Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:32:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Ana Lucia Magano Henriques.pdf: 3712658 bytes, checksum: 881efbf8b68d9775831bbd1ef69257a6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-03-09 / This research has the critics and revision that are being proposed to the Law school as its tool. Its objective is the teacher's conception, what they think about such critics and innovation. That way, this essay tries to understand the process of appropriation of academic knowledge in the jurisdiction of Law; inquiry if this knowledge is the result of a dialog of science and social reality, materialized in the economical politics and educational guidelines, and what are its interests and such dialog has supported and directed the Law school. Through this essay I also intend to detail which is the knowledge in law that the reality demands nowadays. While writing I researched what is the origin and development of the Law School and how it reflects in the history of our country and also what were the guidelines adopted in the academic life. Great names in Academics were interviewed and such interviews were supported by a written study that involved the areas of Law school and the teacher's development. Considering the data that resulted from such interviews and based on the theory adopted as a reference there are some propositions that can be used o face and overcome the issues presented. Among them we point out the proposal of adopting the pedagogical pratices that urges the sense of curiosity as this one inspires reflexation and shows itself loose as it allows and stimulates the student to be the leader of its own development. In this kind of method we don't waste the knowledge shared by the student and such knowledge is used as a starting point (or link) to the knowledge of Law. The teachers' attitude that becomes aware of the acquisition of such knowledge rejects the dogmatic knowledge so called arrogant by the interviewed teachers. From these reflections my intention is to contribute to the formation of more critic professionals of Law capable of acting in an effective and transforming way in this reality that we live in. / A presente pesquisa tem como problema as cr?ticas e as propostas de revis?o que est?o sendo feitas ao ensino do Direito. Tem como seu objeto as concep??es de professores da ?rea, ou seja, o que pensam eles sobre tais cr?ticas e inova??es. Dessa forma, o presente trabalho busca compreender o processo de apropria??o do conhecimento acad?mico na ?rea do Direito, inquirir se esse saber resulta do di?logo entre ci?ncia e realidade social e quais interesses, consubstanciados nas pol?ticas econ?micas e educacionais, t?m embasado e direcionado o ensino do Direito. Tem como objetivo, ainda, evidenciar qual seja o saber jur?dico que a realidade atual exige. No seu desenvolvimento, comportou revis?o bibliogr?fica sobre a origem e o desenvolvimento do ensino jur?dico e como este reflete a hist?ria do pa?s e as pol?ticas adotadas no ensino superior. Sustentadas por revis?o bibliogr?fica que abrangeu as ?reas do ensino jur?dico e da forma??o docente, entrevistas semi-estruturadas foram realizadas junto a professores de grande express?o na ?rea do Direito. A partir da an?lise dos dados obtidos e com suporte nos referenciais te?ricos adotados, apresentam-se algumas proposi??es para o enfrentamento e supera??o dos problemas apontados. Dentre elas, destacamos a proposta de ado??o de pr?tica pedag?gica que instigue a curiosidade epistemol?gica, pois esta provoca reflex?o e se revela emancipat?ria uma vez que permite e estimula o discente a ser sujeito da sua pr?pria forma??o. Nesse tipo de pr?tica n?o se desperdi?a o conhecimento trazido pelo estudante; o conhecimento que traz ? usado como ponto de partida (ou ponte de travessia) para o conhecimento jur?dico. A atitude docente que se conscientiza da import?ncia da aquisi??o de conhecimento contextualizado rejeita o conhecimento dogm?tico, chamado de arrogante pelos professores entrevistados. A partir dessas reflex?es, o que se almeja ? contribuir para a forma??o de profissionais do Direito mais cr?ticos e aptos a atuar de forma efetiva e transformadora sobre a realidade na qual se inserem.