• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 86
  • 14
  • 14
  • 11
  • 10
  • 5
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 172
  • 172
  • 65
  • 52
  • 33
  • 31
  • 28
  • 27
  • 26
  • 24
  • 24
  • 22
  • 22
  • 20
  • 17
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
31

The moral reality of war defensive force and just war theory /

Underwood, Robert E. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Georgia State University, 2009. / Title from file title page. Andrew Altman, committee chair; Sebastian Rand, Andrew J. Cohen, committee members. Description based on contents viewed July 14, 2009. Includes bibliographical references (p. 85).
32

Waging moral war the importance of principal-agent motivation alignment and constraining doctrine on moral U.S. targeting decisions /

Ruby, Tomislav Z. January 2004 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Kentucky, 2004. / Title from document title page (viewed Oct. 12, 2004). Document formatted into pages; contains ix, 277 p. : ill. Includes abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-274).
33

The issue of warfare in the Scripture and history of the early church during the first four centuries

Bagby, Samuel. January 2000 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M. Div.)--St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary, 2000. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaf 68).
34

The issue of warfare in the Scripture and history of the early church during the first four centuries

Bagby, Samuel. January 2000 (has links)
Thesis (M. Div.)--St. Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary, 2000. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaf 68).
35

Michael Walzer's moral critique of American foreign policy in the context of the post-war American foreign policy debate

Kupfer, Sara M. January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Ohio University, August, 2003. / Title from PDF t.p. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 179-186)
36

An analysis of nature-human conflicts in light of just war theory

Fritz, Allison J. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wyoming, 2007. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on Sept. 24, 2007). Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-98).
37

Thomas Aquinas on just war

Shimek, John Paul. January 2006 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. L.)--Catholic University of America, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 77-78).
38

Supreme threat the just war tradition and the invasion of Iraq /

Fallaize, James, January 2006 (has links)
Thesis (honors)--Georgia State University, 2006. / Title from title screen. Robert D. Sattelmeyer, committee chair. Electronic text (61 p.) : digital, PDF file. Description based on contents viewed May 7, 2007. Includes bibliographical references (p. 55-61).
39

Preventive war : a consequentialist critique /

Guruli, Nino. January 2007 (has links) (PDF)
Undergraduate honors paper--Mount Holyoke College, 2007. Dept. of Philosophy. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 109-110).
40

Soldiers, Self-Defense, and Killing in War

Kilner, Peter 20 May 1998 (has links)
Just-Warists and War-Pacifists disagree on whether soldiers are morally justified in killing each other in wartime combat. Many of their respective arguments, and their contradictory conclusions, are based upon principles of self-defense. In this thesis, I examine the role that principles of self-defense play in the arguments surrounding the moral justification of killing in combat. I do so by critiquing both a Just-Warist argument that relies on self-defense (constructed from the works of Michael Walzer and Judith Jarvis Thomson) and a War-Pacifist argument (developed by Richard Norman) that condemns killing in combat based on the moral requirements of self-defense. I demonstrate that both arguments fail due to their mistaken assumptions that soldiers are not morally responsible for their actions. I conclude by arguing that--once soldiers are recognized as morally responsible agents--killing in combat can be morally justified by principles of self-defense. / Master of Arts

Page generated in 0.1104 seconds