Pile-supported ports allow seawater to run below the deck, and thus may suffer structural damages during extreme coastal events such as hurricanes. These structural damages, in turn, may result to port closures that can cause significant economic losses. Risk analysis can predict the post-hazard functionality of ports though the structural damage assessment of these structures prior to coastal events. However, assumptions on the selected demand estimates may affect the estimated probability of structural damage. This research aims to shed light on the sensitivity of the wave model selection for the risk assessment of pile-supported ports when subjected to storm surge and waves. The examined structural damage is the uplift of the deck, and the risk assessment is conducted through the development of fragility curves for a typical deck-pile connection, for which fragility curves are developed for different wave models. Uncertainties are also considered in parameters affecting the demand and capacity of the examined deck-pile connection and are propagated through the Monte Carlo simulation using the Latin Hypercube Sampling. The results indicate changes to the uplift probability as a result of the selected wave model. Thus, wave model selection can alter the uplift failure probability. In addition, the study proposes parameterized fragility models to enable the uplift risk assessment across a region. The presented results aim to throw light on the proper model selection to produce more realistic risk assessment estimates towards the resilience of coastal infrastructure. / Thesis / Master of Applied Science (MASc)

The main objective of this study is to develop a methodology to assess seismic vulnerability of concrete structures and to estimate direct losses related to structural damage due to future seismic events. This dissertation contains several important components including development of more detailed demand models to enhance accuracy of fragility relationships and development of a damage assessment framework to account for uncertainties. This study focuses on concrete structures in the Mid-America region where a substantial seismic risk exists with potential high intensity earthquakes in this geographic region. The most common types of concrete structures in this area are identified based on the building inventory data and reinforced concrete (RC) frame buildings and tilt-up concrete buildings are selected as case study buildings for further analysis. Using synthetic ground motion records, the structural behavior of the representative case study buildings is analyzed through nonlinear time history analyses. The seismic performance of the case study buildings is evaluated to describe the structural behavior under ground motions. Using more detailed demand models and the corresponding capacity limits, analytical fragility curves are developed based on appropriate failure mechanisms for different structural parameters including different RC frame building heights and different aspect ratios for tilt-up concrete structures. A probabilistic methodology is used to estimate the seismic vulnerability of the case study buildings reflecting the uncertainties in the structural demand and capacity, analytical modeling, and the information used for structural loss estimation. To estimate structural losses, a set of damage states and the corresponding probabilistic framework to map the fragility and the damage state are proposed. Finally, scenario-based assessments are conducted to demonstrate the proposed methodology. Results show that the proposed methodology is successful to evaluate seismic vulnerability of concrete structures and effective in quantifying the uncertainties in the loss estimation process.

Substructure hybrid simulation has been actively investigated in recent years. The simulation method allows for the assessment of seismic performance of structures by representing critical components with physical specimens and the rest of the structure with numerical models. In this study the system level performance of a six-storey structure with self-centering energy dissipative (SCED) braces was validated through pseudo dynamic (PsD) hybrid simulation. Fragility curves are derived for the SCED system. The study presents the configuration of the hybrid simulation and discusses some of the practical intricacies in performing PsD hybrid simulations. In addition the study addresses some of the challenges associated with the substructuring process during a hybrid simulation. Two techniques, extensive analytical study and model updation, are discussed to improve the response from the hybrid simulation accounting for the variation in global response of a structural system depending on which structural element was represented as a physical specimen.

Substructure hybrid simulation has been actively investigated in recent years. The simulation method allows for the assessment of seismic performance of structures by representing critical components with physical specimens and the rest of the structure with numerical models. In this study the system level performance of a six-storey structure with self-centering energy dissipative (SCED) braces was validated through pseudo dynamic (PsD) hybrid simulation. Fragility curves are derived for the SCED system. The study presents the configuration of the hybrid simulation and discusses some of the practical intricacies in performing PsD hybrid simulations. In addition the study addresses some of the challenges associated with the substructuring process during a hybrid simulation. Two techniques, extensive analytical study and model updation, are discussed to improve the response from the hybrid simulation accounting for the variation in global response of a structural system depending on which structural element was represented as a physical specimen.

No description available.

In this investigation, seismic response of retaining walls constructed with cohesive and cohesionless backfill materials was studied. Fully dynamic analysis based on finite difference method was used to evaluate the performance of retaining walls during the earthquake. The analysis response was verified by the experimental study conducted on a retaining wall system with cohesive backfill material in the literature. The effects of cohesion and free-field peak ground acceleration (PGA) on seismic earth thrust, the point of action of earth thrust, and maximum wall moment during the earthquake were compared with analytical and experimental solutions. The numerical results were compared with various analytical solutions. The motion characteristics of the retaining wall during the earthquake were also considered. The relative displacement of the walls with various backfill cohesions, under different ground motions, and free-field PGAs were investigated. Current analytical and empirical correlations developed based on Newmark sliding block method for estimating retaining wall movement during earthquakes were compared with the numerical approach. Consequently, fragility analyses were conducted to determine the probability of damage to the retaining walls. To evaluate the fragility of the studied models, specific failure criterion was chosen for retaining walls based on the suggested methods in practice. Using numerical approaches, the effects of soil-wall interaction and wall rigidity on the seismic response of retaining walls were also evaluated in earthquake conditions for both cohesive and cohesionless backfill materials. According to the findings, practical correlations were presented for conducting the seismic design of retaining walls.

No description available.

When a structure undergoes seismic excitation, the intensities and spatial distributions of the reactive weights on the structure may not be the same as those assumed in original design. Such a difference is inevitable due to many facts with the random nature (e.g., redistribution of live load), resulting in accidental eccentricity and consequently torsional response in the system. The added torsion can cause excessive deformation and premature failure of the lateral force resisting system and its detrimental effect is typically accounted for in most building design codes with an arbitrarily specified accidental eccentricity value. While it tends to amplify drift response of buildings under earthquake excitations, it is unclear whether the code specified accidental eccentricity is quantitatively adequate or not in seismic fragility assessment of steel moment frames (including low-rise, mid-rise and high-rise frames) with random reactive weight distributions. This thesis applies surveyed dead and live load intensities and distributions to three representative steel moment resisting frame structures that have been widely investigated in a series of projects under the collaboration of the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC), the Applied Technology Council (ATC), and Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering (CUREE), known as SAC. Based on an extensive parametric study and incremental nonlinear dynamic analyses, it is found that variable load intensity and eccentricity had negligible impacts on the inter-story drifts of the low- and high-rise steel moment frames. However, they affect to a higher degree the performance of the mid-rise steel moment frames. Moreover, it is found that under the maximum considered earthquake (MCE) event, the actual drifts in steel moment frames with random reactive weight distributions can be conservatively captured through consideration of the code specified accidental eccentricities.

Highway bridges are considered to be one of the most susceptible constituents of transportation networks when they are subjected to severe natural hazards such as earthquakes and environmental exposures like subfreezing temperatures. To facilitate and enhance pre-hazard event mitigation and post-hazard emergency response strategies, probabilistic risk assessment methodologies have attracted increased attention, recently. Seismic fragility assessment is one of the probabilistic techniques which predicts the damage risk of the structure for a given hazard level. While fragility curves can be developed using different methods, such as expert-based, empirical, experimental, analytical, and hybrid, analytical fragility curves are perceived to be the most reliable and least biased technique. Seismic isolation systems are prevalently used in bridge structures to mitigate the damage risk of bridge components against natural hazards. However, the effectiveness of implementing recently emerged isolators such as Stable Unbonded Fiber Reinforced Elastomeric Isolators (SU-FREI) should be examined by developing analytical fragility curves of retrofitted bridges and quantifying the mitigation in the damage probability of different bridge components. In this regard, incorporating the Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) is critical since the lateral response of bridges relies on the relative stiffness of bridge components, such as columns and isolators and the supporting soil. In addition, all bridge components are exposed to environmental stressors like subfreezing temperature that can alter the seismic response of bridges. In the first phase of this thesis, a seismic fragility assessment is carried out on an existing multi-span continuous reinforced concrete bridge. Two bridge representations are developed to simulate the as-built bridge along with its retrofitted counterpart utilizing SU-FREI. An Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is conducted using 45 synthetic ground motion records developed for eastern Canada and damage limit states are applied to generate fragility curves and determine the probability of damage to different bridge components. Bridges are analyzed in longitudinal and transverse directions, independently, and component- and system-level fragility curves are developed. In the second phase, the previously generated bridge models are expanded to incorporate the SSI effects by introducing the pile groups under piers and abutments. Several interactions including deck-abutment, abutment-embankment, pile-soil, and pile-soil-pile interactions are considered. A significant challenge in this phase is the accurate simulation of the lateral and vertical behavior of pile groups since all pile groups comprised of closely-spaced vertical and battered piles. A ground motion suite consisting of 45 ground motions has been selected, which reflects the seismicity of the bridge site. IDA is conducted to monitor the seismic performance of the bridge from the elastic linear region up to collapse. Fragility curves, which serve as an important decision-support tool have been developed to identify the potential seismic risk of the bridge. In the third phase, a multi-hazard assessment is carried out by conditioning the previously developed bridge models (i.e. monolithic fixed-base, isolated fixed-base, monolithic with SSI, and isolated with SSI) to a range of room and subfreezing temperatures and applying a seismic excitation, simultaneously. The cold temperature behavior of the constitutive materials of different bridge components, namely, concrete, reinforcing steel, rubber, and the supporting soil are studied and reflected in the bridge models. IDA is performed and damage potential of different bridge components are quantified. In summary, it is demonstrated that SU-FREI is a competing alternative for seismic isolation of bridges by offering potentially less manufacturing time and cost, lower weight, and easier installation which is an attractive feature for accelerated bridge construction applications. In all three phases, it is shown that the bridges which are isolated using SU-FREI have improved seismic performance in comparison with monolithic bridges by exhibiting lower probability of damage to the primary bridge components like columns and pile caps and transferring the damage to less important components such as abutments at which damage does not cause bridge closure. In addition, it is shown that seismic isolation using SU-FREI can effectively mitigate the seismic demand and damage potential of the constitutive components of a bridge supported by weak soil. While occurrence of seismic events along with an environmental stressor such as cold temperature can drastically jeopardize the functionality of a bridge supported by weak soil, it is demonstrated that seismic isolation using SU-FREI can significantly alleviate the probability of damage to bridge components. / Dissertation / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

No description available.