Extensive asynchrony of sexual maturation is characteristic of salmonid females, and, for various reasons, the spawning season can be extended for 4 months, although it generally extends over a 3 week to 2 month period, as in brook trout and northern whitefish. In aquaculture, to ensure high fertilization and egg survival rates, it is recommended that identification of ovulating females be undertaken at least twice weekly. This is time-consuming when keeping large numbers of broodstock with an extended spawning season, and risk of stress damage to fish increases. Ensuring sufficient Arctic grayling broodstock relies on capture of wild animals from natural waters before onset of the spawning season. Capture and long-term holding of wild stocks is associated with high pre-spawning mortality. Due to the high ovulation synchronizing effect, GnRHa is practical for induction of ovulation 1?1.5 months prior to the natural spawning season. This work focused on optimization of methods of hormone-controlled reproduction using GnRHa in brook trout, northern whitefish, and Arctic grayling from Siberia. Because this is the first report of use of GnRHa in these species, emphasis was on optimization of the hormone dose and delivery method along with assessment of effects of GnRHa treatment on postspawning broodstock mortality, egg size, and egg viability. As in other salmonids, GnRHa treatment effectively synchronizes the onset of ovulation in brook trout and northern whitefish. This gives accurate information about ovulatory status of the broodstock and enables planning of the stripping schedule. The most convenient methods were the double acute injection at 25 ?g.kg-1 ?-Arg6,Pro9-NHEt-sGnRHa administered 3 days apart and injection of 25 ?g.kg-1 of emulsified ?-Arg6,Pro9-NHEt-sGnRHa in Freund´s incomplete adjuvant, which prolongs and more effectively stimulates LH secretion and requires only a single injection. Double acute injection at 10 ?g.kg-1 of ?-Tle6,Pro9-NHEt-mGnRHa (Supergestran) was sufficient to induce ovulation in Arctic grayling 1?1.5 months prior to natural spawning, and enabled accelerated stripping and return of wild broodstock to their natural habitat. Single acute injection proved to be ineffective or unreliable in most cases and therefore cannot be recommended. No negative effect of GnRHa or GnRHa-FIA treatments on post-spawning mortality of broodstock was observed. It has to be noted that that to the extent of law Nr. 166/1999 statute book (Czech veterinary law)injective procedures can be carried out just by the veterinarian or by a verinarian-authorized person in veterinarian presence. GnRHa treatment has side-effects and alters egg quality. Apart from in brook trout, egg survival was significantly lower (5?20%) in treated females. Increased hormone dose did not influence egg survival at the levels tested. Egg and hatchling size was lower in treated females compared to untreated specimens irrespective of dose or hormone delivery method. Reduced egg size is, however, not the likely source of reduced viability. In general, our results corroborate results of studies dealing with assessment of effects of hormone treatment on egg quality. Based on current experimental designs it is impossible to identify the cause of the side-effects with certainty. Solving this problem should be priority for future research.

White Crappie (Pomoxis annularis) and Black Crappie (P. nigromaculatus) are popular North American gamefish; however, frequent fluctuations in year class strength present a management challenge for recreational fisheries. Intensive aquaculture production has the potential to address this challenge through controlled hatchery reproduction for supplemental stocking, but further study is needed to refine and optimize techniques. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of hormone injection timing on latency period and spawning success, examined effective cryopreservation techniques for black-stripe Black Crappie sperm (a preferred hatchery phenotype), and compared simulated spring duration on out-of-season spawning success. Latency period for White Crappie did not depend on the diel time of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone injection. Cryopreservation of black-stripe Black Crappie sperm and subsequent fertilization of White Crappie eggs was more effective using 5% dimethyl-sulfoxide than 10% methanol. A longer duration at final spring spawning conditions (3 vs. 2 weeks) increased egg fertilization in out-of-season spawning experiments.

Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os índices de Pulsatilidade (IP) e Resistência (IR) das artérias uterinas, o volume uterino e a espessura endometrial após o uso do Sistema Intra-uterino de Levonorgestrel (SIU-LNG) ou do agonista do GnRHa (GnRHa) em pacientes portadoras de endometriose pélvica. Pacientes e métodos: Setenta e nove mulheres voluntárias, com idade entre 18 e 40 anos, foram incluídas neste ensaio clínico comparativo, prospectivo, randomizado e controlado. Dezoito foram eliminadas do estudo baseadas nos critérios de exclusão, As 61 pacientes remanescentes foram divididas em dois grupos: 31 pacientes fizeram parte do grupo SIU-LNG (uma foi excluída antes da inserção por apresentar-se grávida) e 30 fizeram parte do grupo GnRHa. Foram submetidasa exame ultra-sonográfico transvaginal bidimensional no dia em que iniciaram o tratamento (inserção do SIU-LNG ou administração de uma ampola de 3,75 mg de GnRHa por via intra-muscular) e seis meses após, avaliando a espessura endometrial, o volume uterino e os IR e IP das artérias uterinas. Resultados: Ambos tratamentos promoveram redução da espessura endometrial (6.08±3.00mm para 2.70±0.98mm e 6.96±3.82mm para 3.23±2.32mm - média ±SD, grupo SIU-LNG e grupo GnRHa, respectivamente). O volume uterino teve redução no grupo usuário do GnRHa (86.67±28.38cm3 para 55.27±25.52cm3) sem alteração significativa nas usuárias do SIU-LNG (75.77±20.88cm3 para 75.97±26.62cm3). Em relação à ascularização uterina, notamos incremento dos IP das artérias uterinas em ambos os grupos (grupo SIU-LNG: artéria uterina direita de 2.38±0.72 para 2.76±0.99 (média ±SD) e artéria uterina esquerda 2.46±0.70 para 2.87±0.96, e grupo GnRHa: artéria uterina direita 2.04±0.59 para 3.12±0.98 eartéria uterina esquerda 2.24±0.59 para 3.15±0.89). Em relação ao IR das artérias uterinas, observamos incremento no grupo GnRHa em ambas artérias e somente na artéria uterina esquerda no grupo SIU-LNG (grupoSIU-LNG - artéria uterina direita de 0.85±0.08 para 0.88±0.07 e artéria uterina esquerda de 0.86±0.07 para 0.89±0.06, e grupo GnRHa: artéria uterina direita de 0.81±0.07 para 0.93±0.09 e artéria uterina esquerda 0.84±0.06 para 0.93±0.09). No entanto, ao compararmos as diferenças, a elevação foi significativamente maior nas usuárias do GnRHa. Conclusões: Ambos GnRHa e SIU-LNG promoveram redução na espessura endometrial e aumento no IP das artérias uterinas. Houve redução do volume uterino nas usuárias do grupo GnRHa, não se alterando no grupo SIU-LNG. Em relação ao IR, houve incremento em ambas as artérias nas usuárias de GnRHa e somente na artéria uterina esquerda nas usuárias do SIU-LNG. / Objectives:The objective of the present study was to compare the uterine arteries pulsatility index (PI) and resistence index (IR), uterine volume and endometrial thickness changes promoted by the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa)in patients with endometriosis. Methods: Seventy nine women aged 18 to 40 years were included in this randomized controlled trial. Eighteen was excluded based on the exclusion criteria. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups: 31 women who used the LNG-IUD (since one became pregnant before insertion and wasexcluded) and 30 who used monthly GnRHa injections. They were submitted to a transvaginal two dimensional ultrasound scan on the day the treatment started and 6 months later, for the evaluation of uterine arteries PI, uterine arteries RI, uterine volume and endometrial thickness. Results: The use of LNG-IUD promoted an ndometrial thickness decrease (6.08±3.00mm to 2.7±0.98mm; mean±SD) as does the use of GnRHa (6.96±3.82mm to 3.23±2.32mm). The uterine volume decreased in the GnRHa group (86.67±28.38cm3to 55.27±25.52cm3), but not in the LNG-IUD group (75.77±20.88cm3 to 75.97±26.62cm3). Uterine arteries PI increased in both groups : Uterine arteries PI: LNG-IUD right uterine arterie 2.38 ± 0.72 to 2.76 ± 0.99 and left uterine arterie 2.46 ± 0.70 to 2.87 ± 0.96, and GnRHa right uterine arterie 2.04 ± 0.59 to 3.12 ± 0.98 and left uterine arterie 2.24±0.59 to 3.15 ± 0.89. Uterine arteries RI increased in both arteries in GnRHa and only in the left uterine arterie in the LNG-IUD :Uterine arteries RI : LNG-IUD right uterine arterie 0.85 ± 0..08 to 0.88 ± 0.07 and left uterine arterie 0.86 ± 0.07 to 0.89 ± 0.06, and GnRHa right uterine arterie 0.81 ± 0.07 to 0.93 ± 0.09 and left uterine arterie 0.84 ± 0.06 to 0.93 ± 0.09 . However, the increase was significant higher in the GnRHa group. Conclusions: Both GnRHa and LNG-IUD promoted an endometrial thickness decrease and an increase in the uterine arteries PI. The uterine volume decreased in women who used GnRHa, but not in those who used LNG-IUD.

Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os índices de Pulsatilidade (IP) e Resistência (IR) das artérias uterinas, o volume uterino e a espessura endometrial após o uso do Sistema Intra-uterino de Levonorgestrel (SIU-LNG) ou do agonista do GnRHa (GnRHa) em pacientes portadoras de endometriose pélvica. Pacientes e métodos: Setenta e nove mulheres voluntárias, com idade entre 18 e 40 anos, foram incluídas neste ensaio clínico comparativo, prospectivo, randomizado e controlado. Dezoito foram eliminadas do estudo baseadas nos critérios de exclusão, As 61 pacientes remanescentes foram divididas em dois grupos: 31 pacientes fizeram parte do grupo SIU-LNG (uma foi excluída antes da inserção por apresentar-se grávida) e 30 fizeram parte do grupo GnRHa. Foram submetidasa exame ultra-sonográfico transvaginal bidimensional no dia em que iniciaram o tratamento (inserção do SIU-LNG ou administração de uma ampola de 3,75 mg de GnRHa por via intra-muscular) e seis meses após, avaliando a espessura endometrial, o volume uterino e os IR e IP das artérias uterinas. Resultados: Ambos tratamentos promoveram redução da espessura endometrial (6.08±3.00mm para 2.70±0.98mm e 6.96±3.82mm para 3.23±2.32mm - média ±SD, grupo SIU-LNG e grupo GnRHa, respectivamente). O volume uterino teve redução no grupo usuário do GnRHa (86.67±28.38cm3 para 55.27±25.52cm3) sem alteração significativa nas usuárias do SIU-LNG (75.77±20.88cm3 para 75.97±26.62cm3). Em relação à ascularização uterina, notamos incremento dos IP das artérias uterinas em ambos os grupos (grupo SIU-LNG: artéria uterina direita de 2.38±0.72 para 2.76±0.99 (média ±SD) e artéria uterina esquerda 2.46±0.70 para 2.87±0.96, e grupo GnRHa: artéria uterina direita 2.04±0.59 para 3.12±0.98 eartéria uterina esquerda 2.24±0.59 para 3.15±0.89). Em relação ao IR das artérias uterinas, observamos incremento no grupo GnRHa em ambas artérias e somente na artéria uterina esquerda no grupo SIU-LNG (grupoSIU-LNG - artéria uterina direita de 0.85±0.08 para 0.88±0.07 e artéria uterina esquerda de 0.86±0.07 para 0.89±0.06, e grupo GnRHa: artéria uterina direita de 0.81±0.07 para 0.93±0.09 e artéria uterina esquerda 0.84±0.06 para 0.93±0.09). No entanto, ao compararmos as diferenças, a elevação foi significativamente maior nas usuárias do GnRHa. Conclusões: Ambos GnRHa e SIU-LNG promoveram redução na espessura endometrial e aumento no IP das artérias uterinas. Houve redução do volume uterino nas usuárias do grupo GnRHa, não se alterando no grupo SIU-LNG. Em relação ao IR, houve incremento em ambas as artérias nas usuárias de GnRHa e somente na artéria uterina esquerda nas usuárias do SIU-LNG. / Objectives:The objective of the present study was to compare the uterine arteries pulsatility index (PI) and resistence index (IR), uterine volume and endometrial thickness changes promoted by the use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa)in patients with endometriosis. Methods: Seventy nine women aged 18 to 40 years were included in this randomized controlled trial. Eighteen was excluded based on the exclusion criteria. The patients were randomly allocated in two groups: 31 women who used the LNG-IUD (since one became pregnant before insertion and wasexcluded) and 30 who used monthly GnRHa injections. They were submitted to a transvaginal two dimensional ultrasound scan on the day the treatment started and 6 months later, for the evaluation of uterine arteries PI, uterine arteries RI, uterine volume and endometrial thickness. Results: The use of LNG-IUD promoted an ndometrial thickness decrease (6.08±3.00mm to 2.7±0.98mm; mean±SD) as does the use of GnRHa (6.96±3.82mm to 3.23±2.32mm). The uterine volume decreased in the GnRHa group (86.67±28.38cm3to 55.27±25.52cm3), but not in the LNG-IUD group (75.77±20.88cm3 to 75.97±26.62cm3). Uterine arteries PI increased in both groups : Uterine arteries PI: LNG-IUD right uterine arterie 2.38 ± 0.72 to 2.76 ± 0.99 and left uterine arterie 2.46 ± 0.70 to 2.87 ± 0.96, and GnRHa right uterine arterie 2.04 ± 0.59 to 3.12 ± 0.98 and left uterine arterie 2.24±0.59 to 3.15 ± 0.89. Uterine arteries RI increased in both arteries in GnRHa and only in the left uterine arterie in the LNG-IUD :Uterine arteries RI : LNG-IUD right uterine arterie 0.85 ± 0..08 to 0.88 ± 0.07 and left uterine arterie 0.86 ± 0.07 to 0.89 ± 0.06, and GnRHa right uterine arterie 0.81 ± 0.07 to 0.93 ± 0.09 and left uterine arterie 0.84 ± 0.06 to 0.93 ± 0.09 . However, the increase was significant higher in the GnRHa group. Conclusions: Both GnRHa and LNG-IUD promoted an endometrial thickness decrease and an increase in the uterine arteries PI. The uterine volume decreased in women who used GnRHa, but not in those who used LNG-IUD.