by Lau Wing Chung. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1985 / Bibliography: leaves 209-236

by To Siu-wing. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1993. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 182-195). / ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS --- p.VI / ABSTRACT --- p.VII / LIST OF TABLES --- p.IX / LIST OF FIGURES --- p.XI / ABBREVIATIONS --- p.XVII / Chapter PART I --- GENERAL ASPECTS / Chapter CHAPTER 1 --- GENERAL INTRODUCTION --- p.1 / Chapter CHAPTER 2 --- LITERATURE REVIEW / Chapter 2.1. --- History of fungal protoplast fusion / Chapter 2.1.1. --- Fungal protoplast preparation technique --- p.4 / Chapter 2.1.2. --- Application of fungal protoplasts --- p.5 / Chapter 2.2. --- Protoplast fusion by polyethene glycol (PEG) --- p.9 / Chapter 2.3. --- Incompatibility system in fungi --- p.10 / Chapter 2.4. --- Characterization of fusion products by genetic markers --- p.12 / Chapter PART II --- OPTIMIZATION OF PROTOPLAST RELEASE AND PROTOPLAST FUSION STUDIES / Chapter CHAPTER 3 --- PROTOPLAST ISOLATION OF Pleurotus florida AND Schizophyllum commune / Chapter 3.1. --- Introduction --- p.14 / Chapter 3.2. --- Materials and methods / Chapter 3.2.1. --- Strains and culture media --- p.14 / Chapter 3.2.2. --- Protoplast isolation in different types and concentrations of lytic enzyme --- p.15 / Chapter 3.2.3. --- Protoplast isolation using mycelium with different culture ages --- p.17 / Chapter 3.2.4. --- Protoplast isolation in different types and concentrations of osmotic stabilizers --- p.17 / Chapter 3.2.5. --- Collection of protoplast by centrifugation --- p.18 / Chapter 3.3. --- Results / Chapter 3.3.1. --- Effect of type and concentration of lytic enzyme --- p.19 / Chapter 3.3.2. --- Efficiency of protoplast isolation from mycelia with different culture ages --- p.25 / Chapter 3.3.3. --- Effect of types and concentrations of osmotic stabilizers --- p.28 / Chapter 3.3.4. --- Collecting efficiency of protoplast by centrifugation --- p.31 / Chapter 3.4. --- Discussion / Chapter 3.4.1. --- Choice of lytic enzyme system and time for enzyme digestion --- p.33 / Chapter 3.4.2. --- Culture age for maximum protoplast yield --- p.34 / Chapter 3.4.3. --- Choice of concentration and type of osmotic stabilizers --- p.35 / Chapter CHAPTER 4 --- PROTOPLAST FUSION OF Pleurotus florida AND Schizophyllum commune / Chapter 4.1. --- Introduction --- p.38 / Chapter 4.2. --- Materials and methods / Chapter 4.2.1. --- Protoplast formation and size of protoplasts --- p.39 / Chapter 4.2.2. --- Fluorescent staining of protoplasts' nuclei --- p.39 / Chapter 4.2.3. --- Stability of the genetics markers / Chapter 4.2.3.1. --- Preparation of media for checking the presence of genetics markers --- p.40 / Chapter 4.2.3.2. --- Determining the presence of auxotrophic as well as drug resistance markers --- p.42 / Chapter 4.2.4. --- Regeneration of mycelium from protoplast --- p.42 / Chapter 4.2.5. --- Protoplast fusion and screening of fusion products --- p.45 / Chapter 4.3. --- Results / Chapter 4.3.1. --- Size of protoplasts ofPf67 and Scl7 --- p.48 / Chapter 4.3.2. --- Proportion of protoplasts bearing nucleus --- p.48 / Chapter 4.3.3. --- Protoplast regeneration in regeneration medium / Chapter 4.3.3.1. --- Protoplasts regeneration morphologies --- p.52 / Chapter 4.3.3.2. --- Regeneration frequencies and back mutation frequencies of Pf67 and Scl7 protoplasts --- p.58 / Chapter 4.3.4. --- Effect of PEG fusion treatment on auxotrophic and drug resistance markers of Pf67 and Scl7 --- p.60 / Chapter 4.3.5. --- Fusion products obtained from screening process --- p.61 / Chapter 4.4. --- Discussion / Chapter 4.4.1. --- Effect of protoplast isolation and PEG treatment on the two fusion parents --- p.63 / Chapter 4.4.2. --- Structural heterogeneity of protoplasts --- p.64 / Chapter 4.4.3. --- Polymorphic nature of protoplast regeneration --- p.67 / Chapter 4.4.4. --- Protoplast fusion frequence --- p.67 / Chapter PART III --- ANALYSIS OF FUSION PARENTS AND FUSION PRODUCTS / Chapter CHAPTER 5 --- MORPHOLOGICAL AND CYTOLOGICAL STUDIES / Chapter 5.1. --- Introduction --- p.69 / Chapter 5.2. --- Materials and methods / Chapter 5.2.1. --- Strains --- p.69 / Chapter 5.2.2. --- Study on colonial and mycelial morphology --- p.70 / Chapter 5.2.3. --- Fluorescent staining of mycelial nuclei with DAPI --- p.70 / Chapter 5.2.4. --- Study on fruit body and basidial morphology / Chapter 5.2.4.1. --- Fruiting on agar plate --- p.71 / Chapter 5.2.4.2. --- Scanning electron microscopic examination --- p.73 / Chapter 5.3. --- Results / Chapter 5.3.1. --- Variation of colonial morphology --- p.74 / Chapter 5.3.2. --- Morphologies and the number of nuclei in the mycelial cells of fusion parents and fusion products --- p.76 / Chapter 5.3.3. --- Fruit body morphology --- p.82 / Chapter 5.3.4. --- Basidial morphology --- p.84 / Chapter 5.4. --- Discussion --- p.87 / Chapter CHAPTER 6 --- PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF FUSION PARENTS AS WELL AS FUSION PRODUCTS BY INVESTIGATING THE GROWTH RESPONSES TO DRUGS / Chapter 6.1. --- Introduction --- p.90 / Chapter 6.2. --- Materials and methods / Chapter 6.2.1. --- Strains and media --- p.96 / Chapter 6.2.2. --- Growth responses of the strains to different concentrations of drugs --- p.97 / Chapter 6.3. --- Results / Chapter 6.3.1. --- Comparison of growth pattern as well as growth rate between fusion parents and fusion regenerants --- p.98 / Chapter 6.3.2. --- Growth responses of fusion parents and fusion products on complete medium --- p.105 / Chapter 6.3.3. --- Growth responses of fusion parents and fusion regenerants on complete medium with acriflavin --- p.108 / Chapter 6.3.4. --- Growth responses of fusion parents and fusion products on complete medium with guaiacol --- p.111 / Chapter 6.4. --- Discussion / Chapter 6.4.1. --- General considerations on experimental design --- p.115 / Chapter 6.4.2. --- Growth responses of protoplast regenerants of either fusion parents --- p.116 / Chapter 6.4.3. --- Growth responses on complete medium without fungitoxic drug --- p.117 / Chapter 6.4.4. --- Growth responses on the acriflavin agar medium --- p.118 / Chapter 6.4.5. --- Growth responses on guaiacol agar medium --- p.119 / Chapter 6.4.6. --- Summary --- p.120 / Chapter CHAPTER 7 --- GENETICAL STUDIES / Chapter 7.1. --- Introduction --- p.121 / Chapter 7.2. --- Materials and methods / Chapter 7.2.1. --- Segregation tests of auxotrophic and drug resistance markers in progeny of dikaryotic fusion product --- p.127 / Chapter 7.2.2. --- Complementation test of fusion products as well as the spore germinants of dikaryotic fusion product PS1 --- p.129 / Chapter 7.2.3. --- Recovery of the individual nuclear type of dikaryotic fusion product PS1 --- p.130 / Chapter 7.2.4. --- Genomic fingerprinting / Chapter 7.2.4.1. --- Strains and culture medium --- p.133 / Chapter 7.2.4.2. --- Genomic DNA preparation by cesium chloride (CsCl) method --- p.135 / Chapter 7.2.4.3. --- Genomic DNA preparation by chloroform :TE saturated phenol method --- p.136 / Chapter 7.2.4.4. --- Qualitative analysis of genomic DNA --- p.137 / Chapter 7.2.4.5. --- Quantitative analysis of genomic DNA --- p.137 / Chapter 7.2.4.6. --- DNA amplification by arbitrarily primed -polymerase chain reaction --- p.138 / Chapter 7.3. --- Results / Chapter 7.3.1. --- Progeny analysis and determination of auxotrophic as well as drug resistance markers --- p.140 / Chapter 7.3.2. --- Complementation tests of the fusion products as well as the spore germinants of dikaryotic fusion product PS1 --- p.143 / Chapter 7.3.3. --- Monokaryotic protoplast regenerants of dikaryotic fusion product PS1 --- p.147 / Chapter 7.3.4. --- Studies on extraction of undigested genomic DNA --- p.148 / Chapter 7.3.5. --- Genomic fingerprinting by AP-PCR --- p.155 / Chapter 7.4. --- Discussion / Chapter 7.4.1. --- Genomic DNA extraction --- p.161 / Chapter 7.4.2. --- Recovery of the individual nuclear type of dikaryotic fusion product PS1 --- p.165 / Chapter 7.4.3. --- Genomic changes in fusion products --- p.167 / Chapter 7.4.4. --- Progeny analysis and determination of auxotrophic as well as drug resistance markers --- p.171 / Chapter PART IV --- SUMMING-UP / Chapter CHAPTER 8 --- GENERAL SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION REMARKS / Chapter 8.1. --- General summary --- p.176 / Chapter 8.2. --- Conclusion remarks and future studies --- p.179 / REFERENCES --- p.182 / APPENDIX A SOLUTIONS

by Jiong Zhao. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1994. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 197-217). / Acknowledgments --- p.III / Abstract --- p.IX / Abbreviations --- p.XI / Chapter Chapter 1. --- General Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- What is a mushroom? --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- Mushroom Genetics: its development and prospective --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2.1 --- Genome karyotype by pulsed field gel electrophoresis analysis --- p.2 / Chapter 1.2.2 --- Mitochondrial Genetics --- p.4 / Chapter 1.2.3 --- Mating type genes --- p.5 / Chapter 1.2.4 --- Transformation --- p.7 / Chapter 1.2.5 --- Parasexual processes --- p.8 / Chapter 1.2.6 --- Mushroom breeding --- p.11 / Chapter Chapter 2. --- Literature review: Protoplast fusion in fungi --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1 --- Introduction --- p.14 / Chapter 2.2 --- Protoplast fusion in yeasts --- p.14 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Intraspecific fusion --- p.14 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- Interspecific fusion --- p.15 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- Intergeneric fusion --- p.16 / Chapter 2.3 --- Protoplast fusion in some Filamentous fungi --- p.17 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- Aspergillus --- p.17 / Chapter 2.3.2 --- Fusarium --- p.18 / Chapter 2.3.3 --- Tricoderma --- p.19 / Chapter 2.4 --- Protoplast fusion in strains --- p.21 / Chapter 2.4.1 --- Protoplast isolation and regeneration --- p.21 / Chapter 2.4.2 --- Intraspecific fusion in mushroom species --- p.24 / Chapter 2.4.3 --- Interspecific fusion in mushroom species --- p.24 / Chapter 2.4.4 --- Intergeneric fusion in mushroom species --- p.26 / Chapter 2.4.5 --- Transfer of nuclei in mushroom species --- p.27 / Chapter 2.5 --- General conclusions about literatures --- p.27 / Chapter 2.5.1 --- Brief points about fungal protoplast fusion --- p.27 / Chapter 2.5.2 --- Some arguements about fusion works in mushrooms strains --- p.31 / Chapter 2.5.2.1 --- Classification of parental strains --- p.31 / Chapter 2.5.2.2 --- Control experiments --- p.31 / Chapter 2.5.2.3 --- Indentification methods of hybrids --- p.32 / Chapter 2.6 --- General research ideas about experiments --- p.33 / Chapter Chapter 3 --- Protoplast isolation and regeneration in some mushroom species --- p.37 / Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.37 / Chapter 3.2 --- Materials and Methods --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Strains --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- Media --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- Protoplast release --- p.40 / Chapter 3.2.4 --- Protoplast regeneration --- p.41 / Chapter 3.3 --- Results and Discussion --- p.41 / Chapter 3.3.1 --- Effect of culture age --- p.41 / Chapter 3.3.2 --- Effect of lytic enzyme --- p.42 / Chapter 3.3.3 --- Effect of concentration of mycelium --- p.45 / Chapter 3.3.4 --- Effect of filter system --- p.46 / Chapter 3.3.5 --- Effect of different regeneration protocols --- p.48 / Chapter 3.3.6 --- Effect of soluable starch --- p.49 / Chapter 3.3.7 --- Effect of PEG on the regeneration frequency --- p.50 / Chapter 3.4 --- Conclusions --- p.53 / Chapter Chapter 4 --- Monokaryotization by protoplasting technique in some heterothallic mushroom species --- p.54 / Chapter 4.1 --- Introduction --- p.54 / Chapter 4.2 --- Materials and Methods --- p.55 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- Strains and media --- p.55 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- Production of neo-monokaryons by protoplast technique --- p.55 / Chapter 4.2.3 --- Identification of mating types in protoplasted monokaryons --- p.57 / Chapter 4.3 --- Results / Chapter 4.3.1 --- Formation of neo-monokaryons --- p.57 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- Monokaryotization in different strains --- p.60 / Chapter 4.3.3 --- Comparison of parental and protoplasted monokaryons --- p.60 / Chapter 4.3.4 --- Comparison of regeneration rate of parental monokaryons --- p.62 / Chapter 4.4 --- Discussion / Chapter 4.4.1 --- Differences of regeneration time in monokaryons and dikaryons --- p.64 / Chapter 4.4.2 --- Genetic differences between parental and neo-monokaryons --- p.64 / Chapter 4.4.3 --- Mechanism for the production of neo-monokaryons --- p.65 / Chapter 4.4.4 --- Advantages of protoplasting technique in mushroom breeding --- p.65 / Chapter 4.4.5 --- Protoplasting technique in the identification of fusion hybrids --- p.67 / Chapter 4.5 --- Couclusions --- p.68 / Chapter Chapter 5 --- Intraspecific hybridization in Coprinus cinereus and Schizophyllum commune by PEG-induced protoplast fusion and electrofusion --- p.69 / Chapter 5.1 --- Introduction --- p.69 / Chapter 5.2 --- Materials and Methods / Chapter 5.2.1 --- Strains and Media --- p.70 / Chapter 5.2.2 --- Fusogen --- p.70 / Chapter 5.2.3 --- Inactivation chemicals --- p.71 / Chapter 5.2.4 --- Inactivation of protoplasts --- p.71 / Chapter 5.2.5 --- PEG induced protoplast fusion --- p.72 / Chapter 5.2.6 --- Electrofusion --- p.72 / Chapter 5.2.7 --- Investigation of protoplast fusion yield and fusion frequency --- p.73 / Chapter 5.2.8 --- Comparison of mycelium growth rate --- p.73 / Chapter 5.2.9 --- Fruiting test --- p.74 / Chapter 5.3 --- Results / Chapter 5.3.1 --- Inactivation by IA and DP --- p.76 / Chapter 5.3.2 --- Effect of different fusogens on fusion frequency --- p.79 / Chapter 5.3.3 --- Effect of different fusion protocols on fusion frequency --- p.79 / Chapter 5.3.4 --- Optimization of electrofusion --- p.80 / Chapter 5.3.5 --- Fusion frequency resulted by PEG and electrofusion --- p.83 / Chapter 5.3.6 --- Comparison of colony diameters and fruiting time --- p.84 / Chapter 5.4 --- Discussion / Chapter 5.4.1 --- Inactivation of protoplasts by biochemical inhibitors --- p.85 / Chapter 5.4.2 --- Optimization of PEG induced fusion --- p.86 / Chapter 5.4.3 --- Optimization of electrofusion --- p.86 / Chapter 5.4.4 --- Identification of fusion heterokaryons --- p.87 / Chapter 5.4.5 --- Comparison of PEG and electrofusion --- p.89 / Chapter 5.4.2 --- Effect of mitochondria --- p.90 / Chapter 5.5 --- Couclusions --- p.91 / Chapter Chapter 6 --- Interspecific hybridization between Volvariella volvacea and Volvariella bomhycina by protoplast fusion --- p.92 / Chapter 6.1 --- Introduction --- p.92 / Chapter 6.2 --- Materials and Methods / Chapter 6.2.1 --- Strains and Media --- p.93 / Chapter 6.2.2 --- Protoplast production and regeneration --- p.94 / Chapter 6.2.3 --- Inactivation of protoplasts --- p.94 / Chapter 6.2.4 --- Protoplast fusion --- p.94 / Chapter 6.2.5 --- Selection of fusion products --- p.95 / Chapter 6.2.6 --- Analyses of progeny --- p.95 / Chapter 6.2.7 --- Identification of fusants by protoplasting technique --- p.96 / Chapter 6.2.8 --- Nuclear DNA contents in parents and hybrids --- p.96 / Chapter 6.2.9 --- Genomic DNA amplification by arbitraly primers --- p.96 / Chapter 6.2.10 --- Amplification by nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA --- p.97 / Chapter 6.2.11 --- Fruiting test --- p.97 / Chapter 6.3 --- Results / Chapter 6.3.1 --- Inactivation of Vb10 protoplasts --- p.98 / Chapter 6.3.2 --- Low temperature effect on Vv34 --- p.100 / Chapter 6.3.3 --- Selection of fusants --- p.100 / Chapter 6.3.4 --- Analyses of progeny --- p.106 / Chapter 6.3.5 --- Identification by protoplasting technique --- p.108 / Chapter 6.3.6 --- Nuclear DNA contents in parents and hybrids --- p.110 / Chapter 6.3.7 --- Arbitraly primer amplified PCR fingerprinting --- p.113 / Chapter 6.3.8 --- rDNA PCR results --- p.119 / Chapter 6.3.9 --- Interspecific variations / Chapter 6.3.10 --- Genome analysis of hybrids by pulse field gel electrophoresis / Chapter 6.3.11 --- Fruiting test / Chapter 6.4 --- Discussion / Chapter 6.4.1 --- Strain choice --- p.125 / Chapter 6.4.2 --- Low temperature strains --- p.125 / Chapter 6.4.3 --- Nuclear DNA content --- p.125 / Chapter 6.4.4 --- AP-PCR and RAPDs markers --- p.126 / Chapter 6.4.5 --- Interspecific fusion in Volvariella --- p.126 / Chapter 6.5 --- Couclusions --- p.130 / Chapter Chapter 7 --- Intergeneric hybridization between Schizophyllum commune and Pleurotus florida by protoplast fusion --- p.131 / Chapter 7.1 --- Introduction --- p.131 / Chapter 7.2 --- Materials and Methods / Chapter 7.2.1 --- Strains and Media --- p.132 / Chapter 7.2.2 --- Protoplast fusion --- p.133 / Chapter 7.2.3 --- Analyses of progeny --- p.134 / Chapter 7.2.4 --- Phylogenetic analysis --- p.135 / Chapter 7.2.5 --- Fruiting test --- p.135 / Chapter 7.3 --- Results / Chapter 7.3.1 --- Selection of fusion products --- p.135 / Chapter 7.3.2 --- Analyses of fusion progeny --- p.139 / Chapter 7.3.3 --- Identification by protoplasting technique --- p.143 / Chapter 7.3.4 --- Determination of nuclear DNA contents --- p.145 / Chapter 7.3.5 --- rDNA PCR analysis in fusion --- p.148 / Chapter 7.3.6 --- Identification of hybrids by AP-PCR and RAPDs markers --- p.151 / Chapter 7.3.7 --- Phylogenetic analysis --- p.162 / Chapter 7.3.8 --- Fruiting test --- p.164 / Chapter 7.4 --- Discussion --- p.165 / Chapter 7.5 --- Couclusions --- p.169 / Chapter Chapter 8 --- Protoplast fusion in shiitake and other species --- p.171 / Chapter 8.1 --- Introduction --- p.172 / Chapter 8.2 --- Materials and Methods --- p.172 / Chapter 8.3 --- Results and Discussion --- p.173 / Chapter 8.4 --- Couclusion --- p.179 / Chapter Chapter 9. --- General discussion and conclusions --- p.180 / Appendix 1. Determination of ploidy in some mushrooms --- p.187 / Appendix 2. Genomic DNA Isolation --- p.188 / Appendix 3. Arbitrary primer polymerase chain reaction --- p.190 / Appendix 4. rDNA PCR Amplification conditions --- p.193 / Appendix 5. Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis --- p.195 / Appendix 6. Genetic distance analysis in hybrids and their parents --- p.196 / References --- p.197

O estudo de fungos celulolíticos tem-se mostrado relevante, tendo em vista o interesse econômico do complexo celulases, especialmente na indústria têxtil e, mais recentemente, para propósitos energéticos. No presente trabalho, a fusão de protoplastos foi utilizada para combinar genótipos de mutantes parcialmente desreprimidos para produção de celulases de Penicillium echinulatum (9A02S1B9) e richoderma harzianum (AS5CH3), utilizando a técnica do doador morto, buscando-se obter recombinantes com maior produção de celulases. Nesta estratégia, ambas as linhagens tiveram seu micélio tratado com Glucanex 0,01 g/mL, para quebra da parede celular. Os protoplastos resultantes da linhagem portadora de marca de resistência ao benomil (9A02S1B9) foram inativados por calor (técnica do doador morto) de 60oC antes da etapa de fusão, a qual após foi induzida por PEG4000 e Ca2+, com protoplastos da linhagem sensível ao benomil (AS5CH3). A partir de um produto de fusão, foram selecionados 24 sub-clones, após estratégias de estabilização e seleção para precocidade e eficiência na formação de halo de hidrólise de celulose em placas de Petri. Os produtos de fusão apresentaram morfologia e esporulação semelhantes a um dos parentais, sendo treze semelhantes à Penicillium, nove semelhantes à Trichoderma e dois mostrando formas alteradas. Os produtos de fusão que segregaram para morfologia de T. harzianum apresentaram a característica de resistência ao benomil, sendo capazes de crescer e esporular em meios contendo até 100 μg/mL deste inibidor. A morfologia, o perfil de bandas, obtidos por RAPD, e o padrão de secreção de celulases dos produtos de fusão foram sempre mais semelhantes a um dos parentais. Os clones apresentaram variação quanto ao halo de hidrólise de celulose em placas de Petri e na atividade sobre papel filtro FPAases, -glicosidase ou endoglicanase, quando crescidas em cultivo submerso ou em estado sólido. Desta variabilidade, verificaram-se aumentos significativos para algumas das linhagens em relação aos parentais. A aplicação da metodologia de fusão de protoplastos para obter recombinantes entre P. echinulatum e T. harzianum, empregando a técnica do doador morto, mostrou-se adequada na geração de variabilidade para produção de celulases. / Submitted by Ana Guimarães Pereira (agpereir@ucs.br) on 2015-02-12T12:22:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Barbara Lizandra Perini de Souza.pdf: 2248330 bytes, checksum: 2a20339f50d031a74d2a889ddbe2435e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-02-12T12:22:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Barbara Lizandra Perini de Souza.pdf: 2248330 bytes, checksum: 2a20339f50d031a74d2a889ddbe2435e (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The study of cellulolytic fungi has proved to be important, considering economic interest of the cellulase complex, especially in the textile industry and, more recently, for energy purposes. In this work, the protoplast fusion was used to combine genotypes of mutants partially non repressed for cellulases production of Penicillium echinulatum (9A02S1B9) and Trichoderma harzianum (AS5CH3) using the technique dead donor, intending to obtain recombinants with higher cellulases production. In this strategy, both strains had their mycelium treated with Glucanex  0,01 g/mL, to lyse the cell wall. The protoplast obtained from the benomyl-resistant (9A02S1B9) were heat-inactivated (technique of dead donor) at 60ºC, before the step of fusion, induced by PEG4000 and Ca2+, with protoplast of the sensitive-benomyl strain (AS5CH3). Twenty four sub-clones were selected from one fusion product, after stabilization and selection strategies for precocity and efficiency in the formation clearing zones of by cellulose hydrolysis in Petri plates. The fusion products showed similar morphology and sporulation to one of parents, thirteen similar to Penicillium, nine similar to Trichoderma and two showed altered forms. The fusion products which segregate to the morphology of T. harzianum resistance to benomyl, being able to grow and sporulate in media containing up to 100 μg/mL of this inhibitor. The morphology, the profile of bands, obtained by RAPD, and the pattern of cellulase secretion by fusion products were ever more similar to one of parents. The fusants presented variation in the halo of cellulose hydrolysis in Petri plates, and in the activity on filter paper (FPAases), - glicosidase or endoglicanase, when grown submerged cultivation or solid state. From this variability, significant improvement was verified for some of the parental strains. The application of the protoplast fusion methodology to obtain recombinant between P. echinulatum and T. harzianum, using the technique of dead donor, has proved to be adequate to generate variability in the production of cellulases.

O estudo de fungos celulolíticos tem-se mostrado relevante, tendo em vista o interesse econômico do complexo celulases, especialmente na indústria têxtil e, mais recentemente, para propósitos energéticos. No presente trabalho, a fusão de protoplastos foi utilizada para combinar genótipos de mutantes parcialmente desreprimidos para produção de celulases de Penicillium echinulatum (9A02S1B9) e richoderma harzianum (AS5CH3), utilizando a técnica do doador morto, buscando-se obter recombinantes com maior produção de celulases. Nesta estratégia, ambas as linhagens tiveram seu micélio tratado com Glucanex 0,01 g/mL, para quebra da parede celular. Os protoplastos resultantes da linhagem portadora de marca de resistência ao benomil (9A02S1B9) foram inativados por calor (técnica do doador morto) de 60oC antes da etapa de fusão, a qual após foi induzida por PEG4000 e Ca2+, com protoplastos da linhagem sensível ao benomil (AS5CH3). A partir de um produto de fusão, foram selecionados 24 sub-clones, após estratégias de estabilização e seleção para precocidade e eficiência na formação de halo de hidrólise de celulose em placas de Petri. Os produtos de fusão apresentaram morfologia e esporulação semelhantes a um dos parentais, sendo treze semelhantes à Penicillium, nove semelhantes à Trichoderma e dois mostrando formas alteradas. Os produtos de fusão que segregaram para morfologia de T. harzianum apresentaram a característica de resistência ao benomil, sendo capazes de crescer e esporular em meios contendo até 100 μg/mL deste inibidor. A morfologia, o perfil de bandas, obtidos por RAPD, e o padrão de secreção de celulases dos produtos de fusão foram sempre mais semelhantes a um dos parentais. Os clones apresentaram variação quanto ao halo de hidrólise de celulose em placas de Petri e na atividade sobre papel filtro FPAases, -glicosidase ou endoglicanase, quando crescidas em cultivo submerso ou em estado sólido. Desta variabilidade, verificaram-se aumentos significativos para algumas das linhagens em relação aos parentais. A aplicação da metodologia de fusão de protoplastos para obter recombinantes entre P. echinulatum e T. harzianum, empregando a técnica do doador morto, mostrou-se adequada na geração de variabilidade para produção de celulases. / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / The study of cellulolytic fungi has proved to be important, considering economic interest of the cellulase complex, especially in the textile industry and, more recently, for energy purposes. In this work, the protoplast fusion was used to combine genotypes of mutants partially non repressed for cellulases production of Penicillium echinulatum (9A02S1B9) and Trichoderma harzianum (AS5CH3) using the technique dead donor, intending to obtain recombinants with higher cellulases production. In this strategy, both strains had their mycelium treated with Glucanex  0,01 g/mL, to lyse the cell wall. The protoplast obtained from the benomyl-resistant (9A02S1B9) were heat-inactivated (technique of dead donor) at 60ºC, before the step of fusion, induced by PEG4000 and Ca2+, with protoplast of the sensitive-benomyl strain (AS5CH3). Twenty four sub-clones were selected from one fusion product, after stabilization and selection strategies for precocity and efficiency in the formation clearing zones of by cellulose hydrolysis in Petri plates. The fusion products showed similar morphology and sporulation to one of parents, thirteen similar to Penicillium, nine similar to Trichoderma and two showed altered forms. The fusion products which segregate to the morphology of T. harzianum resistance to benomyl, being able to grow and sporulate in media containing up to 100 μg/mL of this inhibitor. The morphology, the profile of bands, obtained by RAPD, and the pattern of cellulase secretion by fusion products were ever more similar to one of parents. The fusants presented variation in the halo of cellulose hydrolysis in Petri plates, and in the activity on filter paper (FPAases), - glicosidase or endoglicanase, when grown submerged cultivation or solid state. From this variability, significant improvement was verified for some of the parental strains. The application of the protoplast fusion methodology to obtain recombinant between P. echinulatum and T. harzianum, using the technique of dead donor, has proved to be adequate to generate variability in the production of cellulases.