Many neurons in the auditory midbrain are tuned to binaural cues. Two prominent binaural cues are the interaural intensity difference (IID) and the interaural time difference (ITD). The ITD cue can further be classified as either an ongoing ITD, which compares the phase difference in the waveform of low frequency stimuli present at either ear, or an onset ITD, which compares the onset time of arrival of two stimuli at either ear. Little research has been done on the sensitivity of single neurons to onset ITDs in the auditory system, particularly in bats. The current study examines the response properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC) of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, to onset ITDs in response to high frequency pure tones. Measures of neurons’ dynamic response—the segment of the ITD function exhibiting the highest rate of change in activity—revealed an average change of 36% of its maximum response within the estimated behaviorally relevant range of ITDs. Time-intensity trading describes the ability of the brain to compensate the binaural time cue (ITD) cue for the binaural intensity cue (IID) and can be measured as the horizontal shift of an ITD function at various IIDs. Across all IC neurons, an average time-intensity trading ratio of 30 μs/dB was calculated to measure the sensitivity of IC neurons’ ITD response to changing IIDs. Minimum and maximum ITD responses were found to be clustered within a narrow range of ITDs. The average peak ITD response occurred at 268 μs and is consistent with findings in other mammals. All results in ITD tuning, time-intensity trading, and response maximum were invariant to stimulus frequency, confirming that IC neurons responded to onset ITDs and not ongoing ITDs. These results suggest the potential for high frequency onset cues to assist in the azimuthal localization of sound in echolocating bats. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc)

Spatial hearing is crucial in real life but deteriorates in participants with severe sensorineural hearing loss or single-sided deafness. This ability can potentially be improved with a unilateral cochlear implant (CI). The present study investigated measures of sound localization in participants with single-sided deafness provided with a CI. Sound localization was measured separately at eight loudspeaker positions (4°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) on the CI side and on the normal-hearing side. Low- and high-frequency noise bursts were used in the tests to investigate possible differences in the processing of interaural time and level differences. Data were compared to normal-hearing adults aged between 20 and 83. In addition, the benefit of the CI in speech understanding in noise was compared to the localization ability. Fifteen out of 18 participants were able to localize signals on the CI side and on the normal-hearing side, although performance was highly variable across participants. Three participants always pointed to the normal-hearing side, irrespective of the location of the signal. The comparison with control data showed that participants had particular difficulties localizing sounds at frontal locations and on the CI side. In contrast to most previous results, participants were able to localize low-frequency signals, although they localized high-frequency signals more accurately. Speech understanding in noise was better with the CI compared to testing without CI, but only at a position where the CI also improved sound localization. Our data suggest that a CI can, to a large extent, restore localization in participants with single-sided deafness. Difficulties may remain at frontal locations and on the CI side. However, speech understanding in noise improves when wearing the CI. The treatment with a CI in these participants might provide real-world benefits, such as improved orientation in traffic and speech understanding in difficult listening situations.