This research shows that worst-case methane-air detonation loading on coal mine seals could be more severe than the design loads required by federal regulations, and therefore mine seals should be designed with sufficient ductility beyond the elastic regime. For this study, reinforced concrete mine seals were designed according to traditional protective structural design methods to meet the federal regulation requirements, and then the response to worst-case loads was analyzed in a single-degree-ofreedom model. Coal mine seals designed to resist the regulation loads elastically experienced support rotations up to 4.27 deg when analyzed with the worst-case loads. The analysis showed that coal mine seals designed to satisfy the federal regulations can survive worst-case methane-air detonations if they have sufficient ductility, but will undergo permanent, inelastic deformation.

Examination of seismic records during the time interval of the Sago Mine disaster in 2006 revealed a small amplitude signal possibly associated with an event in the mine. Although the epicenter of the signature was located in the vicinity where the explosion occurred, it could not be unequivocally attributed to the explosion. More needs to be understood about the seismicity from mine explosions in order to properly interpret critical seismic information. A seismic monitoring system located at NIOSH's Lake Lynn Experimental Mine has monitored nineteen experimental methane and dust based explosions. The objective of the study was to analyze seismic signatures generated by the methane and dust explosions to begin understanding their characteristics at different distances away from the source. The seismic signatures from these different events were analyzed using standard waveform analysis procedures in order to estimate the moment magnitude and radiated seismic energy. The procedures used to analyze the data were conducted using self-produced programs not available with existing commercial software. The signatures of the explosions were found to be extremely complex due a combination of mine geometry and experimental design, both of which could not be controlled for the purposes of the study. Geophones located approximately 600 m (1970 ft) and over from the source collected limited data because of the attenuation of the seismic waves generated by the methane explosion. A combination of the methods used to characterize the seismic signatures allowed for differentiation between experimental designs and the size of the explosion. The factors having the largest impact on the signatures were the mine geometry, size of the methane explosion, construction of the mine seal and location of the mine seal. A relationship was derived to correlate the radiated seismic energy to the size of the explosion. Recommendations were made, based upon the limitations of this study, on methods for better collection of seismic data in the future. / Ph. D.