Family Interventions (FI) are recommended in the treatment of psychosis. This is based on the robust finding that a high rating of Expressed Emotion (EE) is predictive of poor outcome. Research has looked to attachment and attribution theories to further develop our understanding of EE. This study sought to understand how the experience of FI helped family members to develop their thinking about their attachment experiences and the appraisals made about a relative, and how these discussions helped to inform their understanding about the interactional way in which difficulties could be maintained. Six master themes were identified: ‘the significance of the therapeutic relationship’, ‘understanding relationships with significant others’, ‘developing a sense of agency’, ‘making sense of psychosis/difficulties’, ‘exploring and understanding unhelpful patterns of interaction in the family’, and the ‘mechanisms of therapy that were helpful’. The FI was experienced as helpful in bringing about changes in the way family members construed each other and psychosis. This influenced patterns of relating which allowed for an emotional climate within the family that promoted a sense of agency and was experienced as healing.

There is minimal research into behavioural interventions for typically developing preschoolers (2-5 years of age) with sleep problems. Often these children are not considered as a distinct developmental group and are incorporated into sleep intervention studies for infants or school-aged children. Yet preschoolers do differ in their language, social and cognitive abilities. The present study examines an intervention tailored to the developmental abilities of four preschool children with sleep problems. It utilised positive reinforcement in order to create a less restrictive intervention than those based on extinction alone. This was combined with a range of other behavioural strategies such as parental presence, standard and graduated extinction to reduce a variety of sleep problems. Problems targeted included bedtime refusal, co-sleeping, night waking and a possible diagnosis of sleep terrors. Behavioural interventions effectively reduced sleep problems in all four participants. Parental report demonstrated acceptance of strategies implemented and satisfaction in intervention outcomes.

Background: Reviews of primary research in developed countries and policy in the UK demonstrate there is a lack of evidence from well conducted RCTs on lifestyle interventions for childhood obesity (NICE 2006, SIGN 2003, Oude Luttikhuis et al. 2009). Objectives: To develop, implement and evaluate the Y W8? family focused childhood obesity treatment programme using a randomized controlled trial. Methods: The programme was developed using Bartholomew’s Intervention Mapping framework. Using this stepped process a needs analysis was undertaken, a steering group formed, focus groups were completed in local schools and interviews took place with parents of obese children. The determinants identified by these processes were combined with relevant theories and information gathered through a literature review to develop the programme. Y W8? is a 12 week course for families with children aged 8–13 years designed to assist with weight management. The RCT was designed as an individually randomised parallel-group trial with a waiting-list control group. Children in the intervention group (n=59) had their height, weight, self-reported physical activity levels, self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption and a measure of self-esteem recorded at pre- and post-assessment, whilst only height and weight was collected from the children in the control group (n=55). Results: Twelve week (post course) results showed a significant difference in change in BMI z-score between the control and intervention group, mean difference = -0.12 (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.16, F (1, 98) = 54.04, p < 0.0005), with the control group increasing and the intervention group decreasing their BMI z-score. Analysis showed this positive effect on weight status did not adversely affect linear growth. For the intervention group 81% of children completed the programme. Implications: This RCT offers evidence to support the use of family-based treatment programmes in the treatment of childhood obesity and displays positive results in the short-term, at a lower cost than similar interventions. The thesis also demonstrates how a public health programme can be implemented and sustained in routine NHS practice.

Background: While literature indicates a positive impact of family interventions (FIs) on people with experience of psychosis, less is known about outcomes for other family members involved with these interventions. Furthermore, there is a paucity of literature offering an understanding of how young people with a parent with experience of psychosis view themselves in relation to their parent’s care. In the context of community care for psychosis, consideration of family views and outcomes is important in establishing how their needs may best be met. Aim: The thesis aims were twofold: (a) to systematically review the literature to explore the impact of single FIs for psychosis on family members, establish whom outcomes are being gathered for, and to what extent children and young people are involved; and (b) to develop an understanding of how young people with a parent with experience of psychosis conceptualise themselves in the context of their parent’s care. Method: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in October, 2016. Additionally, 12 interviews were carried out with 11 young people (aged 14-18 years) with a parent with experience of psychosis. A grounded theory approach was employed. Results: 21 studies were included in the systematic review. 86% revealed at least one positive outcome for family members engaging with FIs. None of the studies included children or young people. In the empirical study, a provisional theory was generated and at the core of this is how young people establish and negotiate their role in relation to their parent’s care in the context of adolescence; balancing caring for and/or living with a parent with experience of psychosis with “being a teenager”. This process appears dependent on young people’s perception of parental needs and supports and among other factors, seems to be facilitated by having appropriate information (that is specific and formulation based). Young people perceiving adults to view them as “too young” appears to be a significant barrier to this. Conclusion: The systematic review points towards a generally positive impact of FIs on family members but involvement of children and young people is lacking. The empirical study highlights that parental psychosis appears to pose additional and unique challenges to young people, particularly in the context of adolescent development; emphasising the need for better support, appropriate information sharing and adults recognising and validating young people’s experiences. Future research would benefit from the exploration of inclusion of children and young people in FIs.

A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Community Psychology in the Department of Psychology University of Zululand, 2006. / This study was aimed at improving knowledge, attitude and practices of teachers, parents and learners on HIV/AIDS issues in Mthatha schools in Eastern Cape. The specific objective was to promote mental health in the form of improved family communication about HIV/AIDS issues and also to promote the value of psychological interventions among Xhosa families in the Eastern Cape. The target population was drawn among teachers and families of the learners in two schools (urban and rural) in the Mthatha district of Eastern Cape. All participants were given an HTV/AIDS life skills intervention programme for about nine weeks. Quantitative data was collected from a structured questionnaire and qualitative data from a focus group interview. The findings revealed a general improvement in HIV/AIDS knowledge, attitude and practices. Teachers seemed to be more knowledgeable than parents and learners with regard to HIV/AIDS issues. Learners manifested resistance to change in their practices though all participants preferred abstinence or safer sex than the use of condom. Learners seemed resistant to change sexual practices though all participants preferred abstinence or safer sex above condom usage.

This article is a demonstration of how an implementation-science (IS) framework can be coupled with the measurement of implementation outcomes to effectively integrate evidence-based family interventions in primary care. The primary care environment presents a number of challenges for successfully integrating such interventions. However, IS methods can improve the prospect of successfully implementing a new intervention while simultaneously and rigorously evaluating the impact on salient outcomes. We used our experiences across 2 pilot trials in which the family check-up (Smith, Montaño, Mauricio, Berkel, & Dishion, 2016), an evidence-based family intervention, was integrated into primary care. In these pilot trials, the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment (EPIS) framework and the Proctor et al. taxonomy of implementation outcomes were used to guide the implementation and evaluate its success. Grounding our presentation in our pilot work offers an illustration of applying the EPIS framework and outcomes measurement to real-world problems and contexts. When embarking on new efforts to integrate behavioral interventions into health-care settings, the application of IS frameworks and measurement strategies can create generalizable knowledge that substantively contributes to a sparse literature. Today, those “in the trenches” who are translating evidence-based interventions to their setting can contribute to the corpus of research in integrated care by using IS methods to plan a new program and evaluate its feasibility, adoption, and reach.

Les écrits rapportent qu’entre 10% et 40% des personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux ont présenté des comportements agressifs depuis l’établissement du diagnostic, et qu’entre 50% et 65% de ces comportements sont perpétrés envers les membres de la famille (Estroff et al., 1998). Or, les aidants naturels se sentent fréquemment démunis devant le comportement impulsif et agressif de leur proche atteint d’un trouble de santé mentale (Bonin & Lavoie-Tremblay, 2010) et la majorité des proches aidants ne reçoivent pas de soutien professionnel (Doornbos, 2001). À cet effet, une équipe de chercheurs et d’organismes communautaires ont mis sur pied un projet de formation adaptée par et pour les familles relativement à la gestion des comportements agressifs de leur proche atteint d’un trouble de santé mentale s’appuyant sur l’approche OMEGA communautaire (Bonin et al., 2011). La présente recherche est inspirée du modèle de Fresan et ses collaborateurs (2007), qui inclut les familles et leur proche atteint dans la prévention de la rechute et le rétablissement de ce dernier. Cette étude avait donc pour but de décrire et analyser, par un devis mixte, les perceptions de l’agressivité, du fonctionnement familial ainsi que de l’observance au traitement médical de personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux, suite à une formation de gestion des comportements agressifs adaptée par et pour des membres de familles, et suivie par leur proche aidant. Des questionnaires auto-administrés ont été remis et complétés par 25 personnes atteintes et comprenaient trois instruments qui étaient : 1. un questionnaire sociodémographique; 2. le Basis-24 (Eisen, 2007) permettant d’évaluer la condition mentale de la personne atteinte; 3. l’Échelle de perception de l’agressivité permettant de mesurer la fréquence et le niveau des comportements agressifs (De Benedictis et al., 2011); et 4. l'Échelle du fonctionnement familial permettant de mesurer le fonctionnement familial (Epstein, Baldwin, & Bishop, 1983). Des questions supplémentaires au questionnaire portaient sur l’observance au traitement médical et sur les changements observés. Des analyses descriptives et corrélationnelles bivariées ont été réalisées pour analyser les données quantitatives. Par la suite, des entrevues individuelles ont été réalisées auprès de huit personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux dont le membre de famille avait suivi la formation de gestion des comportements agressifs. La méthode d’analyse classique de Miles et Huberman (2003) a été utilisée pour réaliser l’analyse des données. L’analyse des données a permis de dégager les perceptions des personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux au regard de la formation de gestion des comportements agressifs que leur membre de famille avait suivi. Ainsi, le programme de formation OMÉGA adaptée par et pour les familles permettrait d’une part de diminuer l’agressivité et, d’autre part, d’améliorer le climat familial. De plus, selon les personnes atteintes, leur membre de famille était plus à l’écoute et faisait moins preuve d’intrusion, ce qui diminuaient les conflits et favorisaient une meilleure dynamique familiale. Cette étude a mis en évidence qu’il est nécessaire d’impliquer les familles dans les programmes de prévention de la rechute de la maladie mentale dans les soins de première ligne. Cette étude contribue ainsi à l’amélioration des connaissances sur la dynamique famille-patient et sur le rétablissement des personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux. Aussi, cette recherche propose des recommandations pour la recherche, la pratique, la formation et la gestion en sciences infirmières. / Literature reports that between 10% and 40% of people with mental disorders showed aggressive behavior since establishing the diagnosis, and between 50% and 65% of these behaviors are perpetrated against members of the family (Estroff et al. 1998). However, caregivers often feel helpless in the face of impulsive and aggressive behavior of their loved one with a mental health disorder (Bonin & Lavoie-Tremblay, 2010) and the majority of caregivers do not receive professional support (Doornbos, 2001). For this purpose, a team of researchers and community organizations have established a training adapted by and for families in relation to the management of aggressive behavior of their loved one with a mental health disorder based on Community OMEGA approach (Bonin et al., 2011). This research was inspired by the Fresan and collaborators' model (2007), which includes families and their loved ones achieved in the prevention of relapse and recovery thereof. Using a mixed-design, the study aimed to describe and analyze, perceptions of aggression, family functioning and adherence to medical treatment of people with mental disorders, following a training about aggressive behavior management training adapted by and for family members and to which their caregiver attended. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed and completed by 25 people and included three instruments: 1. a sociodemographic questionnaire; 2) the Basis-24 (Eisen, 2007) to assess the mental condition of the person; 3. the perception of aggressiveness scale (POAS) to measure the frequency and the level of aggressive behavior (De Benedictis et al., 2011; and 4. the family assessment device (FAD) to measure family functioning (Epstein, Baldwin, & Bishop, 1983). Additional questions to the questionnaire focused on adherence to medical treatment and the observed changes. Descriptive correlative analyzes and T-test were performed to analyze quantitative data. Thereafter, individual interviews were held with eight persons with mental disorders whose family member was trained in management of aggressive behavior. The classical method of analysis of Miles and Huberman (2003) was used to perform data analysis. The data analysis allowed to identified the perceptions of people with mental disorders with regard to training in managing aggressive behavior that their family member had followed. Thus, the OMEGA training program adapted by and for family members would help on the one hand reducing aggression and on the other hand, improve family atmosphere. Moreover, according to the persons with mental disorders, their family member was more attentive and less intrusive, which decreased conflict and promoted better family dynamics. This study has highlighted the need to involve families in prevention programs about relapse of mental illness in primary care. This study contributes to the improvement of knowledge on the patient and family dynamics and on the recovery of people with mental disorders. Also, this research provides recommendations for research, practice, education and management in nursing.

Research has indicated that offering support and services for people who experience mental health problems and their families is a complex and contested area. Despite the controversies surrounding therapeutic interventions with families, it has now been recognised that relatives and other supporters of people with mental health problems should be included in their care. Whole- family interventions and partnership working with carers and families is now central to secondary care UK mental health policies and clinical practice guidelines. However, for many families/ carers this remains an aspiration rather than a reality. The way in which we successfully developed family focused mental health practice, as well as specialist family interventions (FI) for people who have been given a diagnosis of psychosis, has therefore aroused considerable interest. The Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust has adopted a Strategy to Enhance Working Partnerships with Carers and Families, developed best practice guidance and has established two complementary workforce development projects - the development of specialist family intervention services and the widespread training of mental health staff to create a ‘triangle of care’ with service users and their families. This has resulted in widespread adoption of systemically informed, ‘whole-family’ practice. In response to the widespread difficulties experienced following other staff- training initiatives we developed specialist family interventions (FI) services by means of an innovative one-year course delivered in partnership with Plymouth University. This training initiative has been widely acknowledged for its novel integration of psycho-educational and systemic approaches and the effective in-situ, multi-disciplinary service development model. An advantage of this approach is that by the end of the course a local FI Service has been established and staff experience fewer difficulties in applying their new skills than people trained in other programmes. We then ensure the continued development of clinical skills by means of a service structure that emphasises on-going supervision. Regular audits of the service and in-depth research studies clearly indicate that the service is effective and highly valued by users. Our ‘cognitive-interactional’ approach, which integrates systemic therapy with psychosocial interventions (individual- and family-CBT) within a collaborative therapeutic relationship, enables us to meet the needs of families in a flexible, tailored manner. The FI teams are able to deliver early interventions for people with first episode psychosis, as well as meeting the NICE guidelines for people with longstanding symptoms. Recognising that many families do not require formal family interventions/ therapy, we also have been designing ‘stepped-care’ family intervention services. We have developed, and extensively evaluated, short training packages to enhance working partnerships with families throughout our mental health services. We have used this three-day package to train a range of community and inpatient teams. We have also encouraged family- inclusive practice with the establishment of a trustwide steering group, practice guidelines and the establishment of ‘family liaison’ posts to facilitate family meetings on inpatient units, as part of the assessment process. Both training initiatives explicitly focus on developing systemic thinking, by integrating CBT and systemic therapy. The involvement of families/ carers in the design and delivery of both training initiatives is also crucial.