81 |
Matters of Judgement: Concepts of evidence among teachers of medicine and public healthRychetnik, Lucie January 2001 (has links)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / Introduction The aim of this study was to examine how the term “evidence” was conceived and used among academics and practitioners who teach medicine and public health. The rationale for the study was the widespread debate in the 1990s about evidence in health care. Methods Qualitative data were collected between 1996 to 1999. The core data came from unstructured interviews with researchers and practitioners linked to the Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney. Other sources of data were: participant observation of group interactions in the Faculty of Medicine and at national and international conferences about evidence in health care; discourse in health care literature; and Internet posting to an international “evidence-based health” Email discussion list. The Grounded Theory method was adopted to analyse and interpret these data. The process involved systematic coding of the data to develop conceptual categories. These categories were employed to formulate propositions about the topic of evidence and how it was conceived and used by the study participants. Results Researchers and practitioners often discussed evidence from a “realist” view: that is they valued scientifically derived and rigorously substantiated knowledge about the natural world. Yet despite their widely shared epistemological perspectives, study participants presented several diverse concepts of evidence. Their ideas were also dynamic and evolving, and often influenced by the developing (local and international) debates and controversies about evidence-based medicine (EBM). Grounded Theory analysis leads to the selection of a core “social process”. This is a core conceptual category that draws together the ideas observed in the data, and that is adopted to present the study findings. In this study, “judgement” was identified as the core social process to underpin all examined reflections and discussions about evidence. Study participants defined the concept of evidence through a combination of description and appraisal. Evidence was described in three ways, i.e.: as a “measure of reality”, by its “functional role”, or as a “constructed product”. Evidence was also appraised on three “dimensions”, i.e.: “benchmarked”, “applied” and “social” dimensions of evidence. Participants invoked these concepts of evidence differently when forming their own judgements about medical or public health knowledge; when making decisions about clinical practice; and when using argument and persuasion to influence the judgements of others. Many researchers and practitioners also modified their judgements on evidence in the light of EBM. This was based on perceptions that EBM had become a dominant rhetoric within health care, which had the potential to channel the flow of resources. This led to an increasing consideration of the “social dimension” of evidence, and of the social construction and possible “misuse” of the term evidence. Conclusions The concept of evidence is presented in this study as a multi-dimensional construct. I have proposed that the three descriptions and three dimensions of evidence presented in this study, and recognition of the way these may be invoked when forming and influencing judgments, can be used as a basis for communicating about evidence in medicine and public health among colleagues and with students. There are significant gaps in knowledge (based on empirical research) about the social dimension of evidence. Particularly, in situations where researchers and practitioners wish to employ the concept of evidence to influence others’ medical and public health practice and wider social policy.
|
82 |
Die Legitimität von Personalabteilungen eine Rekonstruktion aus Sicht der UnternehmensleitungBrandl, Julia January 2004 (has links)
Zugl.: Wien, Wirtschaftsuniv., Diss., 2004
|
83 |
Demenzkranke in speziellen Wohneinheiten : eine empirisch-qualitative Studie zum (re)-aktiven Alltag /Echer, Nikolaus Dominik. January 2006 (has links)
Zugl.: Linz, University, Diplomarbeit, 2006.
|
84 |
Dokumentieren im Heimalltag Übergabejournale im Blick ; eine Grounded-theory-StudieDuscha, Annemarie January 2006 (has links)
Zugl.: Mainz, Univ., Diplomarbeit, 2006
|
85 |
Matters of judgement concepts of evidence among teachers of medicine and public health /Rychetnik, Lucie. January 2001 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Sydney, 2001. / Title from title screen (viewed 9 January 2008). Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine. Includes bibliographical references. Also issued in print.
|
86 |
Inequities of power and privilegeBlidgen-McKinley, Bonnie Faye. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at El Paso, 2008. / Title from title screen. Vita. CD-ROM. Includes bibliographical references. Also available online.
|
87 |
Religiosität Jugendlicher eine qualitativ-empirische Untersuchung auf den Spuren korrelativer KonzeptionenProkopf, Andreas January 2006 (has links)
Zugl.: Würzburg, Univ., Diss., 2006
|
88 |
Controlling immaterieller Ressourcen im Krankenhaus Handhabung und Konsequenz von Intangibles in Einrichtungen des stationären GesundheitswesensTreml, Martin Kurt January 2008 (has links)
Zugl.: Wien, Wirtschaftsuniv., Diss., 2008
|
89 |
Application Of Grounded Theory For Concept Analysis In New Product Development Processes/Şen, Alper. Özcan, A.Can. January 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Master)--İzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir, 2006. / Analysis, analysis of variance, grounded theory. Includes bibliographical references (leaves. 63-65).
|
90 |
Devīs Geschichte ein empirisch-qualitatives Forschungsprojekt zum Phänomen der Göttin im HinduismusLuber, Markus January 2005 (has links)
Zugl.: Rom, Pontificia Univ. Gregoriana, Diss., 2005
|
Page generated in 0.2497 seconds