1 |
A comparative analysis of the objectivity of essay and multiple-choice items in informal testing.Harreld, Jerry Douglas. January 1970 (has links)
Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Tulsa, 1970. / Bibliography: leaves 54-56.
|
2 |
Comparing 12 finite state models of examinee performance on multiple-choice tests /Zin, Than Than, January 1992 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1992. / Vita. Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 94-96). Also available via the Internet.
|
3 |
Reliability and validity of multiple choice examinations as a function of the number of options per item and student ability /Trevisan, Michael S., January 1990 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1990. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [83]-85).
|
4 |
Chance successes and the reliability of testsGlass, Gene V, January 1963 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1963. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 49-51).
|
5 |
Effects of feedback in computer-administered multiple-choice testing procedure and paper-and-pencil testing procedureLeung, Man-tak. January 1984 (has links)
Thesis (M.Ed.)--University of Hong Kong, 1984. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 68-74). Also available in print.
|
6 |
A New Approach to Measurement of Partial KnowledgeWagner, David E. 08 1900 (has links)
The problem of this study is that of developing a testing procedure for multiple-choice tests which would increase the relationship between test scores and a criterion. The procedure investigated in this research was one in which subjects took a multiple-choice test but were required to continue responding on each item until the correct answer was obtained. The total number of responses was used as the score on the test. The purpose of this research was to investigate the possibility of increasing predictability by changing the procedure of administering the test, rather than changing the test itself.
|
7 |
Taking a WebCT QuizTittenberger, Peter, Schor, Dario 17 January 2006 (has links)
After viewing this interactive tutorial a user will be able to login into WebCT 4 and will be able to take a multiple choice quiz.
|
8 |
Taking a WebCT QuizTittenberger, Peter, Schor, Dario 17 January 2006 (has links)
After viewing this interactive tutorial a user will be able to login into WebCT 4 and will be able to take a multiple choice quiz.
|
9 |
A study of strategy of response to multiple choice test items in general scienceShearman, K. Stewart January 1964 (has links)
In this study, a technique was developed for classifying the manner in which testees came to choose their responses to multiple choice items on a test of Science 20. One hundred thirty-one students enrolled in Science 20 at Alpha Junior Secondary School in School District # 41 (Burnaby) took part in the investigation. The sample comprised five sections taught by two teachers.
The aim of the study was to determine if a distinguishable response choice strategy existed for the test under study. The pupils were asked to classify their response choice behaviour into 4 categories: guessing, elimination and guessing, recall, and reasoning. The responses were separated into groups of successful and unsuccessful testees on each of the 60 items of the test.
The question was asked:
Do successful testees show different response choice behaviour from unsuccessful ones?
The hypothesis was tested for each of the 60 items. On 33 of these items, the response choice behaviour of successful testees differed from unsuccessful ones at or above the 95% confidence level.
The strategy of response choice appeared to be to try to recall the answer first, and if this was not possible, to rely on reasoning, elimination and guessing, and guessing in that order.
Three factors; achievement, difficulty level, and discriminating power; which might influence response choice behaviour were investigated. The results were inconclusive. / Education, Faculty of / Graduate
|
10 |
Hodnocení testových úloh z teorie paraglidingu pro uchazeče o pilotní licenci / Evaluation of paragliding theory test items for pilot license applicantsŠťastná, Johana January 2011 (has links)
EVALUATION OF PARAGLIDING THEORY TEST ITEMS FOR PILOT LICENSE APPLICANTS Objectives: The aim of this work is to evaluate and optimize a set of paragliding the theoretical items appropriate for testing pilot license applicants of LAA ČR. Methods: This aim is realized by means of the theory of testing. Basic methods of testing form the background research of this work. The items were de- signed as multiple-choice, to select one correct answer. These items were assigned to the applicants for pilot licenses and were evaluated by the apparatus of testing. Microsoft Excel 2003 was used for collecting data and results evaluation. The computation according to the formulas in the theoretical part was performed in Matlab 2007b. Based on this analysis, the results were presented and optimization of these items was proposed. Results: Three hypotheses were examined in this work. The first dealt with a rela- tion between evaluated difficulty of test items and their points value, which was assigned by the LAA ČR. The second hypothesis concerned the number of used distractors. The third hypothesis was focused on the sensitivity of the items. The evaluated difficulty of test items matched items point value in 26 % of the number of items. 92 % of the alterna- tives were used and sufficient sensitivity had 78 % of...
|
Page generated in 0.0523 seconds