¡@Including of HTML, client-side script, and other relative technology, Dynamic HTML (DHTML) is a mechanism of creating dynamic contents in a web page. Nowadays, because of the demand of dynamic web pages and the diffusion of web applications, attackers get a new, easily-spread, and hard-detected intrusion vector ¡Ð DHTML. And commercial anti-virus softwares, commonly using pattern-matching approach, still have weakness against commonly obfuscated malicious DHTML. ¡@According to this condition, we propose a new detective algorithm Model-based Reasoning (MoBR), basing on the respects of model and reasoning, that is resilient to common obfuscations used by attackers and can correctly determine whether a webpage is malicious or not. Through describing text and semantic signatures, we constructs the model of a malicious DHTML by the mechanism of templates. Experimental evaluation by actual DHTML demonstrates that our detection algorithm is tolerant to obfuscation and perform much superior to commercial anti-virus softwares. Furthermore, it can detect variants of malicious DHTML with a low false positive rate.

Formal verification by model checking verifies whether a system satisfies some given correctness properties, and is intractable in general. We focus on several problems originating from the usage of model checking and from the inherent complexity of model checking itself. We propose approximation and iterative refinement techniques and demonstrate that they help in making these problems tractable on practical cases. Vacuity detection is one of the problems, relating to the trivial satisfaction of properties. A similar problem is query solving, useful in model exploration, when properties of a system are not fully known and are to be discovered rather than checked. Both of these problems have solution spaces structured as lattices and can be solved by model checking using those lattices. The lattices, in the most general formulation of these problems, are too complex to be implemented efficiently. We introduce a general approximation framework for model checking with lattices and instantiate this framework for the two problems, leading to algorithms and implementations that can obtain efficiently partial answers to the problems. We also introduce refinement techniques that consider incrementally larger lattices and compute even the partial answers gradually, to further abate the size explosion of the problems. Another problem we consider is the state-space explosion of model checking. The size of system models is exponential in the number of state variables and that renders model checking intractable. We consider systems composed of several components running concurrently. For such systems, compositional verification checks components individually to avoid composing an entire system. Model checking an individual component uses assumptions about the other components. Smaller assumptions lead to smaller verification problems. We introduce iterative refinement techniques that improve the assumptions generated by previous automated approaches. One technique incrementally refines the interfaces between components in order to obtain smaller assumptions that are sufficient to prove a given property. The smaller assumptions are approximations of the assumption that would be obtained without our interface refinement. Another technique computes assumptions as abstractions of components, as an alternative to current approaches that learn assumptions from counterexamples. Our abstraction refinement has the potential to compute smaller nondeterministic assumptions, in contrast to the deterministic assumptions learned by current approaches. We confirm experimentally the benefits of our new approximation and refinement techniques.

Formal verification by model checking verifies whether a system satisfies some given correctness properties, and is intractable in general. We focus on several problems originating from the usage of model checking and from the inherent complexity of model checking itself. We propose approximation and iterative refinement techniques and demonstrate that they help in making these problems tractable on practical cases. Vacuity detection is one of the problems, relating to the trivial satisfaction of properties. A similar problem is query solving, useful in model exploration, when properties of a system are not fully known and are to be discovered rather than checked. Both of these problems have solution spaces structured as lattices and can be solved by model checking using those lattices. The lattices, in the most general formulation of these problems, are too complex to be implemented efficiently. We introduce a general approximation framework for model checking with lattices and instantiate this framework for the two problems, leading to algorithms and implementations that can obtain efficiently partial answers to the problems. We also introduce refinement techniques that consider incrementally larger lattices and compute even the partial answers gradually, to further abate the size explosion of the problems. Another problem we consider is the state-space explosion of model checking. The size of system models is exponential in the number of state variables and that renders model checking intractable. We consider systems composed of several components running concurrently. For such systems, compositional verification checks components individually to avoid composing an entire system. Model checking an individual component uses assumptions about the other components. Smaller assumptions lead to smaller verification problems. We introduce iterative refinement techniques that improve the assumptions generated by previous automated approaches. One technique incrementally refines the interfaces between components in order to obtain smaller assumptions that are sufficient to prove a given property. The smaller assumptions are approximations of the assumption that would be obtained without our interface refinement. Another technique computes assumptions as abstractions of components, as an alternative to current approaches that learn assumptions from counterexamples. Our abstraction refinement has the potential to compute smaller nondeterministic assumptions, in contrast to the deterministic assumptions learned by current approaches. We confirm experimentally the benefits of our new approximation and refinement techniques.

La responsabilité des routeurs s'engage lorsque les machines hôtes envoient leurs paquets dans le réseau. Les routeurs auront donc la fonction de transmettre ces paquets sur les liens pour les acheminer vers la destination déterminée. Cependant, comme le routeur traite les paquets séparément, la performance du routeur dépend donc du temps de traitement pour chaque paquet. Avec une charge de trafic, il est possible d'optimiser efficacement le traitement des paquets dans le routeur. Notre attention sera portée sur l'évaluation du délai de bout-en-bout dans le réseau End-to-End. Ce mémoire propose donc un modèle qui consiste à évaluer et vérifier les délais des paquets dans les routeurs par la méthode de vérification de modèles (Model-Checking). ______________________________________________________________________________ MOTS-CLÉS DE L’AUTEUR : vérification de modèles, Model-Checking, réseaux, routeur, délai.

The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a standard language adopted by the Object Management Group (OMG) for writing object-oriented (OO) descriptions of software systems. UML allows the analyst to add class-level and system-level constraints. However, UML does not describe how to check the correctness of these constraints. Recent studies have shown that Symbolic Model Checking can effectively verify large software specifications. In this thesis, we investigate how to use model checking to verify constraints of UML specifications. We describe the process of specifying, translating and verifying UML specifications for an elevator example. We use the Cadence Symbolic Model Verifier (SMV) to verify the system properties. We demonstrate how to write a UML specification that can be easily translated to SMV. We propose a set of rules and guidelines to translate UML specifications to SMV, and then use these to translate a non-trivial UML elevator specification to SMV. We look at errors detected throughout the specification, translation and verification process, to see how well they reveal errors, ambiguities and omissions in the user requirements.

The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a standard language adopted by the Object Management Group (OMG) for writing object-oriented (OO) descriptions of software systems. UML allows the analyst to add class-level and system-level constraints. However, UML does not describe how to check the correctness of these constraints. Recent studies have shown that Symbolic Model Checking can effectively verify large software specifications. In this thesis, we investigate how to use model checking to verify constraints of UML specifications. We describe the process of specifying, translating and verifying UML specifications for an elevator example. We use the Cadence Symbolic Model Verifier (SMV) to verify the system properties. We demonstrate how to write a UML specification that can be easily translated to SMV. We propose a set of rules and guidelines to translate UML specifications to SMV, and then use these to translate a non-trivial UML elevator specification to SMV. We look at errors detected throughout the specification, translation and verification process, to see how well they reveal errors, ambiguities and omissions in the user requirements.

Pipelined circuits operate as an assembly line that starts processing new instructions while older ones continue execution. Control properties specify the correct behaviour of the pipeline with respect to how it handles the concurrency between instructions. Control properties stand out as one of the most challenging aspects of pipelined circuit verification. Their verification depends on the datapath and memories, which in practice account for the largest part of the state space of the circuit. To alleviate the state explosion problem, abstraction of memories and datapath becomes mandatory. This thesis provides a methodology for an efficient abstraction of the datapath under all possible control-visible behaviours. For verification of control properties, the abstracted datapath is then substituted in place of the original one and the control circuitry is left unchanged. With respect to control properties, the abstraction is shown conservative by both language containment and simulation. For verification of control properties, the pipeline datapath is represented by a network of registers, unrestricted combinational datapath blocks and muxes. The values flowing through the datapath are called parcels. The control is the state machine that steers the parcels through the network. As parcels travel through the pipeline, they undergo transformations through the datapath blocks. The control- visible results of these transformations fan-out into control variables which in turn influence the next stage the parcels are transferred to by the control. The semantics of the datapath is formalized as a labelled transition system called a parcel automaton. Parcel automata capture the set of all control visible paths through the pipeline and are derived without the need of reachability analysis of the original pipeline. Datapath abstraction is defined using familiar concepts such as language containment or simulation. We have proved results that show that datapath abstraction leads to pipeline abstraction. Our approach has been incorporated into a practical algorithm that yields directly the abstract parcel automaton, bypassing the construction of the concrete parcel automaton. The algorithm uses a SAT solver to generate incrementally all possible control visible behaviours of the pipeline datapath. Our largest case study is a 32-bit two-wide superscalar OpenRISC microprocessor written in VHDL, where it reduced the size of the implementation from 35k gates to 2k gates in less than 10 minutes while using less than 52MB of memory.

Telecommunication systems are structured to enable incremental growth, so that new telecommunication features can be added to the set of existing features. With the addition of more features, certain existing features may exhibit unpredictable behaviour. This is known as the feature interaction problem, and it is very old problem in telecommunication systems. Jackson and Zave have proposed a technology, Distributed Feature Composition (DFC) to manage the feature interaction problem. DFC is a pipe-and-filter-like architecture where features are "filters" and communication channels connecting features are "pipes". DFC does not prescribe how features are specified or programmed. Instead, Zave and Jackson have developed BoxTalk, a call-abstraction, domain-specific, high-level programming language for programming features. BoxTalk is based on the DFC protocol and it uses macros to combine common sequences of read and write actions, thus simplifying the details of the DFC protocol in feature models. BoxTalk features must adhere to the DFC protocol in order to be plugged into a DFC architecture (i.e., features must be "DFC compliant"). We want to use model checking to check whether a feature is DFC compliant. We express DFC compliance using a set of properties expressed as linear temporal logic formulas. To use the model checker SPIN, BoxTalk features must be translated into Promela. Our automatic verification process comprises three steps: 1. Explicate BoxTalk features by expanding macros and introducing implicit details. 2. Mechanically translate explicated BoxTalk features into Promela models. 3. Verify the Promela models of features using the SPIN model checker. We present a case study of BoxTalk features, describing the original features and how they are explicated and translated into Promela by our software, and how they are proven to be DFC compliant.

Due to the continued development of Internet technology, more and more people are willing to take advantage of high-interaction and diverse web applications to deal with commercial, knowledge-sharing, and social activities. However, while web applications deeply affect our society by degrees, hackers start exploiting web application vulnerabilities to attack innocent end user and back-end database, and therefore pose significant threat in information security. According to this situation, this paper proposes a detection mechanism based on Model Checking to detect web application vulnerabilities. We reduce the problem whether the vulnerabilities exist or not to a kind of SMT (Satisfiability Modulo Theories) problem, and analyze all of the traces of tainted data flow in web applications to find possible vulnerabilities by SMT solver. The experimental results show that the method we proposed can identify SQL injection and XSS vulnerabilities effectively, and prove our method is a feasible way to find web application vulnerabilities.

Zugl.: Bremen, Univ., Diss., 2009