The overall aim of this study is to determine the impact of text and language in the form of how political speech can affect and form a discourse that excludes a certain category of people and how such an exclusion leads to exercise of power beyond normal, democratic rules of state intervention towards said group of people. This is a case study investigating the drug war of the Philippines, initiated by the country’s president Rodrigo Duterte, and his speeches related to the drug issue. The method of use is discourse analysis and the study is based upon the international relations theory of securitization by the so called Copenhagen School, consisting of Barry Buzan, Ole Wæver & Jaap de Wilde. Among the key findings are the picture of a discourse, formed by political speech, where individuals using or dealing with drugs are described as a threat is a central aspect, alongside with discursive elements such as a collective identity, human rights aspects, economic arguments, the future of the nation, certain values and the judicial system. These elements and values are given meaning as reference objects and within the discourse that makes them part of the establishment of a notion where people who use or deal with drugs are regarded as a threat and therefore can be legitimate subjects of exercise of power outside of the normal rules of democratic authority. Keywords: securitization, drugs, Philippines, discourse analysis, Copenhagen School, extra- judicial executions, otherness.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:27:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Volnei Luiz Denardi-Dissertacao Texto Integral.pdf: 1227600 bytes, checksum: 3f978c6df74e38220b20c77f93afa7d5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-05-19 / Tribunal Regional Federal da Terceira Região / The development of the topic judicial and extra-judicial executions in the Housing Financial Systems, governed by Law No. 5741/71 and by Law-Decree No. 70/66, respectively, has as main object to deal with the polemic issues involving these procedures, created under a regime of exception with the purpose of promoting the economic and social development. Although much quicker than the traditional legal procedures, reaching the so much desired scope by means of an alternative and quick way of solving conflicts, the extra-judicial execution still arises controversies in legal scholarship and case law, even over nearly 40 years after the enactment of Law-Decree No. 70/66. Notwithstanding the favorable standpoint taken by the Federal Supreme Court, the constitutional aspects of this procedure still are under discussion, thereby originating issues related to the due process of law, from which issues related to contestation, impartiality and natural judge are derived. No less effective, the procedure established by Law No. 5741/71, destined to the special mortgage execution of contracts entered into within the Housing Financial System, differentiating it from the common procedure of the Civil Procedural Code in face of the suppression of some execution acts, as well as of the limitation of the borrower s equity liability to the excussion of the property mortgaged in the loan contract collateralized by a mortgage. In the special mortgage execution, the debtor can submit the same defenses applicable to the common execution procedure against a solvent debtor contemplated by the Civil Procedural Code, such as debtor s embargoes, intraprocedural defense, and defenses carried out through autonomous information actions. We can highlight, as to the means of defense, the non-suspensivity of debtor s embargoes until the mortgaged property disoccupation. / O desenvolvimento do tema execuções judicial e extrajudicial no Sistema Financeiro da Habitação, disciplinadas na Lei nº 5.741/71 e no Decreto-lei nº 70/66, respectivamente, tem como objetivo fundamental tratar das questões polêmicas que envolvem esses procedimentos, criados em época de regime de exceção com o escopo de promover o desenvolvimento econômico e social. Embora muito mais célere do que os procedimentos judiciais tradicionais, atingindo o tão almejado escopo por forma alternativa ágil na resolução de conflitos, a execução extrajudicial ainda desperta controvérsias na doutrina e na jurisprudência, mesmo depois de quase 40 anos da promulgação do Decreto-lei nº 70/66. Não obstante a posição favorável assumida pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, ainda são discutidos os aspectos constitucionais desse procedimento, surgindo daí questões relacionadas ao princípio do devido processo legal, do qual decorrem o do contraditório, o da imparcialidade e o do juiz natural. Não menos efetivo o procedimento estabelecido na Lei nº 5.741/71, destinado à execução especial hipotecária dos contratos firmados no âmbito do Sistema Financeiro da Habitação, diferenciando-se do procedimento comum do Código de Processo Civil em face da supressão de alguns atos executivos, como pela limitação da responsabilidade patrimonial do mutuário à excussão do bem hipotecado no contrato de mútuo garantido por hipoteca. Na execução especial hipotecária, o devedor pode oferecer as mesmas defesas cabíveis no procedimento comum de execução contra devedor solvente do Código de Processo Civil, como os embargos do devedor, defesa intraprocessual e a realizada por meio de ações autônomas de conhecimento. Destaca-se, quanto aos meios de defesa, a não suspensividade dos embargos do devedor até a desocupação do imóvel hipotecado.