Adherens junctions are cadherin-dependent structures that mediate intercellular signaling and structural integrity of the endothelial barrier. Formins are a highly conserved family of cytoskeletal remodeling proteins whose activity has been implicated in regulating adherens junction formation in other cell-types. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that formin activity is essential for adherens junction assembly in endothelial cells. A small-molecule formin inhibitor (smiFH2) was used to determine the effect of formin inhibition on junction formation using an in vitro vascular permeability assay. We determined that smiFH2 treatment caused a dose-dependent inhibition of junction formation. We used siRNAs to knockdown expression of the seven formins shown to be expressed in TIME cells and determined that individual knockdown of FHOD1, FHOD3 and Dia1 significantly increased the permeability of the endothelial monolayer. Interestingly, FMNL2 knockdown actually potentiated barrier function. Knockdown of the remaining formins had little or no effect on junction formation. Knockdown of FHOD3 had the greatest inhibitory effect on junction assembly; VE-cadherin protein levels were decreased in FHOD3-depleted cells. The FHOD3 knockdown cells were also elongated in comparison to controls and formed thin linear adherens junctions and few focal adherens junctions. In contrast, the morphology of FMNL2-depleted cells did not appear obviously different from controls. In conclusion, our results suggest that multiple formins play diverse roles in adherens junction formation and maintenance in endothelial cells.

Les formines de la famille des DRF sont des puissants nucleateurs d'actine. Précédemment, nous avons montré que DRF1 participe à la capture des microtubules (MTs) au niveau du cortex cellulaire, en aval du récepteur ErbB2. Ceci impliquait le recrutement d'APC et ACF7. Dans cette étude, nous avons examiné la contribution de DRF1, DRF2 et DRF3 à la capture des MT corticaux et à la migration cellulaire ErbB2- dépendante. La déplétion individuelle de DRF1/2 ou 3 à l'aide de siRNA perturbe fortement la migration chimiotactique ErbB2-dépendante. Les DRF sont toutes trois requises pour la capture des MT au niveau du cortex cellulaire. Des mutants de DRF1 déficients pour leur association avec l'actine sont toujours actifs pour la capture des MT. Nous avons aussi pu montrer qu'une construction limitée au domaine FH2 des DRF était parfaitement fonctionnelle. Nous avons alors procéder à une recherche systématique des protéines se liant au domaine FH2, par purification d'affinité et spectrométrie de masse. Nous avons observé que les domaines FH2 de DRF1, DRF2 et DRF3 se lient à des groupes de partenaires distincts. Ainsi, seul le domaine FH2 de DRF1 lie la protéine Rab6-Interacting Protein 2 (RB6IP2). De plus, DRF1 contrôle le recrutement de RB6IP2 au cortex cellulaire et la déplétion concomitante de RB6IP2 et d'IQGAP1 perturbe fortement la capture des MT. Ces résultats démontrent l'implication de l'interaction entre DRF1 et RB6IP2 dans la capture des MT dans les cellules en migration. / Diaphanous-related formins (DRF) nucleate single linear filaments, binding to and protecting from capping their growing barbed ends. We have previously found that DRF1 participated to the tethering of microtubules (MTs) to the cell cortex, downstream of the ErbB2 receptor tyrosine kinase. This involved the recruitment of APC and ACF7. We have now further investigated the contribution of DRF1, and of the closely related DRF2 and DRF3, to the capture of cortical MTs and ErbB2-dependent breast carcinoma cell migration.Using siRNA to knock down individual DRFs, we found that depletion of DRF1/2 or3 strongly disturbed ErbB2-dependent chemotaxis. All three DRFs were required for the formation of cortical MTs, in a non-redundant manner. DRF1 mutant proteins defective for actin binding were still active for MT capture. We also found that, upon truncation of the Formin Homology (FH) 1 domain, the FH2 domain remained fully functional. In a systematic search for proteins binding to the FH2 domains via affinity purification and mass spectrometry analysis, we observed that the FH2 domains of DRF1, DRF2 and DRF3 engaged with distinct sets of proteins. For instance, only FH2 domain of DRF1 pulled down Rab6-Interacting Protein 2 (RB6IP2). Interestingly, DRF1 controlled the cortical localization of RB6IP2 and concomitant depletion of RB6IP2 and IQGAP1 strongly disturbed capture of cortical MTs, showing the involvement of the DRF1/IQGAP1/RB6IP2 interaction in MT tethering at the cell leading edge.

The actin and microtubule cytoskeleton plays a critical role in the establishment of cell polarity. Cell processes like mitosis and migration rely on the reorganization of the cytoskeleton to properly function. One driver of cell polarity is the formin, Inverted Formin-1 (INF1). INF1 is able to induce F-actin formation, activate the Serum Response Factor (SRF) pathway, stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi body. Regulation of INF1 is unique, since it does not possess conserved formin regulatory domains. However, INF1 does possess many potential phosphorylation sites. In this study, we demonstrate that INF1’s ability to induce F-actin stress fibers and activate SRF is inhibited by Microtubule-Affinity Regulating Kinase 2 (MARK2). Inhibition of INF1’s actin polymerization activity by MARK2 likely occurs near INF1’s C-terminus. However, MARK2 was unable to inhibit INF1’s ability to stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi. Furthermore, we show that INF1 overexpression is associated with primary cilium absence and in some cases, the presence of long cilia, suggesting that INF1 plays a role in primary cilium formation.

The actin and microtubule cytoskeleton plays a critical role in the establishment of cell polarity. Cell processes like mitosis and migration rely on the reorganization of the cytoskeleton to properly function. One driver of cell polarity is the formin, Inverted Formin-1 (INF1). INF1 is able to induce F-actin formation, activate the Serum Response Factor (SRF) pathway, stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi body. Regulation of INF1 is unique, since it does not possess conserved formin regulatory domains. However, INF1 does possess many potential phosphorylation sites. In this study, we demonstrate that INF1’s ability to induce F-actin stress fibers and activate SRF is inhibited by Microtubule-Affinity Regulating Kinase 2 (MARK2). Inhibition of INF1’s actin polymerization activity by MARK2 likely occurs near INF1’s C-terminus. However, MARK2 was unable to inhibit INF1’s ability to stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi. Furthermore, we show that INF1 overexpression is associated with primary cilium absence and in some cases, the presence of long cilia, suggesting that INF1 plays a role in primary cilium formation.

The actin and microtubule cytoskeleton plays a critical role in the establishment of cell polarity. Cell processes like mitosis and migration rely on the reorganization of the cytoskeleton to properly function. One driver of cell polarity is the formin, Inverted Formin-1 (INF1). INF1 is able to induce F-actin formation, activate the Serum Response Factor (SRF) pathway, stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi body. Regulation of INF1 is unique, since it does not possess conserved formin regulatory domains. However, INF1 does possess many potential phosphorylation sites. In this study, we demonstrate that INF1’s ability to induce F-actin stress fibers and activate SRF is inhibited by Microtubule-Affinity Regulating Kinase 2 (MARK2). Inhibition of INF1’s actin polymerization activity by MARK2 likely occurs near INF1’s C-terminus. However, MARK2 was unable to inhibit INF1’s ability to stabilize microtubules, associate with microtubules, and disperse the Golgi. Furthermore, we show that INF1 overexpression is associated with primary cilium absence and in some cases, the presence of long cilia, suggesting that INF1 plays a role in primary cilium formation.

Chez la levure Saccharomyces cerevisiae, la croissance est orientée et nécessite l’apport de membranes et d’enzymes pour la synthèse de la paroi cellulaire. La régulation du transport des vésicules permettant cet apport est assuré par les GTPases de la famille Ypt/Rab. Sec4p, une Ypt/Rab GTPase, est impliquée dans l’exocytose en assurant la spécificité de l’ancrage des vésicules post-golgiennes envoyées aux sites de croissance. La régulation de son activité GTPase est essentielle pour sa fonction.Nous nous intéressons aux protéines Gyp5p et Gyl1p, deux membres de la famille des protéines activatrices des GTPases Ypt/Rab chez S. cerevisiae. Le laboratoire a montré l’implication du complexe Gyp5p-Gyl1p dans l’exocytose polarisée vraisemblablement par la régulation de Sec4p. Notre étude a montré une interaction directe in vitro de ces deux protéines, ainsi qu’une interdépendance pour une bonne localisation du complexe aux sites de croissance polarisée, c'est-à-dire au sommet du bourgeon durant la croissance apicale et au cou du bourgeon durant la cytocinèse. Cette localisation dépend de deux formines, d’éléments du polarisome et des câbles d’actine. De plus, nous avons montré par des expériences d’immunofluorescence et de microscopie électronique en collaboration avec J.-M. Verbavatz (iBiTec-S, CEA), que ces protéines sont transportées sur des vésicules de sécrétion jusqu’aux sites de croissance polarisée.Notre étude de l’interaction du complexe Gyp5p-Gyl1p avec Rvs167p, une protéine à domaine BAR (Bin1-Amphiphysin-Rvs167p) a montré que Gyp5p et Gyl1p sont nécessaires pour la bonne localisation de Rvs167p au sommet du petit bourgeon et que ces complexes se forment principalement dans des fractions enrichies en membrane plasmique. Pour mieux caractériser ces interactions, nous avons réalisé une mutation de la proline 473 dans le domaine SH3 de Rvs167p et des délétions des séquences riches en proline de Gyp5p et Gyl1p. Ces mutations entraînent un défaut d’interaction de Rvs167p avec Gyp5p et Gyl1p et la perte de la localisation de Rvs167p au sommet du petit bourgeon. Afin de comprendre la fonction de ces interactions, nous avons réalisé des expériences de microscopie électronique et des tests de sécrétion de l’endo-β-1,3-glucanase, Bgl2p dans une souche Δrvs167. Nous avons mis en évidence une accumulation de vésicules de sécrétion au niveau du petit bourgeon et un défaut de sécrétion de Bgl2p à 13°C dans cette souche. De plus, nous avons également observé une accumulation de vésicules de sécrétion dans une souche exprimant Rvs167p mutée pour la proline 473 et un défaut de sécrétion de Bgl2p dans une souche exprimant Gyp5p et Gyl1p dépourvues de leurs séquences riches en proline. Ces résultats montrent que Rvs167p joue un rôle dans l’exocytose polarisée au stade du petit bourgeon et que cette fonction dépend de son recrutement par Gyp5p et Gyl1p au sommet du petit bourgeon. / In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, growth is oriented and requires the contribution of membranes and enzymes for the synthesis of the cell wall. Regulation of vesicles transport allowing this contribution is provided by the Ypt/Rab GTPases family. Sec4p, a Ypt/Rab GTPase, is involved in exocytosis by controlling the tethering of post-Golgi vesicles at sites of growth. Regulation of Sec4p GTPase activity by is essential for its function.We studied the proteins Gyp5p and Gyl1p, two members of the Ypt/Rab GTPases activiting proteins (RabGAP) family in S. cerevisiae. Gyp5p and Gyl1p interact with Sec4p and are involved in the control of exocytosis at the small-bud stage. Our study showed that Gyp5p and Gyl1p interact directly in vitro and are interdependent for their correct localization to the sites of polarized growth, e.g. the bud tip during apical growth and the bud neck during cytokinesis. We showed that the localization of Gyp5p and Gyl1p to the sites of polarized growth depends on the formins Bni1 and Bnr1, but also on polarisome components and actin cables. Moreover, we showed by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy (in collaboration with J.-M. Verbavatz), that Gyp5p and Gyl1p are transported onto secretory vesicles to access the sites of polarized growth.We studied the interaction of Gyp5p and Gyl1p with Rvs167p, a BAR domain (Bin1-Amphiphysin-Rvs167p) protein and showed that Gyp5p and Gyl1p are necessary for the recruitment of Rvs167p to the small-bud tip. Both the mutation of the proline 473 in the SH3 domain of Rvs167p and the deletion of the proline-rich regions of Gyp5p and Gyl1p disrupt the interaction of Rvs167p with Gyp5p and Gyl1p and impair the localization of Rvs167p to the tips of small buds. Electron microscopy experiments unraveled an accumulation of secretory vesicles in small buds of rvs167Δcells and β-1,3-endoglucanase Bgl2p secretion assays showed Bgl2p secretion defects in cultures enriched in small buds at 13°C. In addition, an accumulation of secretory vesicles was observed in Rvs167pP473L strain, and Bgl2p secretion defect were found in strains expressing Gyp5p and Gyl1p deleted of their proline-rich sequences. These results show that Rvs167p plays a role in polarized exocytosis at the small bud stage and that its function in exocytosis depends on its recruitment to the tip of small buds by the RabGAP proteins Gyp5p and Gyl1p.

No description available.