1 |
Heavy element enrichment of the gas giant planetsCoffey, Jaime Lee 11 1900 (has links)
According to both spectroscopic measurements and interior models, Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune possess gaseous envelopes that are enriched in
heavy elements compared to the Sun. Straightforward application of the
dominant theories of gas giant formation - core accretion and gravitational
instability - fail to provide the observed enrichment, suggesting that the
surplus heavy elements were somehow dumped onto the planets after the
envelopes were already in existence.
Previous work has shown that if giant planets rapidly reached their cur
rent configuration and radii, they do not accrete the remaining planetesimals
efficiently enough to explain their observed heavy-element surplus. We ex
plore the likely scenario that the effective accretion cross-sections of the
giants were enhanced by the presence of the massive circumplanetary disks
out of which their regular satellite systems formed. Perhaps surprisingly,
we find that a simple model with protosatellite disks around Jupiter and
Saturn can meet known constraints without tuning any parameters. Fur
thermore, we show that the heavy-element budgets in Jupiter and Saturn
can be matched slightly better if Saturn’s envelope (and disk) are formed
roughly 0.1 — 10 Myr after that of Jupiter.
We also show that giant planets forming in an initially-compact con
figuration can acquire the observed enrichments if they are surrounded by
similar protosatellite disks.
Protosatellite disks efficiently increase the capture cross-section, and thus
the metallicity, of the giant planets. Detailed models of planet formation
must therefore account for the presence of such disks during the early stages
of solar system formation.
|
2 |
Heavy element enrichment of the gas giant planetsCoffey, Jaime Lee 11 1900 (has links)
According to both spectroscopic measurements and interior models, Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune possess gaseous envelopes that are enriched in
heavy elements compared to the Sun. Straightforward application of the
dominant theories of gas giant formation - core accretion and gravitational
instability - fail to provide the observed enrichment, suggesting that the
surplus heavy elements were somehow dumped onto the planets after the
envelopes were already in existence.
Previous work has shown that if giant planets rapidly reached their cur
rent configuration and radii, they do not accrete the remaining planetesimals
efficiently enough to explain their observed heavy-element surplus. We ex
plore the likely scenario that the effective accretion cross-sections of the
giants were enhanced by the presence of the massive circumplanetary disks
out of which their regular satellite systems formed. Perhaps surprisingly,
we find that a simple model with protosatellite disks around Jupiter and
Saturn can meet known constraints without tuning any parameters. Fur
thermore, we show that the heavy-element budgets in Jupiter and Saturn
can be matched slightly better if Saturn’s envelope (and disk) are formed
roughly 0.1 — 10 Myr after that of Jupiter.
We also show that giant planets forming in an initially-compact con
figuration can acquire the observed enrichments if they are surrounded by
similar protosatellite disks.
Protosatellite disks efficiently increase the capture cross-section, and thus
the metallicity, of the giant planets. Detailed models of planet formation
must therefore account for the presence of such disks during the early stages
of solar system formation.
|
3 |
Heavy element enrichment of the gas giant planetsCoffey, Jaime Lee 11 1900 (has links)
According to both spectroscopic measurements and interior models, Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune possess gaseous envelopes that are enriched in
heavy elements compared to the Sun. Straightforward application of the
dominant theories of gas giant formation - core accretion and gravitational
instability - fail to provide the observed enrichment, suggesting that the
surplus heavy elements were somehow dumped onto the planets after the
envelopes were already in existence.
Previous work has shown that if giant planets rapidly reached their cur
rent configuration and radii, they do not accrete the remaining planetesimals
efficiently enough to explain their observed heavy-element surplus. We ex
plore the likely scenario that the effective accretion cross-sections of the
giants were enhanced by the presence of the massive circumplanetary disks
out of which their regular satellite systems formed. Perhaps surprisingly,
we find that a simple model with protosatellite disks around Jupiter and
Saturn can meet known constraints without tuning any parameters. Fur
thermore, we show that the heavy-element budgets in Jupiter and Saturn
can be matched slightly better if Saturn’s envelope (and disk) are formed
roughly 0.1 — 10 Myr after that of Jupiter.
We also show that giant planets forming in an initially-compact con
figuration can acquire the observed enrichments if they are surrounded by
similar protosatellite disks.
Protosatellite disks efficiently increase the capture cross-section, and thus
the metallicity, of the giant planets. Detailed models of planet formation
must therefore account for the presence of such disks during the early stages
of solar system formation. / Science, Faculty of / Physics and Astronomy, Department of / Graduate
|
4 |
Development of a Self-Consistent Gas Accretion Model for Simulating Gas Giant Formation in Protoplanetary DisksRussell, John L. 22 December 2011 (has links)
The number of extrasolar planet discoveries has increased dramatically over the last 15 years. Nearly 700 exoplanets have currently been observed through a variety of observation techniques. Most of the currently documented exoplanets differ greatly from the planets in our own Solar System, with various combinations of eccentric orbits, short orbital periods, and masses many times that of Jupiter. More recently, planets belonging to a new class of `distant gas giants' have also been discovered with orbits of 30 to 100 times that of Jupiter. The wide variety of different planet formation outcomes stem from a complex interplay between gravitational interactions, hydrodynamic interactions and competitive accretion among the planets that is not yet fully understood.
Simulations performed using a series of modifications to an existing, widely used hydrodynamic code (FARGO) are presented. The main goal is to develop a more rigorous and robust gas accretion scheme that is valid and consistent for the ranges of exolanetary gas giant masses, eccentricities and semimajor axes that have been observed to better understand the mechanisms involved in their formation. The resulting scheme is a more robust and accurate prescription for gas accretion onto planetary cores in a manner that is mostly resolution independent and valid over a large range of masses (less than an Earth mass to multiple Jupiter masses). The modified scheme accounts for multiple, competing, dynamic accretion mechanisms (including atmospheric effects) and their associated time scales between an arbitrary number of protoplanets. This updated accretion scheme provides a means for exploring the entire formation process of gas giants out of a variety of initial conditions in a self-consistent manner. The modifications made to the code as well as simulation results will be discussed and explored.
|
5 |
Numerical Simulations of Giant Planetary Core FormationNGO, HENRY 28 August 2012 (has links)
In the widely accepted core accretion model of planet formation, small rocky and/or icy bodies (planetesimals) accrete to form protoplanetary cores. Gas giant planets are believed to have solid cores that must reach a critical mass, ∼10 Earth masses (ME), after which there is rapid inflow of gas from the gas disk. In order to accrete the gas giants’ massive atmospheres, this step must occur within the gas disk’s lifetime (1 − 10 million years).
Numerical simulations of solid body accretion in the outer Solar System are performed using two integrators. The goal of these simulations is to investigate the effects of important dynamical processes instead of specifically recreating the formation of the Solar System’s giant planets.
The first integrator uses the Symplectic Massive Body Algorithm (SyMBA) with a modification to allow for planetesimal fragmentation. Due to computational constraints, this code has some physical limitations, specifically that the planetesimals themselves cannot grow, so protoplanets must be seeded in the simulations. The second integrator, the Lagrangian Integrator for Planetary Accretion and Dynamics (LIPAD), is more computationally expensive. However, its treatment of planetesimals allows for growth of potential giant planetary cores from a disk consisting only of planetesimals. Thus, this thesis’ preliminary simulations use the first integrator to explore a wider range of parameters while the main simulations use LIPAD to further investigate some specific processes.
These simulations are the first use of LIPAD to study giant planet formation and they identify a few important dynamical processes affecting core formation. Without any fragmentation, cores tend to grow to ∼2ME. When planetesimal fragmentation is included, the resulting fragments are easier to accrete and larger cores are formed (∼4ME). But, in half of the runs, the fragments force the entire system to migrate towards the Sun. In other half, outward migration via scattering off a large number of planetesimal helps the protoplanets grow and survive. However, in a preliminary set of simulations including protoplanetary fragmentation, very few collisions are found to result in accretion so it is difficult for any cores to form. / Thesis (Master, Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy) -- Queen's University, 2012-08-20 14:48:39.443
|
Page generated in 0.0634 seconds