Une cellule est soumise à différents stimuli internes et externes. Pour remplir ses fonctions, elle doit donc s’adapter rapidement. Cela implique une régulation fine de l’expression génique. Celle-ci s’effectue au niveau transcriptionnel, mais également au niveau traductionnel. La traduction comprend trois phases : le démarrage, l’allongement et la terminaison. C’est au cours du démarrage de la traduction que s’effectue la sélection du codon de démarrage et donc le choix du cadre de lecture de l’ARNm. D’un point de vue cinétique, le démarrage de la traduction est l’étape limitante. Ainsi, il apparait comme une cible privilégiée pour le contrôle traductionnel.Chez les archées, le démarrage de la traduction met en jeu un complexe macromoléculaire formé de la petite sous-unité du ribosome, d’un ARNm, d’un ARN de transfert initiateur méthionylé (Met-ARNtiMet) et de trois facteurs de démarrage de la traduction (aIF1, aIF1A et aIF2). De manière intéressante, ces trois facteurs de démarrage ont chacun un orthologue eucaryote.Les ARNti archées et eucaryotes possèdent une paire de bases très conservée A1-U72, au sommet de la tige acceptrice. Cette paire de base a été montrée importante pour la discrimination des ARNt initiateurs et élongateurs. De plus, des travaux suggèrent l’importance de la géométrie de la paire A1-U72 pour l’identité initiatrice de ces ARNts. Cependant, au début de ma thèse, aucune donnée structurale n’était disponible pour expliquer comment les caractéristiques de la paire A1-U72 participaient à la sélection de l’ARNt initiateur. Dans un premier temps, mon travail de thèse a consisté en la construction d’une souche bactérienne d’E.coli utilisant comme seul source d’ARNti un variant d’ARNt initiateur bactérien (ARNtfMet) possédant une paire de base A1-U72 (ARNtfMetA1-U72). L’utilisation de cette souche nous a permis d’obtenir de grandes quantités d’ARNtfMetA1-U72 purifié. De plus, la structure cristallographique de cet ARNtA1-U72 a pu être déterminée à 2.8 Å de résolution. Un arrangement inhabituel des bases A1 et U72 a été observé.Tous les acteurs du démarrage de la traduction de l’archée P. abyssi étant disponibles au laboratoire, une étude du complexe de démarrage de la traduction archée par cryo-microscopie électronique a pu être réalisée. L’étude a permis d’identifier deux conformations de l’ARNti dans le complexe de démarrage, IC0-Premote (5.3 Å de résolution) et IC1-Pin (7.5 Å de résolution). Ces deux conformations permettent de proposer un modèle pour l’accommodation de l’ARNt initiateur lors de l’appariement au codon de démarrage.Finalement, je me suis également intéressée au rôle du facteur aIF1. La disponibilité de structures 3D et de modèles d’assemblage, ainsi que les alignements des séquences aIF1 d’archées ont permis de proposer des régions ou acides aminés pouvant être impliqués dans la liaison au ribosome et/ou dans la sélection des ARNt initiateurs lors de la formation du complexe de démarrage. Afin de pouvoir étudier l’implication de ces régions ou acides aminés, j’ai mis au point une méthode d’étude de la liaison d’aIF1 à la petite sous-unité du ribosome par anisotropie de fluorescence. Cette étude met en évidence deux résidus basiques d’aIF1 impliqués dans la liaison au ribosome. D’autre part, les rôles d’aIF1 dans la sélection du codon de démarrage de la traduction et dans la stabilisation du complexe de démarrage sur l’ARNm sont étudiés par la méthode d’empreinte du ribosome ou toeprint. / A cell is subjected to different internal and external stimuli and must adapt quickly to fulfill its functions. This involves a fine regulation of gene expression. This occurs at the transcriptional level, but also at the translational level. Translation has three phases: initiation, elongation and termination. Selection of the start codon and therefore the choice of the mRNA reading frame is performed during translation initiation. From a kinetic point of view, translation initiation is the rate limiting step. Thus, it appears as a prime target for translational control.In archaea, initiation of translation involves a macromolecular complex containing the small subunit of the ribosome, mRNA, an initiator methionyl tRNA (Met-tRNAiMet) and three initiation factors (aIF1, aIF1A and aIF2). Interestingly, each of three initiation factors has an ortholog in eukaryotes.Archaeal and eukaryotic tRNAi have highly conserved bases A1-U72, at the extremity of the acceptor stem. This base pair was shown to be important for discrimination of initiator tRNAs from elongator tRNAs. In addition, other studies suggest the importance of the geometry of the A1-U72 pair for the initiator identity of those tRNAs. At the beginning of my thesis, no structural information was available to explain how the characteristics of the A1-U72 pair were involved in the selection of the initiator tRNA. At first, my thesis work involved the construction of an E. coli strain using as only source of tRNAi, a bacterial variant of tRNA initiator (tRNAfMet) having a base pair A1-U72 (tRNAfMetA1-U72). The use of this strain allowed us to obtain large quantities of purified tRNAfMetA1-U72. In addition, the crystal structure of this tRNAfMetA1-U72 has been determined at 2.8 Å of resolution. An unusual arrangement of bases A1 and U72 was observed.All archaeal translation initiation actors being available in the laboratory, a study of the archeal translation initiation complex by cryo-electron microscopy was achieved. The study identified two conformations of the tRNAi. In the first complex, both conformations (IC0-Premote (5.3 Å resolution) and IC1-Pin (7.5 Å resolution)) allowed us to propose a model for the accommodation of the initiator tRNA during start codon recognition.Finally, I was also interested in the role of the aIF1 factor. Availability of 3D structures, assembly models and alignments of the archeal aIF1 sequences allowed us to identify amino acids or regions that could be involved in ribosome binding and/or in the selection of initiator tRNA. In order to study the involvement of these regions, I have developed a method to study the binding of aIF1 to the small ribosomal subunit using fluorescence anisotropy. This study highlights two basic residues of aIF1 involved in binding to the ribosome. On the other hand, the roles of aIF1 in the selection of the start codon and in the stabilization of initiation complex on the mRNA were studied by the ribosome footprint method also called « toeprint ».

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Antibiotic resistance is a growing problem on a global scale. Increasing numbers of bacteria resistant toward one or multiple antibiotics could return us to the high mortality rates for infectious diseases of the pre-antibiotic era. The need for development of new classes of antibiotics is great as is increased understanding of the mechanisms underlying the development of antibiotic resistance. We have investigated the emergence of resistance to peptide deformylase inhibitors, a new class of antibiotics that target bacterial protein synthesis. The fitness of resistant mutants as well as their propensity to acquire secondary compensatory mutations was assessed in order to gain some insight into the potential clinical risk of resistance development. Most of this work was done in the bacterium Salmonella typhimurium, due to the availability of excellent genetic tools to study these phenomena. In addition, we have studied the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus as peptide deformylase inhibitors have been shown to have the greatest effect on Gram-positive organisms. In the course of this work we also examined the mechanistic aspects of translation initiation. Using a cell-free in vitro translation system we studied the effects of various components on translation initiation. These results have been combined with results obtained from resistant and compensated bacterial strains in vivo to gain new insights into the mechanisms of translation initiation.

No description available.

Phosphorylation of the alpha-subunit of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha) on Serine 51 (Ser51) is an early event associated with downregulation of protein synthesis at the level of translation and constitutes a potent mechanism to overcome various stress conditions. In mammals, four eIF2alpha-kinases PERK, PKR, HRI and GCN2, activated following specific stresses, have been involved in this process. Our laboratory has previously demonstrated that the adaptor protein Nck, composed only of Src homology domains and classically implicated in cell signaling by activated plasma membrane receptor tyrosine kinases, modulates translation through its interaction with the beta-subunit of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2beta). Moreover, we reported that Nck-1 overexpression antagonizes the inhibition of translation in endoplasmic reticulum stress condition and prevents the PERK-mediated phosphorylation of the alpha-subunit of eIF2 on Ser51. In this thesis, I demonstrate that the adaptor protein Nck-1 modulates eIF2alpha-kinase-mediated eIF2alphaSer51 phosphorylation in a specific manner. More particularly, I show that Nck-1 overexpression reduces eIF2alpha phosphorylation in conditions activating PKR or HRI as described previously for PERK. In contrast, I observe that overexpression of Nck-1 in mammalian cells fails to attenuate eIF2alphaSer51 phosphorylation in response to amino acid starvation, a stress condition activating GCN2. I further confirm this observation by showing that Nck-1 fails to alter eIF2alphaSer51 phosphorylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for which the sole eIF2alpha-kinase is GCN2. In addition, I report that Nck-1 reduces PKR activation in response to dsRNA. I also find that Nck-1 reduces dsRNA-induced activation of p38 MAPK, a PKR-downstream substrate, and cell death. Finally, I show that Nck-1 interacts exclusively with the inactivated form of PKR in a Src homology domain independent manner. All together these data uncover the existence of a novel mechanism regulating phosphorylation of eIF2alphaSer51 under various stress conditions and identifies Nck-1 as a modulator of the tumor suppressor and antiviral protein kinase PKR.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Gene expression is a highly coordinated process that relies upon appropriate regulation of translation for protein homeostasis. Regulation of protein synthesis largely occurs at the initiation step in which the translational start site is selected by ribosomes and associated initiating factors. In addition to the coding sequences (CDS) for protein products, short upstream open reading frames (uORFs) located in the 5’-leader of mRNAs are selected for translation initiation. While uORFs are largely considered to be inhibitory to translation at the downstream CDS, uORFs can also promote initiation of CDS translation in response to environmental stresses. Multiple transcripts associated with stress adaptation are preferentially translated through uORF-mediated mechanisms during activation of the Integrated Stress Response (ISR). In the ISR, phosphorylation of α subunit of the translation initiation factor eIF2α (eIF2α~P) during environmental stresses results in a global reduction in protein synthesis that functions to conserve energy and nutrient resources and facilitate reprogramming of gene expression. Many key regulators of the ISR network are subject to preferential translation in the response to eIF2α-P. These preferentially translated genes include the pro-apoptotic transcriptional activator Chop that modifies gene expression programs, feedback regulator Gadd34 that targets the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 to dephosphorylate eIF2α~P, and glutamyl-prolyl tRNA synthetase Eprs that increases the charged tRNA pool and primes the cell for resumption of protein synthesis after stress remediation. Ribosome bypass of at least one inhibitory uORF is a common theme between Chop, Gadd34, and Eprs, which allows for their regulated expression in response to cellular stress. However, different features encoded within the uORFs of the Chop, Gadd34, and Eprs mRNAs provide for regulation of their inhibitory functions, illustrating the complexities of uORF-mediated regulation of gene-specific translation. Importantly, preferentially translated ISR targets can also be transcriptionally regulated in response to cellular stress and misregulation of transcriptional or translational expression of Gadd34 can elicit maladaptive cell responses that contribute to disease. These mechanisms of translation control are conserved throughout species, emphasizing the importance of translation control in appropriate gene expression and the maintenance of protein homeostasis and health in diverse cellular conditions.

No description available.

Deoxyhypusine synthase (DHS) catalyzes the first step in the hypusination of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A (eIF5A). In human cells, two eIF5A isoforms are present, eIF5A-1 and eIF5A-2, and DHS catalyzes the hypusination of both. Since both eIF5As are substrates for DHS, the biological functions of DHS are likely to be exerted through the various post-translational forms of these two eIF5As. The lysine form of eIF5A-1 has been associated with apoptosis, while the hypusinated form of eIF5A-1 has been associated with cell viability and proliferation. eIF5A-2 has been found to be over-expressed in certain cancers and has been proposed to function as an oncogene. Dhs is also over-expressed in certain human cancers and is a metastatic signature gene. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of DHS in cancer cell invasiveness, cell proliferation, and apoptosis using RNA interference. The main finding of the study is that DHS siRNA treatment decreases invasiveness of PC3 cells in vitro. Both DHS 0 siRNA treatment and DHS 1/b siRNA treatment significantly reduced cell invasiveness of PC3 cells as measured by the Matrigel invasion assay. Potential confounding variables, such as differences in cell proliferation or differences in apoptosis in response to DHS siRNA treatment, were assessed using the XTT cell proliferation assay and the Annexin V/Pi apoptosis assay, and they were found not to have an effect. In the absence of serum, DHS siRNA treatment did not result in significant decrease in cell proliferation compared to the control siRNA treatment. Furthermore, DHS siRNA treatment did not induce apoptosis in PC3 cells under the present experimental conditions. In conclusion, depletion of DHS with RNAi reduces invasiveness, but does not induce apoptosis in PC3 cells. The significance of the research is that the anti-invasiveness effect of DHS depletion in metastatic cancer cells is shown for the first time in the present study. Thus, DHS depletion may be useful to combat cancer in conjunction with L-eIF5A-1 over-expression.