Since the 1900s, the number of deaths attributable to cardiovascular disease has steadily risen. With the advent of antihypertensive drugs and non-invasive surgical procedures, such as intravascular stenting, these numbers have begun to level off. Despite this trend, the number of patients diagnosed with some form of cardiovascular disease has only increased. By 2030, prevalence of coronary heart disease is expected to increase approximately by 18% in the United States. By 2050, prevalence of peripheral arterial occlusive disease is expected to increase approximately by 98% in the U.S. No single drug or surgical intervention offers a complete solution to these problems. Thus, a multi-faceted regimen of lifestyle changes, medication, and device or surgical interventions is usually necessary. A potential adjunct therapy and cost-effective solution for treating cardiovascular disease that has been overlooked is neurostimulation. Recent studies show that using neurostimulation techniques, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), can help to reduce ischemic pain, lower blood pressure, increase blood flow to the periphery, and decrease systemic vascular resistance. The mechanisms by which these hemodynamic changes occur is still under investigation. The primary aim of this thesis is to elucidate these mechanisms through a thorough synthesis of the existing literature on this subject. Neurostimulation, specifically TENS, is thought to modulate both the metaboreflex and norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve terminals. To test the hypothesis that TENS increases local blood flow, decreases mean arterial pressure, and decreases cutaneous vascular resistance compared to placebo, in which the electrodes are attached but no electrical stimulation is applied, a protocol was developed to test the effect of neurostimulation on healthy subjects. Implementation of this protocol in a pilot study will determine if neurostimulation causes significant changes in blood flow using the most relevant perfusion measurement instrumentation. Before conducting this study, pre-pilot comparison studies of interferential current therapy (IFC) versus TENS, low frequency (4 Hz) TENS versus high frequency (100 Hz) TENS, and electrode placement on the back versus the forearm were conducted. The only statistically significant difference found was that the application of IFC on the back decreased the reperfusion time, meaning that the time required to reach the average baseline perfusion unit value after occlusion decreased. Further pre-pilot work investigating these different modalities and parameters is necessary to ensure that favorable hemodynamic changes can be detected in the pilot study.

M.Tech. / aim of this unblinded randomized control study was to compare Chiropractic Adjustive Therapy (CAT) to Interferential Current Therapy (IFC) as treatment for Painful Minor Intervertebral Dysfunction (PMID) in the lumbar spine. The effects of CAT and IFC on lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) and pain relief from PMID were also examined. The participants of the trials were treated at the Chiropractic Day Clinic at the University of Johannesburg. Thirty participants presenting with Low Back Pain (LBP) and PMID on segmental intervertebral examination were used for this study and divided into two groups of fifteen. Group A participants were treated with CAT applied to the painful intervertebral segment. Group B participants were treated with IFC over the painful intervertebral segment. The objective data for this research was recorded by the readings obtained from the application of transverse pressure by a Pressure Algometer to the lateral aspect of a painful spinous process. Further objective readings were taken using a Digital Inclinometer to measure the participants Range of Motion (ROM). Subjective data was obtained by an Oswestry Pain and Disability Index (ODI). The subjective and the objective data were both recorded at the first, fourth and seventh visit which took place over a three week period. The results of the study showed that Group A had a statistically significant decrease in Pressure Algometer Readings and ODI scores. Group A also showed a statistically significant improvement in ROM readings for Left Lateral Flexion, Left Rotation and Right Rotation. Group B did not show any statistical significance in either the subjective or objective data. Importantly, an Inter-group comparison for the Pressure Algometer Readings also revealed an increasing statistically significant difference between Group A and Group B from the first to the fourth and seventh visit. The pain elicited by transverse pressure to a spinous process is core to the diagnosis of PMID, which can result in many pain syndromes of vertebral origin (Maigne, 2006). This research provides evidence that CAT is more beneficial than IFC for the treatment of PMID in the lumbar spine over a short and longer period of time.