates. Patients presenting with a raised serum blood lactate level for more than 24-hours has an increase in mortality rate. Conclusion : Emergency nurse practitioners are responsible for the monitoring of patients admitted to the emergency unit with haemorrhagic shock. The use of serum lactate levels during the first 24-hours of the resuscitation of patients with haemorrhage can assist with the implementation of strategies to reverse the effect haemorrhagic shock on cellular level in these patients. / Dissertation (MCur)--University of Pretoria, 2011. / Nursing Science / unrestricted