Begreppet medarbetarskap är långt ifrån ett välkänt uttryck idag. Det handlar om medarbetarens förhållningssätt till sin arbetsgivare, till sitt arbete och till sina kollegor. Syftet med denna uppsats är för det första att få mer kunskap om begreppets innebörd. För det andra är syftet att få kunskap om hur medarbetare i en kommunal verksamhet uppfattar och praktiserar medarbetarskap utefter en kommunal policy. För det tredje är syftet att ge förslag till hur medarbetarna i undersökningen fortsättningsvis kan bidra till att uppnå ett gott medarbetarskap. Detta för att synliggöra medarbetarnas möjligheter till att påverka sin arbetssituation. Undersökningen har utförts med en kvalitativ metod, där resultatet bygger på åtta intervjuer tillsammans med medarbetare från två arbetsgrupper som tillhör hierarkins lägsta nivå. Resultatet visar att det skiljer sig mellan gruppernas upplevelse och praktiserande av det rådande medarbetarskapet, trots att de tillhör samma organisation och förväntas arbeta utifrån samma kommunala policy. / The concept of employeeship is far from being a well-known expression today. It deals with how employees relate to their employers, their own work and to their fellow employees. The aim of this study is first to gather more knowledge about the concept employeeship and to illustrate similarities and differences between other close concepts. Second, the aim is to gather more knowledge about how employees in two workgroups within the public sector understand and practice employeeship in accordance with municipal policy. Third, the aim is to illuminate how public sector workers can contribute to accomplish a well-developed employeeship. This enables employees to influence their work situation. The research has been carried out with a method of high quality interviews with eight workers from two workgroups at the lowest level. The results reveal that there are differences in how the groups experience and practice the prevailing employeeship, in spite of belonging to the same public sector and are expected to work on the basis of the same municipal policy.

The purpose of this study is to examine Malmö Municipality’s strategies regarding counteracting social and structural homelessness, by describing and comparing the strategic differences between the two categories. We will do this mainly by performing a problem-based policy analysis of three municipal documents regarding the city’s homelessness problem. We will also be performing a theoretical analysis based on Ian Gough’s marxist analysis of the welfare state and institutional theory, respectively. Through our analysis on the municipal policy we have found that structural homelessness is a problem that is prioritized in comparison to social homelessness. This is because of a large increase in the structurally homeless population during the past decade. However, the problem of social homelessness has far more concrete measures to counteract it. This is found through our theoretical analysis to be due to several factors. One of these factors is that structural homelessness is more deeply entwined with the housing market, which affects the difficulty with creating appropriate measures. Another factor is path dependency, which means that structural homlessness as a newer problem affects the municipality’s ability to apply drastic measures. Our conclusion is that Malmö municipality prioritizes solving the problem of social homelessness through concrete measures, even though structural homelessness is seen as a larger problem. This is because of the complex nature of structural homelessness and the difficulty in applying the correct measures.