Thesis (MSc)--Stellenbosch University, 2015. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: In the context of rapidly expanding cities, it is imperative that urban planning in South Africa has sufficient guidance regarding stormwater and river corridor management, in order to provide solutions that address issues of flood risk and the environmental health of river systems. Attenuation of stormwater runoff, the focus of this study, is one of the most important structural mechanisms used for the mitigation of many of the negative impacts caused by uncontrolled urban runoff. Typically, it involves the use of attenuation ponds or wetlands, which temporarily store runoff during a storm and release flow downstream at a reduced rate so as to mimic natural flow patterns. The focus of urban stormwater management and flood control has historically been on the protection of human life and property. However, in recent decades, through growing environmental awareness and the advancement of the concept of sustainable development, urban stormwater management has become a growing field of research worldwide, with a broader focus which considers not only flood control, but also water quality, aquatic biodiversity and the amenity value of urban drainage systems. Flood attenuation controls are becoming more widely used within South African urban areas, primarily due to policies or legislation brought into effect by local authorities. However, there is often little understanding regarding the positive and perhaps negative effects that these attenuation controls are having on receiving watercourses downstream. Three case studies were assessed by means of stormwater modelling simulations to evaluate various flood attenuation practices which are currently in use in South Africa. Two of the study areas, the Mosselbank River Catchment and the Bayside Canal Catchment, were selected in areas of Cape Town where future development has been proposed by spatial planners. The third study area, the Upper Kuils River Catchment, was evaluated in terms of the performance of existing attenuation facilities in an area which is already almost completely developed. The study found that attenuation facilities constructed with a single culvert-type outlet structure, designed to reduce flows during large storm events, do not mitigate the impact of post-development runoff occurring during lower recurrence interval storm events. Attenuation facilities with multi-stage outlet structures were found to be much more effective at mimicking pre-development flow during a range of storm events. It was also found that because attenuation does not reduce post-development runoff volumes to pre-development levels, but merely reduces peak flow rates, the cumulative runoff from multiple attenuation controls across a large (>30 km2) urban catchment resulted in higher runoff peaks in downstream watercourses. The study concluded that more widespread use of stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Sustainable Drainage System (SuDS) controls allows a greater portion of runoff to infiltrate, resulting in less runoff volume and therefore reduced peak flows downstream, especially during low recurrence interval storm events. In addition, the study recommended the use of detailed catchment-wide stormwater modelling to understand specific catchment dynamics holistically, thus increasing the potential for designing effective attenuation controls in urban stormwater systems. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In die konteks van die vinnige tempo van stedelike uitbreiding, is dit noodsaaklik dat stedelike beplanning in Suid-Afrika plaasvind met in aggenome van voldoende riglyne vir die bestuur van stormwater en rivierkorridors, ten einde oplossings te vind vir die kwessies van vloedrisiko en die omgewingsgesondheid van rivierstelsels. Vloedvertraging, wat die fokus van hierdie studie is, is een van die belangrikste strukturele meganismes wat gebruik word vir die verligting van talle negatiewe impakte wat veroorsaak word deur onbeheerde stormwaterafloop in stedelike gebiede. Tipies behels dit die gebruik van vloedvertragingsdamme of vleilande, wat afloop vertraag tydens 'n storm en dus vloei stroom-af teen 'n verlaagde tempo uitlaat met die doel om natuurlike vloeipatrone na te boots. Die fokus van stedelike stormwaterbestuur en vloedbeheer was in die verlede hoofsaaklik op die beskerming van lewe en eiendom gefokus, maar het egter die afgelope dekades verskuif na water gehalte, die biodiversiteit van waterekosisteme en die geriefswaarde van stedelike dreineringstelsels. Hierdie verskuiwing van fokus is weens die groeiende omgewingsbewustheid en die bevordering van die konsep van volhoubare ontwikkeling wat wêreldwyd 'n groter navorsingsgebied geraak het. Vloedvertraging beheermeganismes word al hoe meer algemeen gebruik in Suid-Afrikaanse stedelike gebiede, hoofsaaklik as gevolg van die beleide of wetgewing wat deur plaaslike owerhede in werking gestel is. Daar is egter dikwels min begrip vir die positiewe en moontlike negatiewe gevolge wat hierdie vertragingsmeganismes op stroom-af sisteme het. Drie gevallestudies is geëvalueer deur middel van numeriese modelstudies wat verskeie benaderings van vloed beheer, wat tans in Suid-Afrika gebruik is, in ag neem. Twee van die studie areas, naamlik die Mosselbank en die Bayside-kanaal opvanggebiede in die Kaapse metropool, is gekies in areas waar toekomstige ontwikkeling in die vooruitsig gestel is deur stadsbeplanners. Die derde studie area, die opvangsgebied van die bolope van die Kuilsrivier, is in terme van die prestasie van bestaande stormwater infrastruktuur in 'n gebied wat reeds byna heeltemal ontwikkel is, geëvalueer. Die studie het bevind dat vloedvertragingsfasiliteite met 'n enkele duiker uitlaatstruktuur, wat ontwerp is met die doel om die vloeispitse tydens groot storms te demp, nie die impak van die na-ontwikkeling afloop, wat gedurende storms met laer herhalingsinterval voorkom, verminder nie. In terme van vloedvertragingsfasiliteite met 'n veelvuldige uitlaatstruktuur, is dit bevind dat voorontwikkelingsafloop tydens 'n reeks van groot en kleiner storms veel meer effektief nageboots word. Daar is egter ook bevind dat die demping van die vloedspitse nie die naontwikkeling afloopvolumes verminder tot voorontwikkelingsvlakke nie, maar slegs tot die vermindering van maksimum snelhede lei. Die gevolg is dat die totale afloop van ‘n kombinasie van ‘n aantal vertragingsdamme oor 'n groot (> 30 km2) stedelike opvanggebied ‘n hoër spitsvloei in die stroom-af riviere tot gevolg het. Die studie het bevind dat die wydverspreide gebruik van bestebestuurspraktyke (BMPs) en volhoubare stedelike dreineringstelsels (SuDS) tot die infiltrasie van ‘n groter gedeelte van die afloop lei, wat laer afloopvolume en dus verminderde spitsvloei stroomaf tot gevolg het, veral gedurende storms met ‘n lae herhalingsinterval. Daarbenewens word die aanwending van gedetailleerde modellering van stormwatersisteme binne die groter opvangsgebied aanbeveel ten einde ‘n meer holistiese begrip van spesifieke aspekte van die opvangegebied dinamika, om sodoende die potensiaal vir die ontwerp van effektiewe vloedvertragingskontroles in stedelike stormwaterstelsels te verbeter.

>Magister Scientiae - MSc / The Kars has a well-defined channel along the 62 km stretch from its sources in the Bredasdorp Mountains. After entering the Agulhas plain which has a very low gradient, this river changes into a triangular shaped wetland. This wetland is 7 km in length with no defined channel running through it. The wetland then discharges into another 7 km long channel that joins the Heuningnes River with its mouth at the Indian Ocean. The presence of the wetland causes frequent flooding which affects cultivated lands and a major highway linking towns on the coastal Cape Agulhas area with the rest of the country. Before this study, there was no monitoring of flows along the Kars River including water levels within the wetland. Consequently, the conditions leading to flooding of the wetlands were unknown. This study is aimed at understanding how the combination of local rainfall, Kars River inflow into the wetland, soil characteristics, and the morphology of the wetland influence flooding/inundation. The study monitored river inflows into and outflows from the wetland. A soil survey was conducted within the wetland using the augering method and an infiltrometer to determine soil type and infiltration rates. This was done to assess the hydrological characteristics of the wetland. Using the collected climate data and river flow data, a conceptual model was developed for predicting downstream outflows and possible flood events on a daily timescale. The results indicated that the Kars wetland comprises soil with high silt and clay content, and low infiltration capacity. The wetland causes flood attenuation and diffuse surface flows. Low infiltration rates result in ponding of local rainfall which can contribute to flooding.

Magister Scientiae (Integrated Water Resource Management) / River catchments in agricultural areas are strongly influenced by runoff from cultivated or grazed fields, and nutrient loading of these fields can result in large quantities of nitrates and phosphates being transported to rivers in surface runoff. In intensively farmed areas, nutrient loading is often so high that large quantities of nitrates and phosphates are transported to streams in surface runoff. Within these areas, strips of natural riparian vegetation and wetlands are critical in providing nutrient uptake functions that can reduce the load entering streams. A wetland can be a source, sink or transformer of nutrients, where fine sediments such as silt and clay have the ability to store and trap considerable amounts of phosphorus through adsorption and precipitation processes. Therefore, the determination of phosphorus adsorbed to fine sediment is important in understanding the role and value of wetlands in agricultural landscapes, and is the main focus of this study. The aim of the study is to evaluate an indicator-based approach, WET-EcoServices, to assess wetland sediment and phosphate trapping, through comparison with field survey data. The study focuses on spatial analysis and field survey of three Hydrogeomorphological (HGM) units classified for the Wiesdrift wetland on the Nuwejaars River, Cape Agulhas. The three HGM units are classified as: a floodplain wetland at the inlet of the system, a channelled valley-bottom wetland towards the middle part of the system and a floodplain wetland towards the outlet of the system. In-field observations were recorded for hydrogeomorphic and vegetation characteristics for each HGM Unit. AstroTurf mat sediment samples, grabbed channel bed and floodplain sediment samples were analysed for particle size and orthophosphate concentrations, while suspended sediment masses were recorded from three pairs of time-integrated sediment samplers located near the inlet, near the middle, and near the outlet of the wetland. Statistical analysis showed that orthophosphate concentrations are associated with fine sediment. Thus, the orthophosphate concentrations follow the distribution of silt on the Wiesdrift wetland. The dominant vegetation along transect 2, at which the highest concentrations of orthophosphate was found, is occupied by Typha capensis and Cyperus textilis. The percentage of fine sediment (silt) ranged between 0-37%, where the remaining percentage was sand. There was also a significant positive correlation between orthophosphate concentration and silt (Spearman’s rank-order correlation: rs = 0.692, N = 70, P < .001). The largest total sediment amount was found at Outlet 1 and Outlet 2 in the HGM unit 3 of the Wiesdrift wetland, with a value of 0.653 g. Overall, orthophosphate concentrations ranged between 0 mg/kg and 31320 mg/kg within the Wiesdrift wetland. WET-EcoServices determines an average score for phosphate trapping from on-site indicators such as hydrological zones, vegetation structure and soil texture/permeability. The dispersal of fine sediment and associated adsorbed phosphate is more complex than can be determined by a tool like WET-EcoServices because the tool captures the long-term mean conditions of a wetland system that determines the overall uptake of phosphates over extended time periods, thus future wetland assessments is recommended to take place over a longer period than this study. However, the field results of orthophosphate distribution are generally consistent with the findings from WET-EcoServices, further motivating for the use of the tool in wetland management applications.

Extreme flooding and excess nutrient pollution have been detrimental to river health under increased environmental stress from human activities (e.g., agriculture, urbanization). Riverine flooding can be detrimental to human life and infrastructure yet provides important habitat and ecosystem services. Traditional flood control approaches (e.g., levees, dams) negatively impact habitat and ecosystem services, and cause flooding elsewhere along the river. Prior studies have shown that stream restoration can enhance flood attenuation, and increased exchange of water between the channel and floodplain can improve water quality. However, the effects of floodplain restoration during small and sub annual recurrence interval storms have not been thoroughly studied, nor have cumulative impacts of floodplain restoration on water quality at watershed scales. We used HEC-RAS to perform 1D unsteady simulations on a 2nd-order generic stream from the Chesapeake Bay Watershed to study flood attenuation under small and sub-annual recurrence interval storms (i.e., 2-year, 1-year, 0.5-year, and monthly). In HEC-RAS we varied percent of channel restored, location of restoration, bank height of restoration, floodplain width, and floodplain Manning's n. Overall, stream restoration reduced peak flow (up to 37%) and decreased time to peak (up to 93%). We found the timing of tributary inflows could obscure the attenuation achieved, and even reverse the trends with certain parameters in the sensitivity analysis. The greatest exchange with the floodplains (greater volume and exchange under more recurrence interval storms) was observed from Stage 0 restoration, which reduces bank height more than other approaches. We also conducted a quantitative literature synthesis of nitrate removal rates from stream restoration projects. We focused on how removal rates varied with properties relevant at watershed scales, such as effects of stream order. The resulting database will aid in determining which stream restoration parameters better reduce nutrient loads and in simulating the effects of stream restoration on water quality at watershed scales. Floodplain restoration practices, and particularly Stage 0 approaches, enhance flood attenuation which can help to counteract urban hydrologic effects. / Master of Science / Extreme flooding and excess nutrient pollution have been detrimental to river health under increased environmental stress from human activities (e.g., agriculture, urbanization). Riverine flooding can be detrimental to human life and infrastructure yet provides important habitat and ecosystem services. Traditional flood control approaches (e.g., levees, dams) negatively impact habitat and ecosystem services, and cause flooding elsewhere along the river. Prior studies have shown that stream restoration can enhance flood attenuation and aid in removal of excess nutrients. Previous studies have shown that stream restoration helps to transport nutrients to highly reactive soils and increases time for reactions. However, the effects of floodplain restoration during small and sub annual recurrence interval storms have not been thoroughly studied, nor have cumulative impacts of floodplain restoration on water quality at watershed scales. To fill these knowledge gaps, increased understanding of stream restoration design parameters and watershed level characteristics (e.g., tributary inflows, nutrient loads, etc.) is necessary. We used HEC-RAS to study flood attenuation via stream restoration under small and sub-annual recurrence interval storms on a generic stream from the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. In HEC-RAS we varied percent of channel restored, location of restoration, bank height of restoration, floodplain width, and floodplain Manning's n (surface roughness). Overall, stream restoration did reduce peak flow and decrease time to peak, which means that restoration can diminish negative flooding effects. The greatest exchange with the floodplains was observed under Stage 0 restoration, which reduces bank height more than other approaches. We also conducted a quantitative literature synthesis to collect nitrate removal rates from stream restoration projects. We focused on how removal rates varied with properties relevant at watershed scales, such as effects of stream order. The resulting database will aid in determining which stream restoration parameters better reduce nutrient loads and in simulating the effects of stream restoration on water quality at watershed scales. These efforts will help to inform practitioners how to construct stream restoration projects that are more efficient for flood control and nutrient reduction. Floodplain restoration practices, particularly Stage 0 approaches, enhance flood attenuation and exchange which can help to counteract urban hydrologic effects.

Human land use practices such as urbanization and agriculture contribute excess nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and runoff volumes to rivers that degrade aquatic ecosystems and cause a loss of river functions such as nutrient processing and flood attenuation. Floodplain restoration increases floodplain exchange and is commonly implemented to improve water quality and reduce flood impacts at watershed scales. However, the effect of multiple restoration projects at the watershed scale is not well studied. We addressed this knowledge gap by two studies. The first study evaluated the impact of cumulative and spatially varying Stage-0 and bankfull floodplain restoration on nitrate removal in a generic 4th-order Virginia Piedmont watershed for small and sub-annual storm sizes (i.e. 2-year, 1-year, half-year, and monthly recurrence intervals). We used HEC-RAS hydraulics results from a prior study together with a nitrate removal model coded in R. Results indicated that watershed nitrate removal varied depending on the location of restoration in the watershed and where removal was evaluated. The greatest reductions in nitrate loads were observed in the same part of the river network where restoration occurred, with diminished impacts downstream. Removal also increased with increasing stream order/river size. However, removal was generally of small magnitude, with up to 1% or 19% of the watershed load removed for median or 90th-percentile removal rates, respectively. We estimated removal for our restoration scenarios under the Chesapeake Bay Program Protocols and found the removal rate to also be a critical factor in determining the efficiency of restoration project. Other controlling factors for nitrate removal were the amount of restoration and storm size. The second study entailed modeling cumulative restoration in a case study watershed to assess the impacts on nutrient removal and flood attenuation. We built a 1D HEC-RAS model of the 4th-order Gwynns Falls watershed near Baltimore MD using georeferenced HEC-RAS model geometries from the Maryland Department of the Environment and simulated unsteady stormflow hydraulics due to cumulative Stage-0 floodplain restoration for small and sub-annual storms. Restoration actually increased peak flow on the main channel (up to 0.9%) due to slowing of the flood wave on the main channel which was then better synchronized with tributary inflows. Restoration increased nitrate removal but at low levels (up to 0.12% or 2.6% removal for a median and 90th-percentile removal rate respectively) due to the small footprint of restoration in the watershed (up to 21.4% of the main channel was restored). These small and sometimes adverse outcomes occurred in response to what would be expensive restoration. Therefore, we argue for large-scale solutions to address watershed-scale water quality and flooding issues yet acknowledge re-evaluation of restoration goals against other societal priorities may be necessary. Overall, our results highlight the potential value and limitations of floodplain restoration in reducing flooding and nitrate exports at the channel network scale and provide practical insight for application of floodplain modeling at the watershed scale. / Master of Science / Human land use practices such as building cities and farms adds nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and increase storm flows in rivers downstream. While nutrients and flows are needed for humans and wildlife, too much of either can harm aquatic organisms and endanger people and property. Floodplain restoration is a common river engineering technique that increases exchange between the river channel and low-lying areas next to rivers known as floodplains. Floodplains are natural features, but people have reduced river flows between channels and floodplains in many ways. For example, by allowing sediments to build up in floodplains or building levees that separate channels from adjacent floodplains. Increasing floodplain exchange by floodplain restoration is commonly implemented to improve water quality and reduce the impact of flooding in watersheds, which are large areas that drain to a single river. However, while the goals of restoration are often at watershed scales, the effect of multiple restoration projects at that watershed scale is not well studied. We addressed this knowledge gap by two studies. The first study evaluated the impact of multiple restoration projects and project locations in a generic (average/typical) watershed on nitrate removal. We used a nitrate removal model and the results from a prior study that modeled the stormflow behavior resulting from floodplain restoration. Results indicated that watershed nitrate removal varied depended on the location of restoration in the watershed and where removal was evaluated. The most nitrate was removed where restoration occurred, with less removal downstream in the watershed. Removal also increased with increasing river size. However, removal was generally small with up to 1% or 19% of the watershed load removed for a smaller and larger nitrate removal rate, respectively. Other factors that changed the amount of nitrate removed were the amount of restoration, nitrate removal rate in the floodplains, and storm size. The second study entailed modeling cumulative restoration in a case study watershed to assess the impacts on nitrate removal and reducing flooding. We modeled stormflow for multiple hypothetical restoration projects in the Gwynns Falls watershed and found that restoration can actually increase peak flow when placed in certain locations. Restoration increased removal but at low levels (up to 0.12% or 2.6% for a smaller and larger removal rate) due to the small amount of restoration simulated. These small and sometimes adverse outcomes occurred in response to what would be expensive restoration projects to construct. Therefore, we argue for large-scale solutions to address watershed-scale water quality and flooding issues yet acknowledge that re-evaluation of restoration goals against other societal priorities may be necessary. Overall, our results highlight the potential value and limitations of using floodplain restoration to reduce flooding and nutrient exports and provide practical insight for using our modeling techniques in managing watershed flows and pollution.

Severe flooding and excess nutrient pollution, exacerbated by heightened anthropogenic pressures (e.g., climate change, urbanization, land use change, unsustainable agricultural practices), have been detrimental to riverine systems and their estuaries. The degradation of riverine systems can negatively impact human and environmental health, as well as local, regional, and even global economies. Floods provide beneficial ecosystem services (e.g., processing pollutants, transferring nutrients and sediment, supporting biodiversity), but they can also damage infrastructure and result in the loss of human life. Meanwhile, eutrophication can cause anoxic dead zones, harming aquatic ecosystems and public health. To address the issues facing riverine systems, focus has shifted to watershed-scale management plans. However, it can prove challenging to quantify the cumulative impacts of multiple stream restoration projects within a single watershed on flooding and nutrient removal. Previous studies have quantified the effects of stream restoration on flood attenuation. However, our first study fills a substantial knowledge gap by evaluating the impacts of different floodplain restoration practices, varied by location and length, on flood attenuation and floodplain inundation dynamics at the watershed scale during more frequent storm recurrence intervals (i.e., 2-year, 1-year, 0.5-year, and monthly). We created a 1D HEC-RAS model to simulate the effects of Stage 0 restoration within a 4th-order generic watershed based on the Chesapeake Bay watershed. By varying the percent river length restored and location, we found that Stage 0 restoration, especially in 2nd-order rivers, can be particularly effective at enhancing flood attenuation and floodplain inundation locally and farther downstream. We addressed the water quality component by using a random forest machine learning approach coupled with artificial neural networks to find trends and predict nitrate removal rates associated with spatial, temporal, hydrologic, and restoration features. Our results showed that hydrologic conditions were the most important variable for predicting actual nitrate removal rates. Overall, both studies demonstrate the importance of hydrologic connectivity for flood attenuation, channel-floodplain exchange, and nutrient processing. / Maryland Department of Natural Resources; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Chesapeake Bay Program Office; Chesapeake Bay Trust / Master of Science / Severe flooding and nutrient pollution from sources such as urban and agricultural runoff have been detrimental to the health of rivers. The degradation of rivers can negatively impact human and environmental health, as well as local, regional, and even global economies. Floods can be both helpful, by providing water quality benefits and supporting wildlife, and harmful, causing damage and even loss of life. Excess nutrients, such as nitrogen, can create underwater zones void of life, with serious consequences for aquatic life and public health. To address the flooding and water quality issues facing rivers, focus has shifted to landscapelevel river network management plans. However, it can prove challenging to understand the impacts of multiple stream restoration projects within a larger river network on flooding and nutrient removal. We address the flooding component by using a model to simulate the effects of different floodplain restoration techniques on a medium-sized watershed that is generally based on streams that flow into the Chesapeake Bay. Our model simulated small, relatively frequent storm events that, on average, occur every two years to once a month. By varying restoration length and location, we found that restoration practices with lower streambanks can be particularly effective at slowing down floods, reducing their overall severity by allowing more water to access the floodplains. This was especially true when restoration occurred in smaller streams, and the effects were seen both locally and farther downstream. We address the water quality component by using a different model to find patterns and predict nutrient removal rates associated with different landscape, seasonal, storm event, and restoration features. Our results showed that the most important variable for predicting nutrient removal rates was whether a stream was experiencing normal flow or stormflow conditions. Overall, both studies demonstrate the importance of restoring rivers in a manner that encourages water to flow from the channel into the floodplains during smaller storm events, because this will reduce the severity of downstream flooding while simultaneously improving water quality.