Thesis (master's)--al-Maʻhad al-ʻĀlī lil-Qaḍāʼ, Riyadh. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 185-189).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 330-349).

Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Glasgow, 2002. / Ph.D. thesis submitted to the Faculty of Divinity, University of Glasgow, 2002. Includes bibliographical references. Print version also available.

Thesis (doctoral) -- Jāmiʻat al-Qāhirah, 1991. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 359-381).

Thesis (master's)--al-Maʻhad al-ʻĀlī lil-Qaḍāʼ, Riyadh. / Bibliography: p. 185-189.

Thesis (master's)--Kullīyat al-Imām al-Awzāʻī, Beirut, 1992. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 441-452) and indexes.

Notwithstanding the enactment of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 the recognition of systems of religious, personal or family law for certain cultural and religious groups has either been limited or is virtually non-existent. To this extent, marriages concluded in terms of Islamic rites do not enjoy the same legal recognition that is accorded to civil and customary marriages. Non-recognition of Muslim marriages means there is no legal regulatory framework to enforce any of the consequences that arise as a result of the marriage, or any orders that are made by the Ulama, thereby creating a perilous situation that has dire consequences for spouses to a Muslim marriage. Despite South Africa’s commitment to the right of equality and freedom of religion, the courts have acknowledged that the failure to grant recognition to Muslim marriages on the ground of gender equality, has worsened the plight of women in these marriages, in that they were left without effective legal protection, should the union be dissolved either by death or divorce. Whilst the ad hoc recognition of certain consequences of Muslim marriages by the judiciary has gone a some way to redress the plight of Muslim women, and provided relief to the lived realities of Muslim women, these decisions are in fact contrary to the teachings and principles of Islam and therefore problematic for Muslims. These court decisions, that are in conflict with Muslim Personal Law (MPL), will ultimately lead to the emergence of a distorted set of laws relating to Muslim family law. This is a real cause for concern. This thesis is written from an Islamic legal theory perspective, which is contrary to western legal theory, as the latter adopts a human rights perspective. The basis of modern western democratic societies is a constitution that is premised on human rights and equality and which advocates the notion that the rights contained in the constitution reign supreme in all matters, religion included. Therefore, where a conflict arises in respect of the freedom of religion and the right to equality, western ideologies and philosophies dictate that the latter trump the former. This would inevitably mean that religious law would have to be adapted and ultimately amended so that it is in compliance with the constitution. From an Islamic religious perspective, this is not feasible and practicing Muslims will find this untenable. This may be legally uncomfortable in South Africa as a constitutional democracy but it is the reality for the adherents of the Muslim faith. A draft Muslim Marriages Bill (MMB) was released in 2003, and an amended MMB was tabled in Parliament in 2010. Both MMBs propose the legal recognition and regulation of Muslim marriages in South Africa. However, the two major issues delaying the enactment of the MMB into legislation are, firstly, whether or not the MMB would pass constitutional muster and secondly, the lack of agreement in the Muslim community on whether the MMB is Shari’ah compliant. Despite the largely consultative process that the MMBs underwent the legislative attempts to enact the MMB into legislation has not been successful. This thesis seeks to provide a possible solution whereby legislation regulating MPL law can be implemented in South Africa, notwithstanding the apparent conflict existing between MPL and the rights contained in the Bill of Rights. Notwithstanding the preference shown by the legislature to enact the MMB into legislation which will grant recognition to Muslim marriages, it is submitted there is a need for the legislature to rethink the approach that has to date been adopted. To this extent, it is submitted that the legislature should reconsider granting recognition to Muslim marriages by enacting legislation that takes the form of general legislation where state recognition is granted to all religious marriages, whether it be Muslim, Hindu or Jewish marriages. General legislation would mean that the state would require the marriage to be registered. However, the prescribed requirements, formalities and the consequences of the marriage would be determined by the chosen religious system of the spouses. On a national level a comparative analysis between Islamic law and the South African legal system, relating to the law of marriage is conducted. For the comparative analysis on an international level the law of marriage in England and Wales has been chosen. South Africa and England and Wales share a commitment to human rights and have adopted various approaches in respect of accommodating the application of Islamic law. Furthermore, an internal pluralism exists within the Muslim communities in South Africa, England and Wales as the majority of Muslims in these countries have to varying degrees developed diverse strategies to ensure compliance with Islamic law, and as well as South African and English law. The manner in which MPL is granted recognition needs to be given careful consideration as the implementation of this legislation will only be successful if it is compatible with the rulings and teachings of Islamic law. Caution should therefore be exercised to ensure that the fundamental aspects of MPL are not compromised as this will result in the legislation not being Shari’ah compliant and there will be no buyin from the Muslim community, with the consequence that this legislation will be mere paper law.

The thesis examines the development of the concept of Ijmāʻ, consensus, in Imāmī-Shīʻī principles of jurisprudence (uṣūl al-fiqh). In the introduction to the thesis there is an analysis of the concept of Ijmāʻ as generally understood in Islamic jurisprudence and a discussion of the approach adopted in the thesis as well as a general outline of the literature involved. The introduction also outlines the background to Imāmī Shīʻī jurisprudence during the time of the presence of the Imāms and the period immediately after the greater occultation of the Twelfth Imām. The main body of the thesis analyses the available major texts written by Imāmī-Shīʻī Uṣūli scholars from the time of al-Shaykh al-Mufid (413/1022) to the end of the nineteenth century with a brief discussion of the views of some recent Imāmī Shīʻī scholars. From the outset a difference of emphasis can be observed between scholars who argue in favour of a major role for reason, such as al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā (436/1044) and those in favour of a greater reliance on Traditions from the Prophet and the Imāms, which is moderately represented by al-Shaykh al-Ṭūsī (459/1067). The subsequent generations of scholars refined and further defined these concepts. In particular, in opposition to the movement in favour of general adherence to the Traditions, there arose from the proponents of the use of uṣūl al-fiqh a definition which gave much greater scope to the use of reason and the continuing guidance of the Twelfth Imām. The latter proposition reached its final form in Imām-Shīʻī uṣūl al-fiqh at the end of the nineteenth century in Kifayat al-uṣūl by Muḥammad Kāẓim al-Khurāsānī. Finally, there is a brief examination of the work of some recent scholars and a conclusion to the thesis.

Text in Arabic without English summary / Religious Studies and Arabic / D. Lit. et Phil. (Islamic Studies)

No description available.