The growing popularity of instant messaging has led to the conception of several new applications over the span of the past decade. This has opened up an attack surface for cybercriminals to target susceptible app users. GroupMe is a free IM app widely used by students and so far, no comprehensive forensic analysis has been performed to aid forensic practitioners in recovering evidence from GroupMe on smartphones. This research performs a detailed analysis of the digital artifacts left by the app on Android and iOS devices. This was achieved by installing the app on two mobile phones (Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge and iPhone 6), and identifying each artifact created by performing a series of actions in the app ranging from sending texts, to sharing images and documents, along with their location. Using Cellebrite UFED and Magnet AXIOM, a significant number of artifacts were accurately recovered mainly from the “GroupMe.sqlite” and “GroupMe.sqlite-wal” databases. Out of the 335 artifacts populated on the iPhone, 317 were correctly recovered by both UFED and AXIOM, resulting in an accuracy of 94.62%. No GroupMe related artifacts could be recovered from the Android device. This was due to several physical imaging and rooting limitations imposed by the Samsung SM-935A model, which was used during the study.

<div>With the increased evolution in technology over the past decade, there has been a gradual inclination towards utilizing advanced tools, like location-based applications which incorporate features such as constant route or traffic updates with Global Positioning System (GPS), among</div><div>others, which aid in smooth living. Such applications gain access to private information of users, among their other life hack qualities, thus producing a highly vulnerable ground for data exposure such as current location. With the increase in mobile application-based attacks, there exists a</div><div>constant threat scenario in terms of criminal activities which pose an ultimate challenge while tackling large amount of data. This research primarily focuses on the extent of user-specific data that can be obtained while forensically collecting and analysing data from Waze and HEREwego</div><div>applications on Android and iOS platforms. In order to address the lack of forensic research on the above mentioned applications, an in-depth forensic analysis is conducted in this study, utilizing Cellebrite, a professional tool to provide and verify the evidence acquired, that aid in any digital forensic investigations. On the Waze application, 12 artifacts were populated on the Android device and 17 artifacts on the iOS device, out of which 12 artifacts were recovered from the Android device (100% of the artifacts populated) and 12 artifacts from the iOS device (70.58% of the artifacts populated). Similarly on the HEREwego application, 14 artifacts were populated on the Android device and 13 artifacts on the iOS device, out of which 7 artifacts were recovered from the Android device (50% of the artifacts populated) and 7 artifacts from iOS device (53.84% of the artifacts populated).</div>

<p>Technological advances have a profound impact on people and the world in which they live. People use a wide range of smart devices, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), smartphones, and wearable devices, on a regular basis, all of which store and use location data. With this explosion of technology, these devices have been playing an essential role in digital forensics and crime investigations. Digital forensic professionals have become more able to acquire and assess various types of data and locations; therefore, location data has become essential for responders, practitioners, and digital investigators dealing with digital forensic cases that rely heavily on digital devices that collect data about their users. It is very beneficial and critical when performing any digital/cyber forensic investigation to consider answering the six Ws questions (i.e., who, what, when, where, why, and how) by using location data recovered from digital devices, such as where the suspect was at the time of the crime or the deviant act. Therefore, they could convict a suspect or help prove their innocence. However, many digital forensic standards, guidelines, tools, and even the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cyber Security Personnel Framework (NICE) lack full coverage of what location data can be, how to use such data effectively, and how to perform spatial analysis. Although current digital forensic frameworks recognize the importance of location data, only a limited number of data sources (e.g., GPS) are considered sources of location in these digital forensic frameworks. Moreover, most digital forensic frameworks and tools have yet to introduce geo-contextualization techniques and spatial analysis into the digital forensic process, which may aid digital forensic investigations and provide more information for decision-making. As a result, significant gaps in the digital forensics community are still influenced by a lack of understanding of how to properly curate geodata. Therefore, this research was conducted to develop a transdisciplinary framework to deal with the limitations of previous work and explore opportunities to deal with geodata recovered from digital evidence by improving the way of maintaining geodata and getting the best value from them using an iPhone case study. The findings of this study demonstrated the potential value of geodata in digital disciplinary investigations when using the created transdisciplinary framework. Moreover, the findings discuss the implications for digital spatial analytical techniques and multi-intelligence domains, including location intelligence and open-source intelligence, that aid investigators and generate an exceptional understanding of device users' spatial, temporal, and spatial-temporal patterns.</p>