Doctor of Philosophy / Department of Entomology / James F. Campbell / James R. Nechols / Theoretical and empirical ecological research has emphasized the need for understanding how animals perceive and respond to landscape structure and the importance of integrating both behavioral and landscape approaches when studying movement behavior. Knowledge of insect movement behavior is essential for understanding and modeling dispersal and population structure and developing biologically-based integrated pest management programs. My dissertation research addresses questions concerning how insects respond to landscape structure by examining movement behavior of an important stored-product pest, red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum), in experimental landscapes. Results show that beetles modify movement behavior depending on landscape structure. Edge effects and interpatch distances may influence landscape viscosity, or the degree to which landscape structure facilitates or impedes movement, resulting in significant differences in velocity and tortuosity (amount of turning) of movement pathways, as well as retention time in landscapes with different levels of habitat abundance and aggregation. Perceptual range, or the distance from which habitat is detected, appears to be limited while beetles are moving in a landscape as they did not respond to a flour resource before physical encounter. Beetles showed differential responses to patches with various characteristics, entering covered patches more quickly than uncovered patches with more resource or the same amount of resource. Permeability of patches changed with subsequent encounters suggesting that full evaluation of patch quality may only occur after entering a patch. Beetles responded to landscape structure differently depending on the activity in which they were engaged. Distribution of movement pathways was similar to that of the habitat, but distribution of oviposition sites were significantly more aggregated than pathways and habitat. Oviposition site choice may be influenced by a complex set of factors which include previous visitation, amount of resource, travel costs, and edge effects. Insights were gained concerning how red flour beetle perceives resources, modifies search strategies, responds to boundaries, and chooses reproductive sites in patchy landscapes. This research provides new information regarding how red flour beetle interacts with landscape structure that has implications in the areas of behavioral and landscape ecology and applications in stored-product insect ecology.

We are currently faced with the global challenge of conserving biological diversity while also increasing food production to meet the demands of a growing human population. Land-use change, primarily resulting from conversion to production land, is currently the leading cause of biodiversity loss. This occurs through habitat loss, fragmentation of remaining natural habitats, and resulting edge effects. Land-sparing and land-sharing approaches have been discussed as alternative ways to engineer landscapes to mitigate biodiversity loss while meeting production objectives. However, these represent extremes on a continuum of real-world landscapes, and it will be important to understand the mechanisms by which adjacent land use affects natural remnant ecosystems in order to make local land-management decisions that achieve conservation, as well as production, objectives. This thesis investigates the impact of juxtaposing production and natural forest on the community-wide interactions between lepidopteran herbivores and their parasitoids, as mediated by parasitoid spillover between habitats. The first and overarching objective was to determine whether herbivore productivity drives asymmetrical spillover of predators and parasitoids, primarily from managed to natural habitats, and whether this spillover alters trophic interactions in the recipient habitat. The study of trophic interactions at a community level requires understanding of both direct and indirect interactions. However, community-level indirect interactions are generally difficult to predict and measure, and these have therefore remained understudied. Apparent competition is an indirect interaction mechanism thought to be very important in structuring host-parasitoid assemblages. However, this is known primarily from studies of single species pairs, and its community-wide impacts are less clear. Therefore, my second objective was to determine whether apparent competition could be predicted for all species pairs within an herbivore assemblage, based on a measure of parasitoid overlap. My third objective was to determine whether certain host or parasitoid species traits can predict the involvement of those species in apparent competition. My key findings were that there is a net spillover of generalist predators and parasitoids from plantation to native forest, and that for generalists, this depends on herbivore abundance in the plantation forest. Herbivore populations across the edge were linked by shared parasitoids in apparent competition. Consequently, an experimental reduction of herbivore density in the plantation forest changed parasitism rates in the natural forest, as predicted based on parasitoid overlap. Finally, several host and parasitoid traits were identified that can predict the degree to which host or parasitoid species will be involved in apparent competition, a finding which may have extensive application in biological control, as well as in predicting spillover edge effects. Overall, this work suggests that asymmetrical spillover between production and natural habitats occurs in relation to productivity differences, with greater movement of predators and parasitoids in the managed-to-natural forest direction. The degree to which this affected species interactions has implications for landscape design to achieve conservation objectives in production landscapes.