Spelling suggestions: "subject:"premultipliers"" "subject:"multipliers""
1 |
Full Scale Static Lateral Load Test of a 9 Pile Group in SandChristensen, Dustin Shaun 27 March 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Much research has been done to study the effects of spacing in laterally loaded pile groups and how the pile spacing affects lateral resistance of the piles. In this test a 9-pile group of steel piles was installed in a 3x3 configuration in sand. The piles were spaced from center-to-center at a distance of 5.65 pile diameters in the direction of the load. The pile group was laterally loaded and instrumented to collect deflection, load, and strain data. A separate single pile was similarly instrumented and tested for comparison to the pile group. The soil profile consisted of a top layer of sand about 2.5 meters deep underlain by alternating layers of fine grained soil and sand. Analysis was done in order to determine p-multipliers for the rows in the pile group. The pile group consistently resisted lower average loads than those of the single pile at the same peak deflection. Row 1 resisted equal loads to those resisted by the single pile but Row 2 and Row 3 resisted smaller loads successively. The maximum bending moments were greatest in Row 1 and decreased successively in Row 2 and Row 3, however they occurred at the same depth for the same peak deflection. Maximum bending moments for the single pile were similar to those for Row 1 in the pile group at each deflection. Group effects were more significant at greater loads with larger deflections. Higher deflection caused increased shear zone interaction and a decrease in lateral resistance. The test on the single pile was modeled using the computer program LPILE Plus version 4.0 (Reese et al., 2000). The soil profile was calibrated by alternating the input soil parameters until the curves matched between the measured and the calculated results. The new soil profile was then used to model the test on the pile group using GROUP version 4.0 (Reese and Wang, 1996). A match was made between the measured test results and those calculated using GROUP by defining p-multipliers for each of the rows. For Cycle 1 the p-multipliers were found to be 1.0, .55, and .5 for Row 1 through Row 3 respectively. For Cycle 10 the p-multipliers were found to be the same as those for Cycle 1.
|
2 |
Lateral Resistance of Piles Near Vertical MSE Abutment WallsHatch, Cody 01 December 2014 (has links) (PDF)
A full scale MSE wall was constructed and piles were driven at various distances behind the wall. Lateral load testing was conducted and the performance of the pile, wall, and reinforcement were measured. The piles were 12.75 inch pipe piles, and the wall was reinforced with welded wire grid reinforcement. The objective of the testing was to characterize the relationship between the lateral pile resistance and the distance of the pile behind the back face of the MSE wall. Load-displacement curves are presented for the piles located behind the wall at 66 inches (5.3 diameters), 55 inches (4.3 diameters), 41 inches (3.2 diameters), and 24 inches (1.9 diameters). The lateral resistance of the piles decreases as the spacing behind the wall decreases. The results of the testing have been matched in LPILE using p-multipliers to reduce the lateral resistance. A curve has been developed showing the variation of p-multiplier with normalized pile spacing behind the wall, including data from previous studies. The curve suggests that a p-multiplier of 1 (no reduction in lateral resistance) can be used when the normalized distance from the back face of the wall to the center of the pile is at least 4 pile diameters. The p-multiplier decreases relatively linearly for smaller spacings.
|
3 |
Full-Scale Lateral-Load Tests of a 3x5 Pile Group in Soft Clays and SiltsSnyder, Jeffrey L. 15 March 2004 (has links) (PDF)
A series of static lateral load tests were conducted on a group of fifteen piles arranged in a 3x5 pattern. The piles were placed at a center-to-center spacing of 3.92 pile diameters. A single isolated pile was also tested for comparison to the group response. The subsurface profile consisted of cohesive layers of soft to medium consistency underlain by interbedded layers of sands and fine-grained soils. The piles were instrumented to measure pile-head deflection, rotation, and load, as well as strain versus pile depth.
|
Page generated in 0.0358 seconds