The sudden and steady increase in the involvement of women in the Mexican labour force beginning in the 1980s, signifies a major shift in gender roles and activities. It is a little studied outcome of Mexico's combination of economic crisis (which served to increase the supply of female labour) and subsequent adoption of neoliberal economic policies (which stimulated the demand for female labour). In fact, what is not known, are the implications of this employment for the Mexican women themselves. The dissertation moves beyond the existing literature on the gendered consequences of employment and economic development, by bringing in the citizenship literature to help define women's status. Specifically, the dissertation proposes a way of determining these consequences by examining three dimensions of women's status, two of which refer to women's roles and capabilities in the public sphere---political and economic---and one which refers to women's status in the private sphere---the household. By disaggregating the status variable, the dissertation highlights the significant improvements in women's status while identifying the remaining obstacles to gender equality. The dissertation develops a number of measures of women's multidimensional status, and assesses the differences between employed and non-employed women using data obtained from a survey of women in Mexico City. In the economic sphere, the findings indicate that employment improves women's status by enhancing women's independence. Employment provides women with the economic resources that enable them to lessen their dependence on men. At the same time, women continue to face inequality in the labour market, signifying the continuing subordination of women. In terms of women's household status, the findings show that women retain the primary responsibility for childcare, and for the maintenance of the home. This inequality is significant, and serves to limit further improvements in

No description available.

Existing theoretical literature fails to explain satisfactorily the differences between the pay of workers that are covered by collective agreements and others who are not. This study aims at providing a model framework which is amenable for an analysis of this issue. Our general-equilibrium approach integrates a dual labor market and a two-sector product market. The results suggest that the so-called 'union wage gap' is largely determined by the degree of centralization of the bargains, and, to a somewhat lesser extent, by the expenditure share of the unionized sector's goods.

Paper [I]- Household Migration and the Local Public Sector: Evidence from Sweden, 1981-1984 (co-authored with Michael L. Wyzan), contains an empirical explo­ration of the nexus between variables related to the local public sector budget and migration. Micro-data is employed in binomial and multinomial-logit regressions esti­mating the probability to migrate. We report results separately for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, because the per capita levels of the tax base and intergovernmen­tal grants are theoretically important migration determinants where population is sparse, while the tax rate may be more important where population is dense. Empirical results support our fiscal hypotheses and are consistent with previous findings on household characteristics. Paper [II]- Internal Gross Migration in Sweden: The effects of Variation in Mobility Grants and Regional Labour Market Conditions, focuses on the effects of labor market conditions and migratory stimuli on over county-border migration. Aggregate data on the flows of all migrants and on the flows of migrants receiving extra mobility stimuli are used in estimations of a single-equation migration model based on the hiring function. The results indicate that regional migration flows respond to changes in labor market conditions in accordance with predictions from economic theory. This result seems mainly to stem from the migratory behavior of the unemployed. In addition, nonmatching migration subsidies at the levels employed are not found to be migration enhancing. Paper [IH]- Employment Opportunities, Wages and Interregional Migration in Sweden 1970-1989, deals with the impact of aggregate labor turnover and regional labor market conditions on gross in- and outmigration. Annual panel data is used in estima­tion of separate in- and outmigration functions, where regional labor market conditions are assumed to be endogenous with migration under two different assumptions concer­ning the working of the labor market. An increase in the regional excess supply of labor is found to increase outmigration and decrease inmigration. Moreover, cyclical variation in labor turnover is positively correlated with gross migration. The hypothesized effects of real wages on migration are not confirmed. The results are not sensitive to the various assumptions concerning regional wage formation considered in this study. Paper [IV]- A Panel Study of Migration, Household Real Earnings and Self-Selec- tion (co-authored with Roger Axelsson). The effects of migration on household real earnings are examined. Data pertain to a sample of stable household constellations in Sweden, 1978-1991. A treatment-effect model is employed, whereby the potential effects of nonrandom sampling of data on earnings for migrants and nonmigrants are taken into account. We find that stable multi-adult household constellations did not gain in income from migration during the 1980s. In addition, we find no strong indications of selection bias in the income equation. / digitalisering@umu

Thesis (Ph.D.) -- La Trobe University, 2004. Submitted to the School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 283-294). Also available via the World Wide Web.

Mémoire (M.E.S.R.)--Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 1998. / Bibliogr.: f. 132-143. Document électronique également accessible en format PDF. CaQCU

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Hannover, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 483-505).

No description available.

The research on natives’ attitudes regarding immigration has increased during the past decades. The overall findings question the common theory of labor market competition and that native attitudes are affected by personal economic considerations. In the same time an increased concern in the political debate has become immigration. In many countries, there is a growth and progress of political parties with a far-right orientation that disapproves and attempts to prevent immigration. We examine data on attitudes towards immigration from eight rounds of the European social survey (ESS) which covers the years between 2002-2016. We study if the attitudes in Europe towards immigration from poor non-member countries of the European Union have changed during the 21th century and examine if the massive acceleration of refugee applications during the refugee crisis in 2015 has had an impact on the attitudes towards immigration. We estimate different models to examine how different factors are associated with individuals' attitudes towards immigration. Furthermore, we test if the labor market competition model holds for the seventh round of ESS due to limitation in data. We find that natives’ attitudes have not become worse in Europe, and that the refugee crisis in 2015 has not made the attitudes worse. We find that the factors that are associated with individual attitudes towards immigration are to a large degree connected with cultural values and beliefs, and that individuals with more years of schooling are more likely to favor immigration regardless of where the immigrants come from. These findings are consistent with the growing body of empirical findings that considers that cultural values and believes are the main drivers of attitudes towards immigration, and that actual effects of immigration on income and employment are quite small. These findings put the labor market competition premise in forming immigration attitudes into question.

Esta dissertação é composta por dois ensaios sobre economia da saúde. O primeiro ensaio tem como objetivo analisar o ambiente regulatório no mercado de medicamentos para doenças raras. Essas doenças são caracterizadas por afetar um pequeno número de indivíduos em uma determinada população e por serem crônicas, progressivas, degenerativas, 80% são de origem genética, 50% afetam as crianças, das quais 30% morrem antes dos 5 anos de idade. Elas representam risco de morte e um custo socioeconômico alto para o paciente e sua família. Devido à raridade, a indústria farmacêutica tem não demonstra interesse em desenvolver novos medicamentos órfãos. Apesar de individualmente raras, estima-se que o número de casos de alcançar 420 a 560 milhões de pessoas. Para a referida análise foi utilizado o modelo econômico desenvolvido por DeBrock (1985), que consiste na determinação simultânea de esforço de inovação e extensão de patentes, estabelecendo a trajetória ótima de proteção como resultado de um jogo não cooperativo entre o regulador e a empresa inovadora. Foram identificados individualmente os principais incentivos e instrumentos de regulação econômica. Eles são compostos por assistência à protocolos, procedimento centralizado de análise, reduções de taxas, o acesso de pesquisa financiado e exclusividade de mercado. Conclui-se que o instrumento regulatório mais importante foi a exclusividade de mercado, pois garante lucros extraordinários para a empresa inovadora, tornando o desenvolvimento de novas drogas tornou-se economicamente viável. No entanto, ressalta-se que todos os mecanismos tem um papel importante no sistema de incentivos e que cada um deles deve ser considerado para o desenvolvimento de políticas públicas para doenças raras. O segundo ensaio tem como objetivo medir o impacto do Diabete Melito nos rendimentos dos trabalhadores brasileiros no ano de 2008. Essa doença é caracterizada pelo elevado nível de glicose no sangue, problema que pode desencadear desencadeia má cicatrização, ataque cardíaco, acidente vascular cerebral, insuficiência renal, problemas de visão e amputação de membros. Dados do Ministério da Saúde indicam que, no Brasil, em 2010, havia cerca de 10 milhões de casos da doença, sendo a quarta principal causa de morte no país. Dados da WHO estimam que a prevalência da doença no Brasil é de 10,2% da população, cerca de 20 milhões de pessoas. A hipótese a ser testada é que o estado de saúde interfere nos rendimentos por meio de três mecanismos distintos: (i) na decisão de participar no mercado de trabalho, mensurado por meio de um Probit binário, (ii) na quantidade de horas trabalhadas e (iii) a produtividade por hora, ambos mensurados por meio do método de dois estágios de Heckman. Cada modelo é estimado separadamente para indivíduos com e sem doenças, sendo tomada a diferença do valor esperado de ambos para capturar o efeito contrafactual. Os resultados obtidos indicaram a existência de perdas progressivas, que incidem com maior intensidade entre a população feminina e que, no agregado, podem chegar ao valor de R$ 8.064.408.441.99 (USD 3.450.709.518,02 e EUR 2.490.436.905,56), correspondendo a cerca de 0,54% dos rendimentos totais e 0,20% do PIB do referido ano. Concluiu-se que o Diabete Melito gera perdas significativas na renda dos trabalhadores brasileiros, especialmente em relação à sua participação no mercado de trabalho. Os resultados indicam que as políticas públicas devem ser direcionadas para a prevenção da doença, uma vez que o desenvolvimento de comorbidades amplifica o efeito de perdas. Por fim, visando a manter a inter-relação entre os temas e a estabelecer a unidade do trabalho, foram abordadas na última seção as conclusões a respeito da dissertação. / This dissertation consists of two essays on health economics. The aim of the first essay is to analyze the regulatory environment for medicinal products for rare diseases. These diseases are characterized by to affect a small number of individuals in a given population and to be chronic, progressive, degenerative, 80% are genetic in origin, 50% affect children, of which 30% die before the age of 5. They represent death risk and a high socioeconomic cost to the patient and his family. Due to the rarity, pharmaceutical industry has not shown interest in developing new orphan drugs. Although individually rare, estimatives show that the number of cases to reach 420 million to 560 million people. For this analysis the economic model developed by DeBrock (1985), which consists of the simultaneous determination of innovation effort and extension of patents, establishing the optimal path protection as a result of a non-cooperative game between the regulator and the innovator was used. The main incentives and instruments of economic regulation were individually identified. They are protocols assistance, centralized analysis procedure, fee reductions, access to funded research and market exclusivity. We conclude that the most important regulatory tool was market exclusivity, because it ensures extraordinary profits for the innovator, making the development of new drugs become economically viable. However, it is noteworthy that all the mechanisms have an important role in the incentive system and that each of them should be considered for the development of public policies for rare diseases. The second essay aims to measure the impact of diabetes mellitus on the income of Brazilian workers in 2008. The main disease characteristic is high blood glucose, a problem that can trigger scarring troubles, heart attack, stroke, failure kidney, vision problems and limbs amputation. Ministry of Health data indicate that, in Brazil, in 2010, there were about 10 million cases of the disease, making it the fourth leading cause of death in the country. WHO data estimate that the disease prevalence is 10.2% of the Brazilian population, about 20 million people. The hypothesis to be tested is that the health status interfere in worker income through three distinct mechanisms: (i) in the decision to participate in the labor market, measured by means of a binary Probit, (ii) in the amount of hours worked and (iii) in the productivity per hour, both measured by the Heckman two-stage method. Each model is estimated separately for individuals with and without disease, and taking the difference of the expected value of both to capture the counterfactual effect. The results indicated the existence of progressive losses, which focus more strongly among women and that, in the aggregate, may reach R$ 8.064.408.441.99 (3,450,709,518.02 USD and EUR 2,490,436,905, 56), corresponding to about 0.54% of the total income and 0.20% of GDP in that year. It was concluded that diabetes mellitus causes significant losses in Brazilian workers income, especially in relation to their participation in the labor market. The results indicate that public policies should be directed to the prevention of disease, since the development of comorbidities amplifies the losses effect. Finally, to keep the inter-relationship between the issues and to establish the unity of the work, have been addressed in the last section the conclusions regarding the dissertation.