Hydration of the vocal folds is important for the production of normal voice. Dehydration makes voice production more difficult and increases vocal effort. Laryngeal desiccation has been shown to increase phonation threshold pressure (PTP) and self-perceived phonatory effort (PPE) in females. Nebulized saline may reverse or offset this effect. However, few data exist regarding the effects of laryngeal desiccation and nebulized treatments in males. Further, the dose-response relationship between laryngeal desiccation and nebulized hydration treatments is unknown. This study examined the effects of two doses of nebulized isotonic saline following a laryngeal desiccation challenge in healthy male speakers. In a double-blinded, within-subjects design, 10 male college students (age range 18-26 years) attended two data collection sessions involving a 30-minute desiccation challenge followed by 3 mL or 9 mL of nebulized isotonic saline. PTP for the 10th and 80th fundamental frequency (F0) percentiles and PPE were collected before and after the desiccation challenge and at 5, 35, and 65 minutes after the nebulized treatment. PPE increased significantly following the laryngeal desiccation challenge (p < .01). Following nebulization, PPE decreased toward baseline for both doses of isotonic saline (p < .01), but failed to reverse the desiccation effect completely. No statistically significant changes in PTP occurred following the laryngeal desiccation challenge or subsequent treatments. Compared with previous research involving females, these results suggest males may respond differently to laryngeal desiccation and nebulized hydration treatments.

Vocal fold hydration is important for healthy function of the vocal mechanism. Vocal fold surface fluid protects the mucosa and facilitates efficient vocal fold oscillation. Dry air exposure, mouth breathing, insufficient intake of liquids, and behavioral factors may contribute to laryngeal dehydration. Singers are believed to be particularly at risk for voice problems related to dehydration due to environmental and voice use factors. Laryngeal desiccation and nebulized hydration treatments have been shown to influence phonation threshold pressure (PTP) and self-perceived phonatory effort (PPE) in females. However, little research exists exploring the effects of hydration in males. Additionally, few studies have examined the dose-response relationship of hydration treatments. This investigation examined the effects of a laryngeal desiccation challenge and two different doses of nebulized isotonic saline on voice production in trained male singers. In a double-blind, within-subjects repeated measures crossover investigation, 10 male singers (ages 18 to 24) received a 30 minute laryngeal desiccation challenge followed by either 3 mL or 9 mL of nebulized isotonic saline on two consecutive weeks. PTP, PPE, and self-perceived mouth and throat dryness were sampled during the following observations: predesiccation, post-desiccation, and at 5, 35, and 65 minutes post-nebulization. No differences in PTP were observed after desiccation or nebulized treatment. PPE, however, rose significantly after desiccation and returned near baseline after treatment. No significant differences between dosages were observed.

Introduction: Les instillations nasales de solution saline isotonique (INSS) chez les enfants sont recommandées par les pédiatres et des oto-rhino-laryngologistes de notre institution dans le but de prévenir les otites moyennes aigues à répétition (OMAr). Cependant, aucune étude dans la littérature ne vient corroborer ou infirmer cette pratique. Objectifs: Déterminer l’efficacité des INSS dans la prévention des OMAr. Méthode: Projet pilote d’un essai clinique randomisé. Les enfants diagnostiqués avec des OMAr étaient éligibles. Les patients recrutés ont été randomisés en 2 groupes. Seul le groupe traitement procède aux INSS. L’issue primaire est l’incidence d’OMAr pendant une période de 3 mois. Résultats: Vingt-neuf patients satisfaisant les critères d’inclusion et d’exclusion ont consenti à participer. Le taux d’OMAr était inférieur dans le groupe traitement (p=0.03, chi-carré) Conclusion: Les INSS semblent efficaces dans la prévention des OMAr. Une étude multicentrique est indiquée pour vérifier la validité externe et confirmer la sécurité. / Introduction: Normal saline nasal cavity irrigations (NSNI) are commonly recommended by pediatricians and otolaryngologists to prevent recurrent acute otitis media (rAOM). However, no published scientific study corroborates or invalidates this practice. Goal: To determine the efficacy of NSNI to prevent rAOM. Method: Pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. All consecutive patients with a diagnosis of rAOM were eligible. Recruited patients were randomized in 2 groups. Only patients in the treatment group proceeded with NSNI. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of rAOM observed during a 3 month period. Results: Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreed to participate. There was a statistically significant lower incidence of rAOM in the treatment group (p=0.003, Fisher exact). Conclusion: Our results suggest that NSNI could effectively prevent rAOM. A larger scale randomized multicentre study is feasible, and it must be done in order to verify for external validity and to properly assess safety issues.

Introduction: Les instillations nasales de solution saline isotonique (INSS) chez les enfants sont recommandées par les pédiatres et des oto-rhino-laryngologistes de notre institution dans le but de prévenir les otites moyennes aigues à répétition (OMAr). Cependant, aucune étude dans la littérature ne vient corroborer ou infirmer cette pratique. Objectifs: Déterminer l’efficacité des INSS dans la prévention des OMAr. Méthode: Projet pilote d’un essai clinique randomisé. Les enfants diagnostiqués avec des OMAr étaient éligibles. Les patients recrutés ont été randomisés en 2 groupes. Seul le groupe traitement procède aux INSS. L’issue primaire est l’incidence d’OMAr pendant une période de 3 mois. Résultats: Vingt-neuf patients satisfaisant les critères d’inclusion et d’exclusion ont consenti à participer. Le taux d’OMAr était inférieur dans le groupe traitement (p=0.03, chi-carré) Conclusion: Les INSS semblent efficaces dans la prévention des OMAr. Une étude multicentrique est indiquée pour vérifier la validité externe et confirmer la sécurité. / Introduction: Normal saline nasal cavity irrigations (NSNI) are commonly recommended by pediatricians and otolaryngologists to prevent recurrent acute otitis media (rAOM). However, no published scientific study corroborates or invalidates this practice. Goal: To determine the efficacy of NSNI to prevent rAOM. Method: Pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. All consecutive patients with a diagnosis of rAOM were eligible. Recruited patients were randomized in 2 groups. Only patients in the treatment group proceeded with NSNI. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of rAOM observed during a 3 month period. Results: Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and agreed to participate. There was a statistically significant lower incidence of rAOM in the treatment group (p=0.003, Fisher exact). Conclusion: Our results suggest that NSNI could effectively prevent rAOM. A larger scale randomized multicentre study is feasible, and it must be done in order to verify for external validity and to properly assess safety issues.