Dans le cadre de cette étude, nous proposons d’analyser la langue militaire et particulièrementcelle de l’armée de Terre. Dans un premier temps, nous traitons de la terminologie, de lalangue militaire technique par rapport à la langue générale et d’un aperçu des dictionnaires despécialité et glossaires de la Défense. Dans une deuxième partie, nous nous appuyons sur lanotion des classes d’objets, instaurées par G. GROSS, qui demeure la meilleure méthoded’analyse de la langue militaire en étudiant les propriétés syntaxiques des prédicats nominauxd’action, les verbes supports et appropriés et leur actualisation. Pour illustrer et approfondirnotre travail, nous nous basons sur les actions des militaires en préparation d’une opération,pendant la projection et à l’issue de l’engagement. Par ces actions, nous démontrons toutes lespropriétés syntaxiques et sémantiques spécifiques à chaque classe de prédicats. La troisièmepartie, consacrée aux arguments de type humain, inanimé concret et locatif, est la suitelogique de l’étude des classes d’objets. Avec cette thèse, nous possédons tous les élémentspour envisager, par exemple une étude contrastive avec une autre langue et surtout grâce auxanalyses, la création d’un dictionnaire bilingue. / Within the framework of this study, we propose to analyse military language and particularlythat of the army. In part One, we deal with terminology, technical military language inrelation to everyday language as well as a survey of Defense-related specialized dictionariesand glossaries. In part Two, we take our cue from G. GROSS’s concept of object classes,which remains the best way of approaching military language specifically action-orientednominal predicates’syntactical properties, and support and appropriate verbs. We drew ourexamples from military action during fieldwork, both home and abroad, and upon the returnhome. Making use of these three phases, we outline syntactical and semantic propertiesspecific to each class of predicates. Part Three is devoted to arguments of three types : human,inanimate and locative ; it follows logically upon our analysis of object classes. Thisdissertation will help us carry out a contrastive analysis with another language as well as thecreation of a bilingual dictionary.

Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T18:55:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Vicente.pdf: 540780 bytes, checksum: 804984f295882304087aae116e2676f5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-03-20 / The aim of this research is to investigate the modalization role of the nominal predicate in thematic position from the analysis of textual portions at phrasal level, taken from texts produced by candidates to Unioeste entrance examination, in 2004. The interest in promoting an analysis in this context reflects an attempt to contribute, yet minimally, with the teaching of Portuguese, considering that the writing activities at high school aim to prepare the students linguistic-discursive abilities for the text production at the entrance examination. During the route traced for the development of this work, we tried to demonstrate that the unity nominal predicate + subject represents a structure of asseverative content from which the text producer exposes value judgments. The thematic position is used as a parameter for the recognition, in the syntactic plan, of a specific type of semantic organization. The delimitation of a syntactic-semantic description conducted an evaluation that joins the thematic position and the modalization content activated by the nominal predicate. For this reason, Halliday´s (1985) theory, based on the thematic structure of the clause, and the studies on modalization made by authors like Parret (1988), Castilho and Castilho (1992), Neves (1996), among others, support the hypothesis that the nominal predicate, when placed before the subject, plays a modalization role. The analysis carried out resulted in the recognition of a relationship between the nominal predicate and the propositional content exposed inside the subject. In this sense, the classification proposed in this work, although limited, summarizes the interpretation derived from comparisons and contrasts of the relationship PN + subject . / O objetivo desta pesquisa consiste em investigar o papel modalizador do predicado nominal em posição temática a partir da análise de recortes de nível frasal retirados de redações produzidas por candidatos ao vestibular da Unioeste em 2004. O interesse em promover uma análise neste contexto reflete uma tentativa de contribuir, mesmo que minimamente, com o ensino de língua portuguesa, considerando-se que atividades de escrita no ensino médio visam ao preparo de habilidades lingüístico-discursivas dos alunos para a produção da redação de vestibular. Durante o percurso traçado para o desenvolvimento deste trabalho, buscou-se demonstrar que a unidade predicado nominal + sujeito representa uma estrutura de teor asseverativo a partir da qual o produtor do texto expõe juízos de valor. A posição temática do predicado nominal serve de parâmetro para o reconhecimento, no plano sintático, de um tipo específico de organização semântica. O enfoque na descrição sintático-semântica acenou para uma avaliação que concilia a posição temática e o teor de modalização acionado pelo predicado nominal. Para tanto, a proposta de Halliday (1985), pautada na estrutura temática da oração, e os estudos sobre modalização realizados por autores como Parret (1988), Castilho e Castilho (1992), Neves (1996), entre outros, subsidiam a hipótese de que o predicado nominal, quando anteposto ao sujeito, possui caráter modalizador. A análise empreendida resultou no reconhecimento de que há uma relação entre o predicado nominal e o teor proposicional exposto no interior do sujeito. Nesse sentido, a proposta de classificação em foco, embora limitada, resume a interpretação obtida por meio de cotejos e contrastes da relação PN + sujeito .

Menée dans une perspective comparative, cette recherche a pour ambition une description du lexique des noms d’affect dans le but de relever des zones convergentes et des zones divergentes dans deux langues apparentées généalogiquement – le français et le roumain - selon deux axes de réflexion : l’analyse diachronique de la dynamique de l’évolution du lexique affectif roumain imprégné de mots d’origine française et l’analyse synchronique des particularités combinatoires des noms d’affect. Une telle recherche a mis en évidence des cas très intéressants, des points où les deux systèmes se rapprochent, sans pour autant coïncider totalement. Mais, malgré les petites différences morphosyntaxiques et combinatoires spécifiques attestées dans l’expression des affects, ces derniers présentent globalement une homogénéité du fonctionnement linguistique. Ce fait n’est pas seulement intéressant en termes de syntaxe comparée, mais aussi par le fait que les noms d’affect qui réalisent le même scénario cognitif ont un comportement similaire dans les deux langues confrontées. / Conducted in a comparative perspective, this research aims to describe the lexicon of affect nouns in order to underline the converging areas and diverging areas in two genealogically related languages - French and Romanian - in two lines of thought: diachronic analysis concerning the dynamics of the evolution of the Romanian emotional vocabulary permeated with words of French origin and synchronic analysis of combinatorial features of affect nouns. Such research has highlighted some very interesting cases, the points where these two systems are similar, but not completely coincide. But despite the small specific morphosyntactic and combinatorial differences evidenced in the expression of emotions, they generally bear homogeneity of linguistic functioning. This fact is not only interesting in terms of comparative syntax, but also by the fact that the affect nouns performing the same cognitive scenario have similar behavior in both languages faced.