This survey is a qualitative study about how teachers see on the concept student leverage and what they say about how they in practice work with it. We have chosen to examine the subject from a teacher’s perspective, because almost all investigations and literature, that we have found, discuss student influence from a student’s perspective. That’s why we are interested to examine what teachers think of the subject. We did three focus group interviews with teachers from preschool classes up to class 6. The teachers considered that student influence is when teachers listen to the students' interests and the lesson content then acts about that. Student influence is also that the students may influence the organization of social environment, evaluation and approaches. Evaluation was something the teachers regarded should be done, but they said that they didn’t have time to do it. All teachers expressed that when they work with student influence, it is through class - and pupil ' council. They considered that the students through this might have leverage in both classroom and school. We have come to a result that student effect means that the students should have leverage in both contents and approaches. Student effect is also that the student can have influence in his/hers situation in the school.

<p>This survey is a qualitative study about how teachers see on the concept student leverage and what they say about how they in practice work with it. We have chosen to examine the subject from a teacher’s perspective, because almost all investigations and literature, that we have found, discuss student influence from a student’s perspective. That’s why we are interested to examine what teachers think of the subject. We did three focus group interviews with teachers from preschool classes up to class 6. The teachers considered that student influence is when teachers listen to the students' interests and the lesson content then acts about that. Student influence is also that the students may influence the organization of social environment, evaluation and approaches. Evaluation was something the teachers regarded should be done, but they said that they didn’t have time to do it. All teachers expressed that when they work with student influence, it is through class - and pupil ' council. They considered that the students through this might have leverage in both classroom and school. We have come to a result that student effect means that the students should have leverage in both contents and approaches. Student effect is also that the student can have influence in his/hers situation in the school.</p>

<p>Агротуризам&nbsp; редставља&nbsp; осебни,&nbsp; селективни&nbsp; вид&nbsp; туризма&nbsp; који&nbsp; обједињује&nbsp; скуп&nbsp; активности&nbsp; на&nbsp;сеоским&nbsp; туристичким&nbsp; домаћинствима&nbsp; и&nbsp; у&nbsp; објектима&nbsp; у&nbsp; домаћој&nbsp; радиности.&nbsp; У&nbsp; раду&nbsp; је&nbsp; дат &nbsp;преглед&nbsp; владајуће&nbsp;литературе&nbsp; о&nbsp; агротуризму&nbsp; у AП&nbsp; Војводини (Србији)&nbsp; и&nbsp; иностраним&nbsp; државама&nbsp; и&nbsp; дефинисане&nbsp; су&nbsp; основне&nbsp; карактеристике&nbsp; овог&nbsp; вида&nbsp; туризма.&nbsp; Приказане&nbsp; су&nbsp; туристичко-географске&nbsp; карактеристике&nbsp; истраживаног&nbsp;ростора,&nbsp; описана&nbsp; је&nbsp; студија&nbsp; случаја&nbsp; стања&nbsp; и&nbsp; развоја&nbsp; агротуризма&nbsp; у&nbsp; Војводини&nbsp; и&nbsp; упоређена&nbsp; са&nbsp; осталим&nbsp;деловима&nbsp; Србије&nbsp; и&nbsp; са &nbsp;примерима&nbsp; из&nbsp; иностранства.&nbsp; У&nbsp; методолошком&nbsp; делу &nbsp;приказани&nbsp; су&nbsp; инструменти, процедура&nbsp; и&nbsp; узорак&nbsp; истраживања,&nbsp; а&nbsp; остављене&nbsp; су&nbsp; и&nbsp; хипотезе&nbsp; рада.&nbsp; Кроз &nbsp;резултате&nbsp; и&nbsp; дискусију,&nbsp; хипотезе&nbsp;су &nbsp;потврђене,&nbsp; делимично &nbsp;потврђене&nbsp; или&nbsp; оповргнуте,&nbsp; уз &nbsp;помоћ&nbsp; статистичких &nbsp;прорачуна&nbsp; и&nbsp; других&nbsp; метода провере,&nbsp; док&nbsp; су&nbsp; у&nbsp; закључку&nbsp; рада &nbsp;представљени&nbsp; научни&nbsp; и &nbsp;практични&nbsp; допринос&nbsp; теоријског&nbsp; и &nbsp; теренског&nbsp;истраживања,&nbsp; као&nbsp; и&nbsp; ограничења&nbsp; истраживања.&nbsp; У&nbsp; овом&nbsp; сегменту&nbsp; наведени&nbsp; су&nbsp; и&nbsp; основни &nbsp;проблеми&nbsp;администрације, &nbsp;праксе&nbsp; и&nbsp; теорије&nbsp; о &nbsp;аспектима&nbsp; квалитета&nbsp; агротуризма&nbsp; у&nbsp; Војводини.&nbsp; Такође,&nbsp; изложене&nbsp; су&nbsp;идеје&nbsp; и &nbsp;предлози&nbsp; за&nbsp; будућа&nbsp; истраживања&nbsp; и &nbsp;практични&nbsp; савети&nbsp; који&nbsp; имају&nbsp; за&nbsp; циљ&nbsp; да&nbsp; сугеришу&nbsp; и&nbsp; мотивишу&nbsp;окретање &nbsp;промена&nbsp; које&nbsp; могу&nbsp; довести&nbsp; до &nbsp;побољшања&nbsp; квалитeта&nbsp; агротуристичке &nbsp;понуде&nbsp; у&nbsp; Војводини&nbsp; и&nbsp;читавој Србији.</p> / <p>Agroturizam&nbsp; redstavlja&nbsp; osebni,&nbsp; selektivni&nbsp; vid&nbsp; turizma&nbsp; koji&nbsp; objedinjuje&nbsp; skup&nbsp; aktivnosti&nbsp; na&nbsp;seoskim&nbsp; turističkim&nbsp; domaćinstvima&nbsp; i&nbsp; u&nbsp; objektima&nbsp; u&nbsp; domaćoj&nbsp; radinosti.&nbsp; U&nbsp; radu&nbsp; je&nbsp; dat &nbsp;pregled&nbsp; vladajuće&nbsp;literature&nbsp; o&nbsp; agroturizmu&nbsp; u AP&nbsp; Vojvodini (Srbiji)&nbsp; i&nbsp; inostranim&nbsp; državama&nbsp; i&nbsp; definisane&nbsp; su&nbsp; osnovne&nbsp; karakteristike&nbsp; ovog&nbsp; vida&nbsp; turizma.&nbsp; Prikazane&nbsp; su&nbsp; turističko-geografske&nbsp; karakteristike&nbsp; istraživanog&nbsp;rostora,&nbsp; opisana&nbsp; je&nbsp; studija&nbsp; slučaja&nbsp; stanja&nbsp; i&nbsp; razvoja&nbsp; agroturizma&nbsp; u&nbsp; Vojvodini&nbsp; i&nbsp; upoređena&nbsp; sa&nbsp; ostalim&nbsp;delovima&nbsp; Srbije&nbsp; i&nbsp; sa &nbsp;primerima&nbsp; iz&nbsp; inostranstva.&nbsp; U&nbsp; metodološkom&nbsp; delu &nbsp;prikazani&nbsp; su&nbsp; instrumenti, procedura&nbsp; i&nbsp; uzorak&nbsp; istraživanja,&nbsp; a&nbsp; ostavljene&nbsp; su&nbsp; i&nbsp; hipoteze&nbsp; rada.&nbsp; Kroz &nbsp;rezultate&nbsp; i&nbsp; diskusiju,&nbsp; hipoteze&nbsp;su &nbsp;potvrđene,&nbsp; delimično &nbsp;potvrđene&nbsp; ili&nbsp; opovrgnute,&nbsp; uz &nbsp;pomoć&nbsp; statističkih &nbsp;proračuna&nbsp; i&nbsp; drugih&nbsp; metoda provere,&nbsp; dok&nbsp; su&nbsp; u&nbsp; zaključku&nbsp; rada &nbsp;predstavljeni&nbsp; naučni&nbsp; i &nbsp;praktični&nbsp; doprinos&nbsp; teorijskog&nbsp; i &nbsp; terenskog&nbsp;istraživanja,&nbsp; kao&nbsp; i&nbsp; ograničenja&nbsp; istraživanja.&nbsp; U&nbsp; ovom&nbsp; segmentu&nbsp; navedeni&nbsp; su&nbsp; i&nbsp; osnovni &nbsp;problemi&nbsp;administracije, &nbsp;prakse&nbsp; i&nbsp; teorije&nbsp; o &nbsp;aspektima&nbsp; kvaliteta&nbsp; agroturizma&nbsp; u&nbsp; Vojvodini.&nbsp; Takođe,&nbsp; izložene&nbsp; su&nbsp;ideje&nbsp; i &nbsp;predlozi&nbsp; za&nbsp; buduća&nbsp; istraživanja&nbsp; i &nbsp;praktični&nbsp; saveti&nbsp; koji&nbsp; imaju&nbsp; za&nbsp; cilj&nbsp; da&nbsp; sugerišu&nbsp; i&nbsp; motivišu&nbsp;okretanje &nbsp;promena&nbsp; koje&nbsp; mogu&nbsp; dovesti&nbsp; do &nbsp;poboljšanja&nbsp; kvaliteta&nbsp; agroturističke &nbsp;ponude&nbsp; u&nbsp; Vojvodini&nbsp; i&nbsp;čitavoj Srbiji.</p> / <p>Agritourism is a specific, selective type of tourism that combines a set of activities on farms and in<br />self-service&nbsp; beds&nbsp; (accomodation&nbsp; type)&nbsp; in&nbsp; rural&nbsp; areas.&nbsp; This&nbsp; paper&nbsp; presents&nbsp; a&nbsp; literature&nbsp; review&nbsp; of&nbsp; agritourism&nbsp; in<br />Vojvodina&nbsp; Province&nbsp; (Serbia)&nbsp; and&nbsp; foreign&nbsp; countries&nbsp; and&nbsp; defines&nbsp; the&nbsp; basic&nbsp; characteristics&nbsp; of&nbsp; this&nbsp; type&nbsp; of&nbsp; tourism.&nbsp; A<br />tourist-geographical&nbsp; characteristics&nbsp; of&nbsp; the&nbsp; study&nbsp; area&nbsp; are&nbsp; presented,&nbsp; the&nbsp; case&nbsp; study&nbsp; situation&nbsp; and&nbsp; development&nbsp; of<br />agritourism in Vojvodina are described and comparedwith other parts of Serbia and with examples from abroad. In the<br />methodological&nbsp; part,&nbsp; the&nbsp; tools,&nbsp; procedures,&nbsp; and&nbsp; sample&nbsp; surveys,&nbsp; together&nbsp; with&nbsp; working&nbsp; hypotheses&nbsp; are&nbsp; presented.<br />Throughout the results and discussion, the hypotheses are confirmed, partially confirmed or refuted, using statistical<br />calculations and other methods of testing. On the other hand, in the conclusion of the paper, a scientific and practical<br />contribution to the theory and field studies, as well as the limitations of the research are shown. Inthis segment of<br />paper, the main problems of administration, practices, and theories on quality&rsquo; aspects of agritourismin Vojvodina are<br />listed. Together with these, the ideas and suggestions for future research and practical advices aimedto motivate the<br />initiation of changes in the quality of agritourismin Vojvodina Province and in the Republic Serbia are expressed.</p>