Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 47-06, page: 3556. Adviser: T. Robert Harris. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1996. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [85]-91).

A 13-year-old girl presented in mild distress with moderate to severe erythema and cracking to the dorsal aspects of both hands. She reported associated pruritus and pain.

<p>Syftet med denna litteraturstudie var att beskriva varför följsamheten gällande handhygien ofta är låg bland vårdpersonal, samt hur man kan öka följsamheten för handhygien bland vårdpersonal. Metoden som använts var en litteraturstudie. Datainsamling skedde via databaserna Medline (PubMed), Cinahl (EBSCO host) och Academic Search Elite. Sökorden som använts: prevention, hand disinfection, hand washing, infection control, nosocomial infection och education. Totalt användes 15 vetenskapliga artiklar. Resultatet delades in i två huvudrubriker: Orsaker till att följsamheten ofta är låg bland vårdpersonal och faktorer som kan öka följsamheten gällande handhygien bland vårdpersonal. De två huvudrubrikerna delades in i sex underrubriker: tidsbrist, hudbekymmer, kunskapsbrist, utbildning, affisch/posters och tillgänglighet. Resultatet visade att det finns många anledningar till att följsamheten för handhygien är låg. Studien visar att tidsbrist, hudbekymmer samt kunskapsbrist gällande hand hygien är de vanligaste orsakerna. Utbildning tillsammans med affischer/posters samt ökad tillgänglighet vad gäller material har visat sig vara det mest effektiva sättet att öka följsamheten av handhygien.</p><p><strong><p>Nyckelord</p><p>.</p>: prevention, hand disinfection, hand washing, infection control, nosocomial infection och education. </strong></p>

Syftet med denna litteraturstudie var att beskriva varför följsamheten gällande handhygien ofta är låg bland vårdpersonal, samt hur man kan öka följsamheten för handhygien bland vårdpersonal. Metoden som använts var en litteraturstudie. Datainsamling skedde via databaserna Medline (PubMed), Cinahl (EBSCO host) och Academic Search Elite. Sökorden som använts: prevention, hand disinfection, hand washing, infection control, nosocomial infection och education. Totalt användes 15 vetenskapliga artiklar. Resultatet delades in i två huvudrubriker: Orsaker till att följsamheten ofta är låg bland vårdpersonal och faktorer som kan öka följsamheten gällande handhygien bland vårdpersonal. De två huvudrubrikerna delades in i sex underrubriker: tidsbrist, hudbekymmer, kunskapsbrist, utbildning, affisch/posters och tillgänglighet. Resultatet visade att det finns många anledningar till att följsamheten för handhygien är låg. Studien visar att tidsbrist, hudbekymmer samt kunskapsbrist gällande hand hygien är de vanligaste orsakerna. Utbildning tillsammans med affischer/posters samt ökad tillgänglighet vad gäller material har visat sig vara det mest effektiva sättet att öka följsamheten av handhygien. Nyckelord . : prevention, hand disinfection, hand washing, infection control, nosocomial infection och education.

FACT Around 2.6 billion people worldwide lack access to adequate sanitation and hygiene.  WHY SHOULD WE CARE? Hand washing with soap shows the greatest reduction in diarrhea morbidity (over 40%), and can also reduce respiratory tract infection by about one third.  WHAT ARE WE WAITING FOR? Despite the cost effectiveness of hand washing with soap, and the fact that it is a relatively simple behavior, encouraging good hand washing practice remains a challenge. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE? This project aims to spread hand hygiene in rural Kenyan households by engaging local manufacturers. In this project, World Bank’s Water and Sanitation Program (WSP) supported preliminary consumer research and product design work for a new affordable hand washing station.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1981. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 45-49).

Handwashing is a well known practice to prevent the hospital-acquired infections, and it is also a basic procedure of the nosocomial infection control programs. This research is conducted to use PRECEDE model to investigate the factors affecting nurses¡¦ performance in handwashing practices. We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate 212 nurses working patients` heaithcare from a medical center of north Taiwan, and a quota sampling method was used to analyze nurses¡¦ handwashing practices. The results of this research includes (1) the major causes affect nursing staffs¡¦ performance in handwashing practices include attitudes (enthusiastic and passive), encouragements from colleagues, and feedback of the nosocomial infection rate or density. (2) different perfessional department and different ward type also affect the performance of nurses¡¦ handwashing practices. (3) nurses washed their hands often after contacting patients¡¦ body substances, and they usually forget to wash their hands after checking patients¡¦ medicine charts. (4) seif-reported factors for poor adherence with handwashing are heavy work loading and taking patients¡¦ needs priority. The suggestions of this research are (1) providing nurses the routine feedback information regarding the changes in nosocomial infection rate versus their performance in handwashing practices. (2) making nursing supervisors and their colleagues to understand the importance of handwashing practice as well as encouragement, reminding, and supporting. (3) the above two suggestions should be executed continually. From the positive feedback, it shall enhance nursing staffs` attitudes to improve their handwashing practices, and then, nursing staffs will be willing to keep excellent performance in handwashing practices.

Master of Public Health / Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology / Katherine S. KuKanich / Hand hygiene by healthcare workers is an effective means of preventing healthcare-acquired infections. However, hand hygiene compliance can be low among healthcare workers. This study used introduction of a gel sanitizer and informational poster as interventional tools in attempt to improve hand hygiene in two outpatient healthcare clinics. Healthcare workers at two outpatient clinics were observed for frequency of hand hygiene (attempts vs. opportunities). Gel sanitizer and informational posters were introduced together as an intervention. Direct observation of hand hygiene frequency was performed during baseline, intervention, and follow-up. A post-study survey of healthcare workers was collected. In both clinics, baseline hand hygiene was poor (11% and 21%) but significantly improved (p[less than or equal to]0.0001) after interventions (36 and 54%), and was maintained (p>0.05) through the follow-up period (32 and 51%). Throughout the study, post-contact hygiene was statistically observed more than pre-contact hygiene. In both clinics, healthcare workers self-reported a preference for soap and water, yet observations showed that sanitizer use predominated over soap and water use when sanitizer was available after the intervention. Fifty per cent of the surveyed healthcare workers considered the introduction of gel sanitizer to be an effective motivating tool for improving hand hygiene. Hand hygiene performance by healthcare workers in outpatient clinics may benefit from promoting gel sanitizer and using informational posters. Direct observation by trained observers may provide more accurate information of hand hygiene tool preference compared with survey results.

Master of Public Health / Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology / Douglas Powell / Outbreaks of human illness have been linked to visiting settings with animal contact throughout developed countries. These outbreaks demonstrate that although contact with animals in public settings can provide educational and entertainment opportunities, the potential to spread disease exists if risk-reduction tools are not implemented, proper hygiene measures aren’t practiced, and precautions are not taken and reinforced. This thesis is divided into two parts. Part one is an observational study of hand hygiene tool availability and recommendations; frequency of risky behavior; and, handwashing attempts by visitors in Kansas and Missouri, U.S., petting zoos. Part two delineates best practices for organizing events where human-animal interactions are encouraged, in hopes it will lower the risk of zoonotic disease transmission. Handwashing signs and hand hygiene stations were available at the exit of animal-contact areas in 10/13 and 8/13 petting zoos respectively. Risky behaviors were observed being performed at all petting zoos by at least one visitor. Frequently observed behaviors were: children (10/13 petting zoos) and adults (9/13 petting zoos) touching hands to face within animal-contact areas; animals licking children’s and adults’ hands (7/13 and 4/13 petting zoos, respectively); and children and adults drinking within animal-contact areas (5/13 petting zoos each). Of 574 visitors observed for hand hygiene when exiting animal-contact areas, 37% (n=214) of individuals attempted some type of hand hygiene, with male adults, female adults, and children attempting at similar rates (32%, 40%, and 37% respectively). Visitors performed hand hygiene more often when a staff member was present within or at the exit to the animal-contact area (136/231, 59%) than when no staff member was present (78/343, 23%; P < 0.001, OR = 4.863, 95% CI = 3.380–6.998), and in petting zoos where animal contact occurred over a fence (188/460, 40.9%) as opposed to visitors entering an animals’ yard for contact (26/114, 22.8%; P < 0.001, OR = 2.339, 95% CI = 1.454–3.763). Inconsistencies existed in tool availability, signage, and supervision of animal- contact. Risk communication was poor, with few petting zoos outlining risks associated with animal-contact, or providing recommendations for precautions to be taken to reduce these risks. Recommendations made in the second part of this thesis were based on these observations, recent publications, and the suggestions of many health agencies. It focuses on what event planners can do to design and plan a safer event, and what staff working at the event should be aware of in order to inform visitors and lower the risk of zoonotic disease transmission. Part two discusses two primary tools to reduce risk of zoonotic disease transmission: sanitation and awareness of risk behaviors. Keeping facilities, animals, and visitors clean, and informing visitors of risky behaviors to avoid, while reinforcing positive messages within the animal- contact area, can lower the risk of zoonotic infection. Included with the second part, is a checklist (see appendix A) designed for visitors to assess whether an event that encourages human-animal interaction poses a high or low risk. By identifying possible risk factors, teachers and parents will be able to make an informed decision about the safety of the human-animal encounter.