Fragment-screening by X-ray crystallography (XFS) is an expensive and low throughput fragment drug discovery screening method, and it requires a lot of optimization for each protein target. The advantages with this screening method are that it is very sensitive, it directly gives the three-dimensional structure of the protein-fragment complexes, and false positives are rarely obtained. The aim of this project was to help Sprint Bioscience assess if the advantages with XFS outweigh the disadvantages, and if this method should be used as a complement to their differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) screening method. An XFS campaign was run using the oncoprotein vaccinia related kinase 1 (VRK1) as a target protein to evaluate this screening method. During the development of the XFS campaign, a diverse fragment library was created which consisted of 298 fragments that were all soluble in DMSO at 1 M concentration. The crystallization of the protein VRK1 was also optimized in this project to get a robust, high throughput crystallization set up which generated crystals that diffracted at higher resolution than 2.0 Å when they were not soaked with fragments. The soaking protocol was also optimized in order to reduce both the steps during the screening procedure and mechanical stress caused to the crystals during handling. Lastly, the created fragment library was used in screening VRK1 at 87.5 mM concentration with XFS. 23 fragment hits could be obtained from the X-ray crystallography screening campaign, and the mean resolution of the crystal structures of the protein-fragment complexes was 1.87Å. 11 of the 23 fragment hits were not identified as hits when they were screened against VRK1 using DSF. XFS was deemed as a suitable and efficient screening method to complement DSF since the hit rate was high and fragments hits could be obtained with this method that could not be obtained with DSF. However, in order to use this screening method a lot of time needs to be spent in optimizing the crystal system so it becomes suitable for fragment screening. Sprint Bioscience would therefore need to evaluate the cost/benefit ratio of using this screening method for each new project.