Det övergripande syftet med studien var att undersöka hur personalen på en psykiatrisk mottagning upplevde den behandling som de ger för borderline personlighetsstörning, mentaliseringsbaserad terapi. Genom en kvalitativ metod och fokusgrupper söktes svar på frågeställningarna. Det empiriska materialet analyserades med hjälp av tematisk analys och resultatet visade att behandlingen generellt upplevdes ha förbättrat patienternas livskvalitet. De flesta av patienterna gjorde helt andra livsval efter avslutad behandling och en del uppfyllde inte längre de diagnostiska kriterierna för borderline personlighetsstörning. De som hade fullföljt behandlingen eller nästan fullföljt den var de som hade dragit mest nytta av den. De faktorer som ansågs som viktiga för förändringsprocessen rörde individvariabler, strukturella faktorer, gruppterapi, medicinering med psykofarmaka och personalvariabler. De berörde med andra ord behandlingens form snarare än de specifika interventionerna för mentaliseringsbaserad terapi. De fynd som gjorts inom ramen för denna studie skulle därmed kunna betraktas som viktiga komponenter för psykoterapeutisk behandling av borderline personlighetsstörning oavsett tillhörighet av psykoterapeutisk skolbildning. Resultatet skulle kunna indikera att de specifika behandlingsinterventionerna inte har någon nämnvärd effekt samtidigt som det skulle kunna tyda på att en behandling som ges i samma form som MBT, men med andra interventioner, skulle kunna åstadkomma ett än bättre resultat. / The overall purpose of this study was to examine how the professionals on a psychiatric clinic experienced the treatment they are using for borderline personality disorder, mentalization-based treatment. Through a qualitative approach and focus groups, answers to the questions were sought. The empirical material was analyzed by using thematic analysis and the results showed that the treatment generally had improved the patients’ quality of life, as perceived by the professionals. Most of the patients did completely different choices in life after the treatment was finished and some of them did no longer fulfill the diagnostic criteria’s for borderline personality disorder. Those who almost or fully completed the treatment where the ones who have had the most use of it. Important factors for the process of change were individual variables, structural factors, group therapy, medication with psychopharmacological drugs and personnel variables. In other words factors related to the structure of the treatment rather than the specific interventions for mentalization-based treatment. The findings within the scope of this study could hence be considered as vital components for psychotherapeutic treatment of borderline personality disorder independent of psychotherapeutic doctrine. The result could indicate that the specific treatment interventions do not have any significant effect but at the same time it could indicate that a treatment given in the same form as mentalization-based treatment, but with other interventions, could give an even better result.

Introduction: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is characterised by deficits in affect and impulse regulation, along with interpersonal difficulties (Lieb et al., 2004). It is thought to develop through a complex relationship between adverse childhood events, such as childhood abuse and genetics. A recent developmental model of BPD and one that is gaining popularity focuses on mentalization. Following their exposition of the mentalizing model of BPD, Bateman and Fonagy developed the Mentalization Based Treatment (MBT) intervention for BPD (Bateman & Fonagy 2006). This intervention includes both group and individual therapy with the focus on the patient’s relationship with the therapist and other members of the group. Promising evidence that MBT interventions are effective for treating symptoms of BPD is beginning to emerge. Methods: First a systematic review examining the prevalence of childhood abuse in BPD patients was conducted. Second, an empirical study of the efficacy of a group-only adaptation of the MBT intervention for BPD, delivered in a routine health service setting. Finally, planned exploratory analyses were conducted in order to ascertain what factors might predict group completion. Results: The results of the systematic review suggested that that emotional abuse (mean prevalence 63%) and emotional neglect (mean prevalence 63.1%) are the most common forms of abuse reported by this population followed by physical neglect (mean prevalence 40.89%) , sexual abuse (mean prevalence 36.9%) and physical abuse (mean prevalence 32.49%). The results of the second study revealed that the HUB is an acceptable treatment to participants, with indicators of treatment efficacy in relation to reducing overall psychiatric symptoms along with specific symptoms including interpersonal sensitivities, depression, phobic anxiety and paranoid ideation. Finally, exploratory analyses suggested that patients who were older and with less histrionic symptoms (as defined by the Personality Disorder Questionnaire-4) were more likely to complete the HUB. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that a group-only MBT intervention displays promising effectiveness in treating core symptoms of BPD and is acceptable to patients. Further it suggests that group-only MBT interventions are worth continued investigation both into their efficacies and the potential efficiencies associated a group-based intervention.