A presente dissertação estuda o direito fundamental ao acesso à justiça sob um plano de realização do direito no Núcleo de Prática Jurídica (NPJ) da Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e Exatas do Vale do São Francisco (FACESF). Esta Faculdade de Bacharelado em Direito está localizada em Belém do São Francisco, estado de Pernambuco, sendo tal cidade a sede de uma Comarca de 1 Entrância. Aborda-se a progressão com pensamento aristotélica sobre Justiça, concepções sobre o homem como sujeito de direito para delinear o pensamento fundante dos direitos fundamentais inerentes ao homem, erigindo o pensamento sobre a realidade que o impõe o acesso à justiça. Contemporaneamente, o acesso à justiça é sentido não só é visto como princípio jurídico existente na Constituição Federal de 1988, mas também estando ínsito como um postulado normativo da citada Carta Constitucional. É visto o acesso à justiça através do estágio na Faculdade de Direito no locus da pesquisa, sendo percebido a realidade social sobre o acesso à justiça, pois é sentida e investigada por meio de delimitação teórica e desenho metodológico, os quais são desenvolvidos para analisar utentes do aparelho NPJ, por ser consentâneo a um olhar sobre o plano de realização do direito ao trazer frutos sociais importantes tanto para os indivíduos quanto para a coletividade. Sendo anotado a realidade da aquisição de espaço de extensão do qual discentes e docentes produzem concretude no plano de realização do direito, plasmando materialmente o escopo da produção científica que é o acesso à justiça. Em relação aos utentes dos serviços do NPJ ao garantir direitos e proporcionar um espaço de conhecimento prático aos discentes. A metodologia foi exploratória tendo sido desenvolvida a produção científica partindo do tratamento empírico de dados e entrevistas semiestruturadas com grupo de utentes, produzidas no NPJ da pesquisa da FACESF, realizando assim um estudo de caso exploratório. A pesquisa científica é importante porque indicar um tangível plano de realidade que não só se observou em tal localidade como também os as falas captadas indicam uma realidade social inclusiva de direitos decorrentes do ensino jurídico. / The present dissertation studies the fundamental right to access to justice under a plan of realization of the right in the Nucleus of Legal Practice (NPJ) of the Faculty of Human and Exact Sciences of the São Francisco Valley (FACESF). This Faculty of Bachelor of Law is located in Belém do São Francisco, state of Pernambuco, being such city the seat of a Region of 1st Intersection. It deals with the progression with Aristotelian thought on Justice, conceptions about the man as subject of right to delineate the founding thought of the inherent fundamental rights to the man, erecting the thought on the reality that imposes him the access to the justice. At the same time, access to justice is not only seen as a legal principle existing in the Federal Constitution of 1988, but also as a normative postulate of the aforementioned Constitutional Charter. It is seen the access to justice through the stage in the Faculty of Law at the locus of research, being perceived the social reality about the access to justice, since it is felt and investigated through theoretical delimitation and methodological design, which are developed to analyze users Of the NPJ apparatus, because it is consistent with a view on the plan of realization of the law by bringing important social fruits both for individuals and for the community. Noting the reality of the acquisition of space of extension of which students and teachers produce concreteness in the plan of realization of the law, materializing materially the scope of the scientific production that is the access to justice. In relation to the users of the NPJ services in guaranteeing rights and providing a space of practical knowledge to the students. The methodology was exploratory and the scientific production was developed starting from the empirical treatment of data and semi-structured interviews with a group of users, produced in the NPJ of the FACESF research, thus carrying out an exploratory case study. Scientific research is important because it indicates a tangible reality plan that not only was observed in such locality but also the statements captured indicate an inclusive social reality of rights arising from legal education.

Recent decades have seen an explosion of research centered on understanding the influential impact that job stressors have on employees' subjective well-being, and now more recently, on objective assessments of physical health. Utilizing baseline data from a larger study funded by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), I conducted a field study on blue-collar employees from two organizations in the construction industry, with the goal of exploring the impact of job stressors on job satisfaction (subjective well-being) and body mass index (objective health), as well as the influence of organizational justice as a moderator and exercise as a mediator in those relationships. In support of previous research, results show that job stressors (job demands, low skill discretion, and low decision authority) all had significant direct effects on job satisfaction in the expected directions, signifying that the fewer demands and more control one has in their work role, the more satisfied one is. Results also indicate that distributive and procedural justice have significant main effects on job satisfaction, illustrating that higher perceptions of justice are related to higher levels of job satisfaction. With respect to objective health, the data provides empirical support for the relationship between job control (skill discretion and decision authority) and BMI; however, job demands did not have a significant main effect on BMI. More importantly, the rarely studied relationship between organizational justice and BMI was investigated (Robbins et al., 2012), with results indicating that procedural and distributive justice are important influences on one's BMI level. Post hoc analyses revealed that distributive and procedural justice are two relevant mediators to consider in the job stressor-job satisfaction relationship, illustrating the importance of considering employees' fairness perceptions with regards to their satisfaction levels. Moreover, exercise was found to be a significant moderator to the relationship between job demands and BMI, as well as the relationship between distributive justice and job satisfaction, shedding light on physical activity within the work and health contexts as a factor that interacts with employees' perceptions of justice and their workload demands to impact their psychological and physical health. Considering the cross-sectional nature of these data, all mediation and moderation results should be interpreted with caution. With empirical support found for the direct association between job stressors and organizational justice and the outcomes of job satisfaction and BMI, this study has significant implications for researchers and practitioners alike to further expand upon these findings and implement them into organizational practice in support of the Total Worker Health initiative, which aims to promote employee safety and health (Schill & Chosewood, 2013). Results suggest a healthy workforce is the result of the combination of employers transforming the work environment into a more just, transparent and trustworthy place to work, starting with the dynamics between supervisors and their employees, in conjunction with targeted interventions on employees' modifiable behaviors, such as engaging in physical activity and healthier eating habits.