Spelling suggestions: "subject:"samma spectrum""
1 |
Test of Decay Rate Parameter Variation due to Antineutrino InteractionsShih-Chieh Liu (5929988) 16 January 2019 (has links)
High precision measurements of a weak interaction decay were conducted to search for possible variation of the decay rate parameter caused by an antineutrino flux. The experiment searched for variation of the <sup>54</sup>Mn electron capture decay rate parameter to a level of precision of 1 part in ∼10<sup>5</sup> by comparing the difference between the decay rate in the presence of an antineutrino flux ∼3×10<sup>12</sup> cm<sup>-2</sup>sec<sup>-1</sup> and no flux measurements. The experiment is located 6.5 meters from the reactor core of the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) in Oak Ridge National Laboratory. A measurement to this level of precision requires a detailed understanding of both systematic and statistical errors. Otherwise, systematic errors in the measurement may mimic fundamental interactions. <div><br></div><div>The gamma spectrum has been collected from the electron capture decay of <sup>54</sup>Mn. What differs in this experiment compared to previous experiments are, (1) a strong, uniform, highly controlled, and repeatable source of antineutrino flux, using a reactor, nearly 50 times higher than the solar neutrino flux on the Earth, (2) the variation of the antineutrino flux from HFIR is 600 times higher than the variation in the solar neutrino flux on the Earth, (3) the extensive use of neutron and gamma-ray shielding around the detectors, (4) a controlled environment for the detector including a fixed temperature, a nitrogen atmosphere, and stable power supplies, (5) the use of precision High Purity Germanium (HPGe) detectors and finally, (6) accurate time stamping of all experimental runs. By using accurate detector energy calibrations, electronic dead time corrections, background corrections, and pile-up corrections, the measured variation in the <sup>54</sup>Mn decay rate parameter is found to be δλ/λ=(0.034±1.38)×10<sup>-5</sup>. This measurement in the presence of the HFIR flux is equivalent to a cross-section of σ=(0.097±1.24)×10<sup>-25 </sup>cm<sup>2</sup>. These results are consistent with no measurable decay rate parameter variation due to an antineutrino flux, yielding a 68% confidence level upper limit sensitivity in δλ/λ <= 1.43×10<sup>-5</sup> or σ<=1.34×10<sup>-25 </sup>cm<sup>2</sup> in cross-section. The cross-section upper limit obtained in this null or no observable effect experiment is ∼10<sup>4</sup> times more sensitive than past experiments reporting positive results in <sup>54</sup>Mn.</div>
|
2 |
Modeling The Temperature of a Calorimeter at Clab : Considering a Thermodynamic Model of The Temperature Evolution of The Calorimeter System 251Ekman, Johannes January 2021 (has links)
It is important to know the heat generated due to nuclear decay in the final repository for spent nuclear fuel. In Sweden, the heating powers generated in spent nuclear fuels are currently measured in the calorimeter System 251 at the Clab facility, Oskarshamn. In order to better measure, and increase understanding, of the temperature measurements in the calorimeter, a simple thermodynamic model of its temperature evolution was developed. The model was described as a system of ordinary differential equations, which were solved, and the solution was applied to calibration measurements of the calorimeter. How precise the model is, how its parameters affect the model, et cetera, are addressed. How the temperature evolution of the system changes as the values of parameters in the model are changed is addressed. The mass correction of the calorimeter could be estimated from this model, which validated the established mass correction of the calorimeter. How the measurement results from the calorimeter would be affected if the volume of the calorimeter was changed was also considered. Additionally, gamma radiation escape from the calorimeter without being detected as heat in the calorimeter. The gamma escape energy fraction was estimated by SERPENT simulations of the calorimeter, as a function of the initial photon energy. The gamma escape was also estimated for different values of the radius of System 251.
|
Page generated in 0.0842 seconds