The development of fin damage in Atlantic salmon parr was investigated using social network analysis of behavioural interactions occurring under different feeding and stocking conditions. Four separate experiments were carried out in which groups of fish were subjected to a long food restriction period (30 days) described in Chapter 2, high (30 kg/m3) or low (8 kg/m3) fish stocking densities (Chapter 3), predictable or unpredictable food delivery regime (Chapter 4) or a short food restriction period (10 days) described in Chapter 5. Dorsal fin damage (erosion, splits and fin index) was significantly higher in groups of fish subjected to food restriction periods (short and long), held at high stocking density (30 kg/m3) or with an unpredictable food delivery regime. No other fins were found to be affected by fin damage irrespective of the treatment. The social networks based on aggressive interactions showed higher centrality, clustering coefficients, in-degree centrality, out-degree centrality and less dense networks in groups subjected to food restriction (short and long), low stocking densities 8 kg/m3), and unpredictable food delivery. The high centralities and clustering coefficients indicated separation of fish within the groups into initiators of aggression and receivers of aggression. This separation of roles was seen only in the food restricted group, high density groups and unpredictable food delivery groups. Initiators had higher out-degree centrality while receivers showed high in-degree centrality. Also, initiators of aggressive interactions had less fin erosion, higher final weights and higher body lengths than receivers of aggression. The severity of fin damage was significantly higher when this role differentiation occurred, and it was highly correlated with fin biting events. Additionally, overall aggression was higher in food restricted groups, low density groups and unpredictable groups. The dynamic analyses of networks over time (Chapter 6) showed that fish classified as initiators of aggression did not change this behaviour after normal/control environmental conditions were restored (i.e. ad libitum food delivery, low stocking density or predictable food delivery). The latter result indicates that individual fish maintained their behaviour irrespective of their social context, which is consistent with the definition of behavioural syndromes, personalities or temperament defined for other non-human animals. Overall these studies demonstrated the importance of using social network analysis to clearly identify and quantify roles that individual fish assume within their network group and through time based on their behavioural interactions leading to dorsal fin damage and differential physical characteristics. The results are potentially applicable within the commercial aquaculture industry as a valuable technique to evaluate and improve the welfare of farmed fish.

There is an increasing scientific acceptance that fish may feel some sort of fear, pain and distress, which in turn feeds a growing concern for their welfare. Humans impact the wellbeing of a large number of fish in various ways, one of them being through research. Welfare legislation in the UK demand welfare considerations for all animals used in scientific procedures. Furthermore, welfare and enrichment needs for fish are included in the Appendix A of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Scientific Purposes. As fish are extensively used in research, changing their housing and husbandry to improve welfare is of importance, since fish kept in laboratories are most likely subjected to impoverished environments. Although enrichment programs have been shown to improve health and welfare in various animal species, little is known of their potential for application to juvenile rainbow trout. How best to improve barren experimental tanks for female juvenile rainbow trout used in regulatory research was the broad aim of this PhD. In this thesis, three enrichment strategies for rainbow trout have been examined, using physiological and behavioural welfare indicators. The first study assessed the effects of semitransparent shelters on trout welfare, and a clear message became evident; that shelters of this design should not be considered enrichment for rainbow trout as they had several significant negative impacts, indicating chronic stress in fish from shelter tanks relative to fish in a barren environment. The second study investigated impacts of reduced visual access to conspecifics in the same tank. Habitats with low visual contact between individuals have been suggested to reduce aggression for a range of species, and I have shown that visual barriers appeared to be beneficial to trout as well. The final experiment evaluated effects of high and low water currents on the wellbeing of rainbow trout, and results indicated increased fish welfare when water currents were supplied.

Pond harvesting is an integral part of fish farming procedures in pond culture and overall fish production. This study was aimed at the evaluation of environmental conditions during pond harvesting, based on the comparison of values monitored in the trawl-net with fish located in a harvesting pit and outside it. The monitored parametres comprised the oxygen content and saturation, temperature, pH, conductivity and turbidity. The monitoring was performed on three autumn harvests (Potěšil, Rod, Jaroslavický dolní) and two spring harvests (Vrbenský přední and Vrbenský nový), always during the fish removal from the net (seine). The monitored determinants were recorded in 30-min intervals inside the net with fish and outside it in 15m distance. During the statistical comparision of the oxygen content and saturation in the net and outside it with the count on fish biomass was statistically signifiant differences in the four of twelve raids evaluated, which means keeping fishes in the net during the yielding was adequately treated by installation of fresh water jet.When the fresh water jet had been stopped worsen of the conditions in the fish net and even in the harvesting pit appeared.

tesis por compendios / El objetivo de esta tesis doctoral es investigar los ritmos diarios de comportamiento alimentario e indicadores de bienestar en la dorada. Este objetivo general se aborda en 3 áreas temáticas interrelacionadas: selección dietaria, sincronización al horario de alimentación e indicadores de bienestar. El nexo común gira en torno al estudio de los ritmos de alimentación en la dorada, mediante el empleo de comederos a demanda en los cuales el pez es capaz de elegir libremente la cantidad y el momento en el cual desea alimentarse, y si dispone de más de un comedero a demanda, realizar selección dietaria y decidir el tipo de alimento; o bien mediante comederos automáticos que permiten estudiar el efecto sincronizador del horario de alimentación. La alimentación además juega un papel clave en el bienestar de los peces, cuya evaluación requiere considerar los ritmos de indicadores fisiológicos de estrés y el comportamiento alimentario de los peces.

An optimal method for stunning animals before slaughter should result in instantaneous and irreversible insensibility. Today, there are various stunning and slaughter practices used around the world for farmed fish. With aquaculture being a growing food sector, the welfare of the animals used has become increasingly important in the consciousness of consumers, researchers and regulatory bodies. With growing research into the subject matter, an overview to summarize and examine how these practices impact on the welfare of the fish, and how well they conform to animal welfare legislation, is warranted to minimize the suffering of farmed fish. Stunning practices used in aquaculture include methods such as electrical and percussive stunning, carbon dioxide and asphyxiation. Each with its own level of effectiveness in terms of how fast the method results in loss of consciousness, whether or not the effect is reversible and how the welfare of the fish is affected as determined by behavioural and physiological stress responses. It was concluded that there is no unambiguous answer as to which stunning method is optimal in regard to animal welfare in modern day aquaculture. The optimal method for a given facility is influenced by factors like practicalities relating to each individual method as well as legislation on EU and national level. Suggestions were made for future research.