The fish farming industry faces some problems for the future as the escaping of fish and fish lice. One solution to these problems could be to move the farms further offshore. The main focus of the industry is on the cages the fish is held in, but the feed barge is the brain of a fish farm. Before offshore fish farming is an acceptable solution for the future the design criteria for the feed barge has to be sufficient for more exposed areas.Some regulations both for fish farming and the oil industry have been evaluated. The conclusion from the evaluation of the regulations is that the regulation for floating fish farms is the least strict regulation. The purpose of this report is to enlighten the need for new thinking for design criteria for offshore feed barges by doing a hydrodynamic analysis in HydroD by using WADAM and potential theory applied to a panel model. The computer program is a recognized program developed by DNV. The model in this report is a design which is believed to be the best design for exposed areas. The model is analyzed in both hydrostatic and hydrodynamic conditions. The hydrostatic analyses conclude that the barge is stable and valid for operation in Norwegian waters. For the hydrodynamic analysis it as assumed two different locations with different wave data to enlighten the need to design a barge to a specific location. There is also assumed extra restoring as simulation of mooring. The result from the hydrodynamic analyses is used to evaluate the required freeboard for each location and the motions and accelerations of the barge. The results show that the barge in both locations will experience water on deck already for significant wave height of 2 meters, which actually is low even for the regulations today. The rotation and acceleration results are compared against limits for human tolerance and they show that there is a need for evaluating this in the design criteria.The conclusion is that the regulation valid today for fish farming is insufficient for offshore fish farming and that it is possible to look towards the offshore industry for leads on how the regulations should be formed. For the future it would be appropriate to change the design criteria and design of the feed barge if the fish farming is to be moved further offshore.

<p>Ekosystembaserad förvaltning bygger på en helhetlig syn på ekosystemen och dess förhållande till mänsklig aktivitet. Förvaltningsplanen för Barents hav utanför Norge är ett de längst framskridna försöken till implementering av denna förvaltningsmodell. Lång väg återstår dock för att uppnå de målsättningar som satts och särskilt gäller detta miljömålet för biologisk mångfald. Trots att fiskeri utpekats som den största påverkningsfaktorn på biologisk mångfald har det varit lite fokus på fiskeriernas negativa konsekvenser i arbetet med förvaltningsplanen. Den här uppsatsen försöker ge en bild av hur personer som jobbar inom förvaltningen ser på värdet med förvaltningsplanen, hur de uppfattar dess brister, och just varför de tror att fiskeriet negativa konsekvenser fått liten uppmärksamhet.</p><p>Helhetlighet och tvärsektoriellt samarbete kunde konkluderas som de främsta värdena med förvaltningsplanen. Organisationsproblem, konservatism och maktkamper ansågs dock skapa problem för implementering och samarbete över sektorerna, bland annat genom genom dålig kommunikation mellan utredningsgrupper och den implementerande organisationen. Konservatism och maktkamp uttrycktes i form av en ovillighet från andra att samarbeta över sektorerna, att bryta det sektoriella tankesättet, och en vilja att värna om sin maktsfär.  Strukturella problem lyftes även fram som en av de bakomliggande anledninganar till att fiskeriernas negativa effekter inte fått mer fokus. Starkt kulturellt fäste, fokus på petroleumsverksamhet och dålig kunskapsförmedling var andra faktorer som togs upp. </p> / <p>Ecosystem based management is a management approach that seeks to integrate ecological, social and economic goals. The Norwegian management plan for the Barents Sea is one of the most advanced attempts to ecosystem based management. There is, however, still a long way to go to achieve the goals that have been set. This is especially true for the environmental objective of biodiversity. Even though fishing activity has been pointed out as one of the main reasons for biodiversity loss, little attention has been drawn to this fact. This paper therefore tries to give the answer to the questions of how people working within the management perceive the plan; the core values of it, its flaws, and why they beleave that the negative consequenses of fisheries have been out of focus.</p><p> </p><p>The holistic viewpoint and the cooperation between the various sectors were the most emphazised values of the management plan. Organizational problems, conservatism, and power struggles were regarded as the main problems in trying to reach these goals. Lack of communication between  implementing bodies and investigating bodies was one example of this. Conservatism and power struggles were described as unwillingnes among individuals to adopt to the new intersectoral structures, and a wish to safeguard ones own power. The reason why the negative consequenses of fisheries have been out of focus, was also blamed on structural problems to a large extent. Other contributing factors were also the strong cultural role fisheries play in the norweigan society, the political focus on petroleum activity, and an insufficient spread of knowledge.</p>

Ekosystembaserad förvaltning bygger på en helhetlig syn på ekosystemen och dess förhållande till mänsklig aktivitet. Förvaltningsplanen för Barents hav utanför Norge är ett de längst framskridna försöken till implementering av denna förvaltningsmodell. Lång väg återstår dock för att uppnå de målsättningar som satts och särskilt gäller detta miljömålet för biologisk mångfald. Trots att fiskeri utpekats som den största påverkningsfaktorn på biologisk mångfald har det varit lite fokus på fiskeriernas negativa konsekvenser i arbetet med förvaltningsplanen. Den här uppsatsen försöker ge en bild av hur personer som jobbar inom förvaltningen ser på värdet med förvaltningsplanen, hur de uppfattar dess brister, och just varför de tror att fiskeriet negativa konsekvenser fått liten uppmärksamhet. Helhetlighet och tvärsektoriellt samarbete kunde konkluderas som de främsta värdena med förvaltningsplanen. Organisationsproblem, konservatism och maktkamper ansågs dock skapa problem för implementering och samarbete över sektorerna, bland annat genom genom dålig kommunikation mellan utredningsgrupper och den implementerande organisationen. Konservatism och maktkamp uttrycktes i form av en ovillighet från andra att samarbeta över sektorerna, att bryta det sektoriella tankesättet, och en vilja att värna om sin maktsfär.  Strukturella problem lyftes även fram som en av de bakomliggande anledninganar till att fiskeriernas negativa effekter inte fått mer fokus. Starkt kulturellt fäste, fokus på petroleumsverksamhet och dålig kunskapsförmedling var andra faktorer som togs upp. / Ecosystem based management is a management approach that seeks to integrate ecological, social and economic goals. The Norwegian management plan for the Barents Sea is one of the most advanced attempts to ecosystem based management. There is, however, still a long way to go to achieve the goals that have been set. This is especially true for the environmental objective of biodiversity. Even though fishing activity has been pointed out as one of the main reasons for biodiversity loss, little attention has been drawn to this fact. This paper therefore tries to give the answer to the questions of how people working within the management perceive the plan; the core values of it, its flaws, and why they beleave that the negative consequenses of fisheries have been out of focus.   The holistic viewpoint and the cooperation between the various sectors were the most emphazised values of the management plan. Organizational problems, conservatism, and power struggles were regarded as the main problems in trying to reach these goals. Lack of communication between  implementing bodies and investigating bodies was one example of this. Conservatism and power struggles were described as unwillingnes among individuals to adopt to the new intersectoral structures, and a wish to safeguard ones own power. The reason why the negative consequenses of fisheries have been out of focus, was also blamed on structural problems to a large extent. Other contributing factors were also the strong cultural role fisheries play in the norweigan society, the political focus on petroleum activity, and an insufficient spread of knowledge.