Phenotypic plasticity in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) can be driven by a trade-off for ecological specialisation to littoral and pelagic resources. Previous studies on perch have found that this specialisation can have different effects on linkage between the littoral and pelagic food web depending on water transparency. In this study I aimed to answer how foraging efficiency and prey preference of phenotypic divergent perch are affected by high and low water transparency, and the presence of a predator in a series of aquarium experiments. Two different phenotypes of perch were kept in littoral and pelagic environments in the lab. By presenting perch with Daphnia sp. and Ephemeroptera, either separately or combined. I found that in clear water the littoral and pelagic phenotypes were comparatively more efficient on resources that were representative of their habitats (Ephemeroptera and Daphnia, respectively) and that both phenotypes prefer Ephemeroptera over Daphnia. In low visibility the differences in foraging efficiency between phenotypes when feeding on Daphnia disappeared but remained similar to clear water when feeding on Ephemeroptera. When vision was constrained littoral and pelagic perch showed no sign of prey preferences. In the presence of a predator the difference in foraging efficiency between the phenotypes, and also prey preference disappeared. I found that littoral phenotypes interacted more with other group members than did pelagic phenotypes, when foraging on littoral prey. And for perch in general, when foraging for Daphnia the interaction among group members was markedly reduced compared to when foraging for Ephemeroptera. In this study I show that morphological adaptation and prey choice is affected by visibility and predation. I also give suggestions how and argue why this can affect linkage of food webs and the community composition in littoral and pelagic habitats.

Cross-boundary movements of energy and material are ubiquitous. Freshwater ecosystems receive nutrients, dissolved, and particulate organic matter from adjacent terrestrial ecosystems, whereas terrestrial ecosystems mainly receive prey organisms and detritus deposited by physical processes such as floods from freshwater ecosystems. Within lakes, fish are considered as integrators between habitats due to their high mobility, although they often occupy either near-shore littoral or open-water pelagic habitats and develop habitat-specific morphologies. Such intra-population divergence in morphological traits might limit the use of multiple habitats. In this thesis, I first focused on quantity and quality of reciprocal fluxes of particulate organic matter between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems and responses of recipient consumers. Freshwater ecosystems generally received higher amounts of externally-produced resources than terrestrial ecosystems. Despite this discrepancy, aquatic and terrestrial consumer responses were similar, likely due to the differences in resource quality. Second, I investigated the potential of particulate organic carbon (POC) supporting benthic food webs in lakes; a pathway that has largely been neglected in previous studies. I found that POC can substantially subsidize the benthic food web and that the effects on the benthic food web were transferred to the pelagic habitat, thus emphasizing the importance of benthic pathways for pelagic production. Third, I examined how water transparency can affect intra-population divergence in perch (Perca fluviatilis). I observed that increased water transparency can considerably increase morphological divergence between littoral and pelagic populations likely due to its effects on foraging. Finally, I investigated the effects of such intra-population divergence on littoral-pelagic food web coupling. I found that low morphological divergence corresponded with high overlap in resource use, whereas strong morphological divergence resulted in low overlap in resource use. Here littoral populations mainly utilized littoral resources and pelagic populations primarily utilized pelagic resources, indicating that habitat coupling might be strongly limited when intra-population divergence is high. In conclusion, although different ecosystems seem separated by distinct physical boundaries, these boundaries are often crossed. However, the development of habitat-specific adaptive traits might limit movement between apparently contiguous habitats.