There is a paucity of scientific evidence into the lived experience of people who have a history of injecting drug use and are living with leg ulceration. Portraying the true voice of injecting drug users (IDUs) through narrative means is a novelty in contemporary literature. The representation of the life and the person behind the leg ulcer, having experienced addiction, is original from a purist narrative perspective. This study, led from the perspective of a nurse-researcher leading in the field of wound management, offers a unique opportunity to gain a rare glimpse into the daily life of IDUs, as reported in their own words. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of injecting drug users living with leg ulceration using qualitative methodology. A naturalistic paradigm framed the design by allowing participants to control the data in an unrestricted an open manner without direct intrusion form the researcher. Qualitative methodology was central to collecting data on life experience and feelings. The ethics process detailed a rigorous application to explore the professional, ethical virtues from the perspective of an insider-outsider working with sensitive data in a marginalised population. Diaries were kept and recorded by participants over four weeks in their routine daily life; this was followed by semi-structured interviews. The diaries allowed a unique insight into the past, present and future of IDUs and how their ulcer affected their lives. The diaries also facilitated a means of reflection on themselves and their wounded body. The interviews offered an opportunity to explore in detail the diary entries and other stories participants wished to share. The study recruited twelve participants from leg ulcer clinics set in London; three women and nine men older than 18 years of age (median age of 52 years; range 35 - 62 years). Ten completed the data collection process; two of the participants, aged 61 and 62 years, were married. Gatekeepers working with IDUs with leg ulceration were central to the process of engagement and recruitment. Participants welcomed the design as an opportunity to voice and share their journey of living with an open wound. The findings revealed the detailed suffering participants endured living with their ulcer: pain, shame and stigma were clearly voiced in their narratives. The majority of participants had experienced some form of stigma during their life and this was exacerbated as they were drug users. The self-blame and punishment triggered by this felt stigma was a detriment to the health of participants. Those in contact with specialist wound care services saw a significant improvement in wound healing and this had a positive impact on their wellbeing and their overall outlook on life. Participants also voiced enacted-stigma experienced from encounters in health practice. These negative experiences exacerbated the self-stigma. Findings also portrayed the multiple characteristics and talents of participants including humour, art and resilience. This research contributes to science and practice by understanding the lives of IDUs living with leg ulceration. It provides a platform from which to engage both generalists and specialists who care for these patients and has the potential to influence medical and social policy-making and clinical practice in this field. By means of narrative inquiry, this study may challenge the conventional social stereotypes, the taboos and the stigma still experienced by this patient group in health care.

Recent advances in HIV antiretroviral therapy and the availability of prophylaxis for opportunistic infections, combined with the opportunity to prevent perinatal HIV infection, underscores the value of early diagnosis of HIV infection. HIV antibody home test kits offer individuals the opportunity to collect a blood sample, send it anonymously to a laboratory, and receive counseling and referral over the phone. Home HIV testing may reduce barriers to testing that have precluded individuals from learning their HIV serostatus, and if seropositive, from taking advantage of efficacious therapeutic and preventive regimens. This study employed a randomized-controlled prospective field trial design to determine if the availability of home testing increased HIV testing relative to traditional counseling and testing among injecting drug users in three HIV prevention/drug treatment contexts; methadone maintenance, hospital-based detoxification, and syringe exchange. Theoretical correlates to HIV testing were also evaluated. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that participants randomized to home testing were 2.2 times more likely than those randomized to traditional counseling and testing to test for HIV antibodies in this study after controlling for demographic, HIV risk, and theoretical variables. No differences were observed between testing methods with regard to obtaining HIV test results. The relationship between HIV testing and test type was moderated by drug treatment context and history of homeless, with home testing resulting in increased testing among methadone participants and persons without a history of homelessness. Analyses of theoretical variables suggested that prevention education stressing the benefits of HIV testing, personal risk of HIV infection, and efficacy of available treatments could increase HIV testing among injecting drug users. Participants randomized to home testing were more satisfied with testing and telephone-based counseling than were those receiving traditional testing and face-to-face counseling. Home testing was associated with increased testing perhaps due to reduced barriers to testing. To further reduce barriers to testing and to increase testing among injecting drug users, consideration should be given to incorporating oral fluid testing and rapid result capability in home test kits. Counseling could be made available as needed, delivered by telephone, and contingent upon the volitional control of the testing consumer.

Studien har gjorts mot bakgrund av den pågående diskussionen gällande införandet av sprutbytesverksamhet i Jönköpings län och vill till den diskussionen tillföra de skilda erfarenheterna som finns i fyra olika existerande sprutbytesprogrammen i Sverige, att jämföra likheter och skillnader i praxis och att relatera dessa erfarenheter till deras mål och resurser. Trots att lagen om sprutbyte trädde i kraft år 2006 är sprutbyte fortfarande ett kontroversiellt ämne i Sverige. I denna omtvistade form av preventiv verksamhet finns det dock en viktig del som gör ämnet mer relevant och det är de goda, sociala bieffekter som programmen medför. Dessa omnämns i studien som paramedicinsk vård. Metoden som ligger till grund för studien är kvalitativa, semistrukturerade intervjuer. Materialet har sedan analyserats för betydelsen av sitt innehåll och genom organisationsteori. Utgångspunkten är avhandlingar, vetenskapliga artiklar och litteratur i ämnet sprutbyte. Vid sprutbytesprogrammen i Sverige skiljer sig uppfattningarna åt gällande behovet och implementeringen av den paramedicinska vården i verksamheten. Likaså går åsikterna isär mellan de forskare, politiker och professionellt verksamma som intervjuats. En gemensam nämnare är dock synen på paramedicin i stort som något betydelsefullt för personer i aktivt missbruk, oavsett om det är landstinget eller socialtjänsten som bedriver den. Studiens konklusion blir således att denna form av verksamhet kräver ett holistiskt perspektiv av den vård som ska bedrivas. Samarbete utanför landstingens och kommunens gränser verkar gynnande. Landstinget har större inflytande än kommunen men kommunen har å andra sidan större resurser när det gäller paramedicinska vårdinsatser. I de landsting där eventuella sprutbytesverksamheter diskuteras kan studien ge exempel på goda respektive mindre goda paramedicinska insatser vid de program som idag är verksamma. / In light of the ongoing discussion regarding the possible introduction of needle exchange programs in Jönköping county, this study aims to compare similarities and differences in practice at four different needle exchange programs in Sweden and to relate these experiences to their objectives and resources. Despite the fact that the law of needle exchange entered into force 2006, needle exchange programs are still a controversial subject of discussion in Sweden. In this contested form of infection care there is an important part though which makes the subject more legitimate. That is the positive social side effects which come as a result of the programs. These effects are mentioned in the study as paramedic care. The method underlying the study is qualitative, semi structured interviews. The material has been analyzed for the relevance of its content and also through organization theory. The starting point is theses, scientific articles and literature on the subject of needle exchange. At the needle exchange programs in Sweden the perceptions regarding the need for and the implementation of paramedical care differs as well as the views of researchers, politicians and professionally active that we interviewed on the subject. A common denominator, however, is the perception of paramedical care at large as something significant for people in active addiction, whether it is the country council or the social services that engaged in it. The conclusion of the study is thus that this form of activities requires a holistic perspective of the care that should be conducted. Cooperation outside the county and municipal boundaries seems favorable. The county councils have more influence than the municipalities but the municipalities on the other hand have greater resources in terms of paramedical care efforts. In the county councils where any needle exchange activities are up for discussion this study could give examples on favorable and less favorable paramedical activities at programs that are currently active.

Safer injection facilities (SIFs) provide a clean and supervised environment, thereby reducing health risks to drug users. Potential benefits include fewer overdoses, decreased rates of HIV, Hepatitis, and other blood-borne viruses, a reduction in open drug use, increased opportunities for health services and treatments, and cost savings to society. A pilot safer injection site is expected to open in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside in September 2003. This study assesses community attitudes and concerns with respect to SIFs. Focus groups with police officers, street nurses, and injection drug users in February and March 2003 revealed that they are supportive of the sites. Concerns related to the community impacts, external supports, administration, process, safety, and special populations (e.g. women, youth) were indicated. Special attention should be paid to the involvement of injection drug users in planning and programming, the inclusion of peer workers, the relationships between injection drug users, the wider population, and the police, and safety for marginalized populations. Recommendations to address concerns and ensure inclusive processes are provided.

Background: At the point, when injecting still seems to be the most common use among problem drug users and there has been no change in the long term, despite the long tradition of harm reduction services in the Czech Republic, it is important to examine the context of this issue and try to understand it more closely, and therefore understanding the phenomenon of needle fixation. Aims: The paper seeks to address whether the risky behaviour level of the needle-fixated drug users differs from those who are not needle-fixated. The second aim is to examine a possible connection between the injecting users psychopathological characteristics and the phenomenon of needle fixation. The third intention of the work is to find out whether and pošibly how the level of risky behaviour differs among needle-fixated drug users in the context of their psychopathological characteristics. Methods: The chosen method of data collection was a battery of questionnaires: IN-COME questionnaire, BBV-TRAQ, SCL-90 and NEFPRO. The battery of the questionnaire was administered with the participation of the researcher. In addition to descriptive statistical methods, the Mann-Whitney test (4 tests), the Chi-square test (11 tests) and the Spearman correlation coefficient were chosen as methods for testing based on research...

No description available.

Background: Intravenous way of drug application is the most common between problem drug users at Prague. Due Mravčík et al. (2015), the estimate is, that there was a 15 700 intravenous drug users at Prague in 2014 (7 500 pervitin users, 2 500 heroin users and 5 700 buprenorphine users). And that they spend about 15,5 millions of syringes every year (Švůgerová, 2015). But the data in Annual report on drug situation 2014 says, there was only 2, 6 millions of syringes distributed (Mravčík et al., 2015). This means, that Prague intravenous drug users spend many more syringes, that are distributed by low-treshold services and pharmacies. That is a reason of charting of the behaviour of drug users in connection with application of addictive substance, especially how the consuption of injecting material is connected with single type of drug user. Aims: The main aim of the thesis is to find out the frequency of drug application in intravenous drug users and to estimate the total consumption of injecting materialial depended on single of users typology (used drugs, frequncy of contact with harm reduction services…) Research sample: The sample consists of 155 clients of harm reduction services at Prague (3 contact centers and 3 streetwork programs). All of the respondents stated the intravenous drug using in...