The full cost of climate change is not accounted for in today’s financial reporting. Today’s sustainability reporting mainly consists of disclosures which do not affect any financial statement. If externalities were accounted for it would help stakeholders become aware of companies’ true sustainability. The purpose of this thesis is to identify and describe ways for companies to account for their climate impact, in general and by incorporating externalities into the financial statements. A qualitative method is used in the form of a descriptive case study with a Swedish perspective. The study is based on interviews with accountants and company representatives who work actively with sustainability reporting issues. The main finding of the study is that the best way to account for negative externalities is to use full cost accounting. However, it is difficult to use in practice since monetising externalities is difficult. The currently most used frameworks (the GRI guidelines and the GHG Protocol) account for externalities to some extent, but have no connection to financial reporting. An evolving framework within integrated reporting has the potential to increase the connection between the current disclosures in sustainability reports and financial reporting. So far the best solution to account for externalities is to separately account for taxes, fees and cap-and-trade since externalities are internalised in these costs. The effects of accounting for negative externalities will differ depending on the degree of climate impact the company has. It will also depend on how far down the value-chain emissions are accounted for. It will nevertheless be an incentive to reduce climate impact and act as a management tool. / Den fulla kostnaden av klimatförändringar redovisas inte i dagens finansiella redovisning. Dagens hållbarhetsredovisning består mestadels av upplysningar som inte påverkar några finansiella rapporter. Om externaliteter redovisades skulle det hjälpa intressenter att bli medvetna om företags verkliga hållbarhet. Syftet med uppsatsen är att identifiera och beskriva sätt för företag att redovisa sin klimatpåverkan. Både generellt och i de finansiella rapporterna. En kvalitativ metod används i form av en beskrivande fallstudie med svenskt perspektiv. Studien är baserad på intervjuer med redovisningskonsulter och företagsrepresentanter som arbetar aktivt med frågor som rör hållbarhetsredovisning. Den viktigaste slutsatsen av studien är att det bästa sättet att redovisa negativa externaliteter är att använda full cost accounting. Dock är det svårt att använda i praktiken eftersom det är svårt att monetärisera externaliteter. De för närvarande mest använda ramverken (GRIs riktlinjer och GHG Protocol) inkluderar till viss del externaliteter, men har ingen koppling till finansiella rapporter. Ett ramverk inom integrerad rapportering är under utveckling och det kan potentiellt öka kopplingen mellan upplysningarna i hållbarhetsredovisningar och finansiell rapportering. Den hittills bästa lösningen för att redovisa externaliteter är att separat redovisa miljöskatter, avgifter och handel med utsläppsrätter eftersom externaliteter internaliseras i dessa kostnader. Effekterna av att redovisa negativa externaliteter kommer att bero på företagets grad av klimatpåverkan. Det kommer också att bero på hur långt ner i värdekedjan utsläpp redovisas. Det kommer oavsett att bli ett incitament för att minska klimatpåverkan och fungera som ett verktyg för förvaltning och styrning av företaget.

The study of the full cost method of accounting for finding costs in the petroleum industry is significant because it offers a unique opportunity to examine and emerging accounting practice and will indicate some of the reasons for a shift in the reporting practices of a portion of the industry.

A proposta deste trabalho é apresentar o Processo Analítico Hierárquico e demonstrar que sua utilização é válida para a construção da Avaliação de Custos Completos. Também é proposta deste texto apresentar o programa Decision Lens que implementa tal teoria. Outro objetivo desta dissertação é desenvolver e aplicar um método de Avaliação de Custos Completos estimada pelos Envolvidos-Interessados chegando-se até o ranking de recursos energéticos e comparando-o com o ranking da valoração determinística. Para se justificar a validade e viabilidade do Processo Analítico Hierárquico dentro da Avaliação de Custos Completos explica-se a teoria que o embasa. É também desenvolvido um exemplo onde todos os cálculos são feitos manualmente, até se chegar ao ranking de recursos energéticos finais. O mesmo exercício é desenvolvido no programa Decision Lens, comparando-se, assim, o resultado do exemplo manual com o exemplo desenvolvido no programa e validando-o. Para o desenvolvimento e aplicação de um método de Avaliação de Custos Completos valorado pelos Envolvidos-Interessados são realizadas atividades dentro do projeto FAPESP PIR Araçatuba. O processo de construção da árvore de decisão, com os sub-atributos e recursos energéticos considerados e de obtenção de dados da região piloto são conduzidos no decorrer deste trabalho. A inserção destes dados no programa, bem como a apresentação dos resultados com análise de sensibilidade, são feitas e discutidas. Também é conduzida a confecção da tabela de valores e de seus ratings para a Avaliação de Custos Completos estimada deterministicamente com a inserção dos dados e com a apresentação dos resultados. Por fim, é realizada a comparação do resultado das duas Avaliações de Custos Completos, comentando-se as diferenças e similaridades existentes, mostrando que o resultado de uma é compatível com o resultado da outra. / The purpose of this work is to introduce the Analytic Hierarchy Process and to demonstrate that its use in the Full Cost Accounting Evaluation is valid. The Decision Lens software, which implements the theory, is also introduced. Besides, it has been taken into consideration the objective of developing and applying a method of Full Cost Accounting assessed by the Stakeholders, reaching the ranking of energetic resources and comparing it to the deterministic valuation. In order to justify the validity and feasibility of the Analytic Hierarchy Process within the Full Cost Accounting Evaluation environment, the theory on which it is based has been thoroughly and carefully explained. To that effect, an example has been developed, in which all calculations are done manually up to the definition of the final ranking of energetic resources. The same example is also developed using the Decision Lens software, thus comparing both, the manual and the software results, in order to validate the consistency of the software itself. In order to develop and to apply a method of Full Cost Accounting assessed by the Stakeholders, certain activities have been carried out within the FAPESP IRP project in Araçatuba. The process of building the decision tree and obtaining data from the pilot region, considering sub-criteria and energy resources, has been conducted along the execution of this work. The pertinent software data input, as well as the presentation of results along with a sensitivity analysis have been performed and discussed. The determination of the table of values and its ratings for the Full Cost Accounting deterministically valued has been conducted, as well as the pertinent data insertion along with respective results. Finally, the comparison of results of the two Full Cost Accounting have been made. Their differences and similarities have also been commented, proving that results were compatible.

A proposta deste trabalho é apresentar o Processo Analítico Hierárquico e demonstrar que sua utilização é válida para a construção da Avaliação de Custos Completos. Também é proposta deste texto apresentar o programa Decision Lens que implementa tal teoria. Outro objetivo desta dissertação é desenvolver e aplicar um método de Avaliação de Custos Completos estimada pelos Envolvidos-Interessados chegando-se até o ranking de recursos energéticos e comparando-o com o ranking da valoração determinística. Para se justificar a validade e viabilidade do Processo Analítico Hierárquico dentro da Avaliação de Custos Completos explica-se a teoria que o embasa. É também desenvolvido um exemplo onde todos os cálculos são feitos manualmente, até se chegar ao ranking de recursos energéticos finais. O mesmo exercício é desenvolvido no programa Decision Lens, comparando-se, assim, o resultado do exemplo manual com o exemplo desenvolvido no programa e validando-o. Para o desenvolvimento e aplicação de um método de Avaliação de Custos Completos valorado pelos Envolvidos-Interessados são realizadas atividades dentro do projeto FAPESP PIR Araçatuba. O processo de construção da árvore de decisão, com os sub-atributos e recursos energéticos considerados e de obtenção de dados da região piloto são conduzidos no decorrer deste trabalho. A inserção destes dados no programa, bem como a apresentação dos resultados com análise de sensibilidade, são feitas e discutidas. Também é conduzida a confecção da tabela de valores e de seus ratings para a Avaliação de Custos Completos estimada deterministicamente com a inserção dos dados e com a apresentação dos resultados. Por fim, é realizada a comparação do resultado das duas Avaliações de Custos Completos, comentando-se as diferenças e similaridades existentes, mostrando que o resultado de uma é compatível com o resultado da outra. / The purpose of this work is to introduce the Analytic Hierarchy Process and to demonstrate that its use in the Full Cost Accounting Evaluation is valid. The Decision Lens software, which implements the theory, is also introduced. Besides, it has been taken into consideration the objective of developing and applying a method of Full Cost Accounting assessed by the Stakeholders, reaching the ranking of energetic resources and comparing it to the deterministic valuation. In order to justify the validity and feasibility of the Analytic Hierarchy Process within the Full Cost Accounting Evaluation environment, the theory on which it is based has been thoroughly and carefully explained. To that effect, an example has been developed, in which all calculations are done manually up to the definition of the final ranking of energetic resources. The same example is also developed using the Decision Lens software, thus comparing both, the manual and the software results, in order to validate the consistency of the software itself. In order to develop and to apply a method of Full Cost Accounting assessed by the Stakeholders, certain activities have been carried out within the FAPESP IRP project in Araçatuba. The process of building the decision tree and obtaining data from the pilot region, considering sub-criteria and energy resources, has been conducted along the execution of this work. The pertinent software data input, as well as the presentation of results along with a sensitivity analysis have been performed and discussed. The determination of the table of values and its ratings for the Full Cost Accounting deterministically valued has been conducted, as well as the pertinent data insertion along with respective results. Finally, the comparison of results of the two Full Cost Accounting have been made. Their differences and similarities have also been commented, proving that results were compatible.

O Planejamento Energético tradicional geralmente privilegia os custos econômicos dos recursos energéticos, relegando ao segundo plano questões políticas, sociais e ambientais. Este trabalho pretende estimular a mudança desta abordagem através da proposição de um modelo de caracterização de recursos energéticos integrando todas essas quatro dimensões. São dois seus objetivos: o fornecimento de uma metodologia para avaliar o custo global dos recursos energéticos e de outra para estimar o potencial de tais recursos. Para facilitar o processo de avaliação, o modelo sugere o uso da ACC - Avaliação de Custos Completos, a qual permite a análise qualitativa e quantitativa de custos, reduzindo a necessidade de dados quantitativos, limitados em certos casos. Ilustra-se a aplicação do modelo com um exemplo de caracterização dos recursos na região de Araçatuba, localizada no Oeste Paulista. Os resultados revelam que, quando considerados os custos globais, a adoção de recursos renováveis apresenta grande competitividade, ao contrário de outros que, apesar de serem economicamente atraentes, não apresentam custos globais aceitáveis. / The Traditional Energy Planning usually favors technical-economic costs, relegating political, social and environmental issues to a less important level of analyses. This work tries to encourage a change in such approach by elaborating a model of energy resources characterization integrating all four dimensions - environmental, political, social and economic. The model aims at two objectives: providing a method of assessing the global cost of energy resources and estimating its potential considering the limitations provided by these dimensions. The integration of distinct elements constitutes a complex and tricky activity that can result in inaccurate results if not taken carefully. To minimize this complexity, the Model suggests the use of the Full Cost Accounting - FCA - method, which allows the consideration of quantitative and qualitative costs, reducing the demand for quantitative data, limited in some cases. The Model has been applied in the characterization of the region of Araçatuba, located in the western part of the state of São Paulo, the most populated state in Brazil. The results reveal that the adoption of renewable sources is quite attractive, especially when global costs are taken into account. On the other hand, other resources don\'t present acceptable global costs despite being economically attractive.

O Planejamento Energético tradicional geralmente privilegia os custos econômicos dos recursos energéticos, relegando ao segundo plano questões políticas, sociais e ambientais. Este trabalho pretende estimular a mudança desta abordagem através da proposição de um modelo de caracterização de recursos energéticos integrando todas essas quatro dimensões. São dois seus objetivos: o fornecimento de uma metodologia para avaliar o custo global dos recursos energéticos e de outra para estimar o potencial de tais recursos. Para facilitar o processo de avaliação, o modelo sugere o uso da ACC - Avaliação de Custos Completos, a qual permite a análise qualitativa e quantitativa de custos, reduzindo a necessidade de dados quantitativos, limitados em certos casos. Ilustra-se a aplicação do modelo com um exemplo de caracterização dos recursos na região de Araçatuba, localizada no Oeste Paulista. Os resultados revelam que, quando considerados os custos globais, a adoção de recursos renováveis apresenta grande competitividade, ao contrário de outros que, apesar de serem economicamente atraentes, não apresentam custos globais aceitáveis. / The Traditional Energy Planning usually favors technical-economic costs, relegating political, social and environmental issues to a less important level of analyses. This work tries to encourage a change in such approach by elaborating a model of energy resources characterization integrating all four dimensions - environmental, political, social and economic. The model aims at two objectives: providing a method of assessing the global cost of energy resources and estimating its potential considering the limitations provided by these dimensions. The integration of distinct elements constitutes a complex and tricky activity that can result in inaccurate results if not taken carefully. To minimize this complexity, the Model suggests the use of the Full Cost Accounting - FCA - method, which allows the consideration of quantitative and qualitative costs, reducing the demand for quantitative data, limited in some cases. The Model has been applied in the characterization of the region of Araçatuba, located in the western part of the state of São Paulo, the most populated state in Brazil. The results reveal that the adoption of renewable sources is quite attractive, especially when global costs are taken into account. On the other hand, other resources don\'t present acceptable global costs despite being economically attractive.

Efficient waste management enables the protection of human health, reducing environmental pollution, saving of natural resources, and achieving sustainable and profitable management of energy. In many countries, the general guidelines for waste management are set by national or local waste management plans. Various models provide local authorities with decision-making tools in planning long-term waste management scenarios.This study aims at providing a special model framework for the evaluation of ecological–economic efficiency (ECO-EE) of waste management. This will serve as an information support tool for decision making by actors of a solid waste management (SWM) scheme, primarily at the municipal and regional levels. The objective of this study is to apply the waste management’s efficient decision (WAMED) model along with the company statistical business tool for environmental recovery indicator (COSTBUSTER) model to SWM and municipal solid waste (MSW) schemes in general in order to evaluate and improve their ECO-EE. COSTBUSTER is a mathematical indicator for the size and extent of implementation costs of a certain SWM scheme, compared with the total size of the average financial budget of a SWM actor of a certain kind. In particular, WAMED is proposed for evaluating the suitability to invest in baling technology. Baling of solid waste is an emerging technology which is extensively used worldwide to temporarily store waste for either incineration or recovery of raw materials. The model for efficient use of resources for optimal production economy (the EUROPE model) is for the first time applied to emissions from baling facilities. It has been analysed how cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and full cost accounting (FCA) can facilitate environmental optimisation of SWM schemes. The effort in this work represents a continuation of such ambitions as an enlargement of the research area of CBA based modelling within SWM. In the thesis, certain theoretical and economic aspects of SWM were analysed as case studies. A shift of viewpoints within the field of waste management is presented. This shift is in accordance with the prevailing concept of sustainable development, as commonly understood. It is concluded that in the practical SWM context, the findings of the study point at the possibilities to modify the common CBA- and FCA-based methods by WAMED, COSTBUSTER, and EUROPE. Therefore, it can be said that estimations in a SWM scheme can be carried out by using certain economic model, if properly modified in a logical and plausible way. New principles for cost allocation to SWM residual products are presented in the current work. They imply strong industrial cost saving incentives through promoting the introduction of new and improved processing technologies for rest-waste. Such incentives then strongly promote investments that are likely to improve both the environment and the corporate profitability. Thereby, the occurrence of non-commercialised, and hence not utilized, wastes is reduced. This improves the short term corporate economy through saving raw materials such as solid waste fuel, spending less time for administrating waste flows, and less wear and tear of the plant machinery. Additional environmental advantages which affect the balance sheets in a favourable way are related to the long-term business economy and extended environmental goodwill. This is due to the recently introduced way of considering solid waste as regular goods in financial terms - the equality principle. If waste is seen as goods, and not wasted in landfills, the environment will improve. This, in turn, leads to an improved quality of life. Based on the current study, it is recommended to apply WAMED to SWM schemes in order to evaluate their ECO–EE to justify decision making and investments. Also, it is recommended to apply COSTBUSTER, based on the current WAMED outcome, to SWM schemes to determine their relative size and extent. It is recommended to apply EUROPE to the emissions in case of accidental burning, treatment of leachate, andabatement with odours at any SWM scheme, based on the induced economic incentives, in order to reduce unwanted substances and phenomena.