Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-04-27T23:37:26Z No. of bitstreams: 1 AlyereSilvaFarias_TESE.pdf: 3393204 bytes, checksum: 027912313dd6c428bcf3fa81bd723aa9 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-04-27T23:49:53Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 AlyereSilvaFarias_TESE.pdf: 3393204 bytes, checksum: 027912313dd6c428bcf3fa81bd723aa9 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-27T23:49:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AlyereSilvaFarias_TESE.pdf: 3393204 bytes, checksum: 027912313dd6c428bcf3fa81bd723aa9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-04 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior (CAPES) / Este trabalho buscou analisar as metamorfoses na narrativa ?Meu tio o Iauaret??, de Jo?o Guimar?es Rosa, com o objetivo de investigar a instabilidade da transforma??o e seus efeitos, tanto no texto, quanto no discurso dos personagens. Publicada em 1961, na revista Senhor, a narrativa foi reescrita por Jo?o Guimar?es Rosa, e a nova vers?o do texto passou a fazer parte da colet?nea p?stuma Estas Est?rias em 1969. A primeira metamorfose analisada ocorre nas palavras que comp?em esse texto. Para analisar as transforma??es de ordem linguageira e discursiva, utilizamos como m?todo a Compara??o Diferencial (HEIDMANN, 2003, 2010, 2012) para averiguar as altera??es propostas em rascunho por Guimar?es Rosa, antes de sua morte, que foram adotadas para a edi??o do livro. A segunda transforma??o se d? com o personagem principal da narrativa, que se apresenta como homem e on?a a um homem perdido que chega ? sua casa no meio do sert?o. Com o objetivo de analisar a perspectiva do ser em transforma??o e do seu interlocutor a respeito da metamorfose, evocamos aspectos filos?ficos distintos: utilizamos o levantamento hist?rico-filos?fico sobre o homem, feito pelo fil?sofo neokantiano Ernst Cassirer (2012), para refletir sobre o personagem interlocutor, que se define como homem; tecemos aproxima??es com o Dasein heideggeriano (2008) e conceitos como impessoalidade e fala??o (HEIDEGGER, 2003, 2010, 2013), para analisar o processo de metamorfose experimentado pelo personagem principal. Buscamos refletir tamb?m sobre a sua compreens?o de si, como ser em metamorfose, aproximando o percurso do personagem principal do processo de constru??o do Corpo sem ?rg?os (DELEUZE e GUATTARI, 1997b). Para realizar um estudo comparativo diferencial entre duas realiza??es da mesma narrativa, precisamos construir nossos compar?veis a partir da rela??o entre a narrativa rosiana e obras que tamb?m apresentam personagens que se metamorfoseiam. Selecionamos quatro textos para dialogar com a narrativa rosiana: o epis?dio de Aracne e Minerva, de Ov?dio (MET VI 1-145), a novela kafkiana A metamorfose (KAFKA, 1986), o folheto A mo?a que virou cadela, de Antonio Lucena (2004) e o epis?dio ?Red-Handed? (2011) da s?rie para televis?o Once upon a time, de Edward Kitsis e Adam Horowitz. A escolha de narrativas que se inserem em contextos diferentes evidencia o car?ter n?o-hier?rquico da Compara??o Diferencial e possibilita a reflex?o sobre os seres em transforma??o a partir dos tra?os contextuais identificados no discurso dos personagens metamorfoseados. O estudo da narrativa ?Meu tio o Iauaret?? ressalta a perspectiva de que a transforma??o f?sica do personagem n?o estabelece, por si s?, o abandono do modo impessoal, e nem sempre dissolve as fronteiras entre as esp?cies. A metamorfose rosiana, ? inst?vel, apresenta um personagem que n?o ?sofre? uma transforma??o, mas a desfruta conscientemente e consegue apagar os limites estabelecidos entre homem e on?a a ponto de compor um ser que acredita poder utilizar, de maneira premeditada, o seu devir-animal (DELEUZE e GUATTARI, 2003) nos momentos de intera??o humana. Consideramos que a narrativa rosiana ultrapassa a transforma??o que ? identific?vel aos olhos do homem comum, abandona os estados definitivos e explora o estar-sendo (HEIDEGGER, 2008), sob a ?tica exclusiva do ser em metamorfose. / This study aims to analyse the metamorphosis in the narrative ?Meu tio o Iauaret?? by Jo?o Guimar?es Rosa, in order to investigate the instability of the transformation and its effects, both in the text and in the speech of the characters. It was published in 1961, in the ?Senhor? magazine and the narrative was rewritten by Jo?o Guimar?es Rosa, and the new version of the text has become part of the posthumous collection Estas Est?rias in 1969. The first analyzed metamorphosis occurs in the words that are part of these texts. To analyze the transformations of language and discursive order, the Differential Comparison (HEIDMANN, 2003, 2010, 2012) was used as method to investigate the changes proposed in draft by Guimar?es Rosa, before his death, which were adopted for the book edition. The second transformation takes place with the main character of the narrative, who appears as a man and as a jaguar to a lost man who comes to his house in the middle of the backlands. In order to analyze the prospect of the being in transformation and his interlocutor about the metamorphosis, different philosophical aspects were evoked: we used the historical-philosophical survey of the man made by neo-Kantian philosopher Ernst Cassirer (2012) to reflect on the interlocutor character, who defined himself as a man; we made approaches with Heidegger?s Dasein (2008) and concepts such as das Man and das geredete (HEIDEGGER, 2003, 2010, 2013), to analyze the process of metamorphosis experienced by the main character. In addition, we also sought to reflect on his understanding of himself as a being in metamorphosis, approaching the course of the main character to the process of building the ?corps-sans-organes? (DELEUZE and GUATTARI, 1997b). In order to carry out a differential comparative study between two achievements of the same narrative, we need to build our comparable from the relationship between the Rosa?s narrative and the literally works which also feature characters who metamorphose themselves. We selected four texts for dialogue with Rosa's narrative: the episode of Aracne and Minerva, by Ovidio (MET VI 1-145), the Kafka novel A metamorfose (KAFKA, 1986), the booklet A mo?a que virou cadela, by Antonio Lucena (2004) and the episode ?Red-Handed? (2011) from the television series Once upon a time, by Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz. The choice of narratives which fall in different contexts highlights the non-hierarchical nature of Differential Comparison and enables reflection on the changing beings from the contextual features identified in the discourse of metamorphosed characters. The study of the narrative ?Meu tio o Iauaret?? highlights the view that the physical transformation of the character does not establish, by itself, the abandonment of the impersonal way, and it does not always dissolve the boundaries between species. The Rosa's metamorphosis is unstable, it shows a character that does not undergo transformation, but enjoys it consciously and can erase the limits between the man and the jaguar as to compose a being who believes he is able to use, in an aforethought way, his devenir-animal (DELEUZE and GUATTARI, 2003) in moments of human interaction. Thus, we consider that Rosa's narrative goes beyond the transformation that is identifiable in the eyes of the common man, he abandons the definitive states and explores the Dasein (HEIDEGGER, 2008), under the unique perspective of the being in metamorphosis.