1 |
The social context of participation participatory rural appraisal (PRA) and the creation of a marine protected area in Bahia, Brazil /Weigand, Ronaldo. January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Florida, 2003. / Title from title page of source document. Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
2 |
The application of a large group method for participation in rural development18 March 2015 (has links)
M.A. (Community Development) / Please refer to full text to view abstract
|
3 |
Local dynamics and external drivers of agro-ecological change in Southwestern EthiopiaHedtjärn Swaling, Julia January 2012 (has links)
While previous research on African smallholder agriculture has been criticized of focusing on the sole factor of population pressure as driver of agricultural degradation or intensification, the present study tries to nuance this debate by providing empirically grounded research, exploring the dynamics behind local agro-ecological change. The thesis specifically studies the dynamics behind small-scale farmers’ crop choices in relation to their management of trees in cropland in Gera District, Ethiopia. Drawing on situated landscape interviews and focus group discussions with farmers combined with observations and interviews with agriculture officials, a contextual understanding of local agro-ecological processes emerged. While political ecology was used as an overarching framework, the concept of landesque capital served as an analytical tool to explore how external and local forces interact at the point of the land management decision. It was found that external factors sometimes have a reinforcing effect at the local scale, but when top-down interventions are incoherent with bottom-up priorities, a conflict occurs. In this way, local dynamics and external drivers constitute an interacting dialectic, with a set of unintentional synergies and trade-offs eventually forming agro-ecological landscape change. / Examining mismatches between management and the supply of ecosystem services in Ethiopian agroecosystems across scales in space and time
|
4 |
Participatory strategies in income generation programmes for poor women in IndiaBhatt, Meenakshi Sanjeev. January 2004 (has links)
published_or_final_version / abstract / toc / Asian Studies / Master / Master of Philosophy
|
5 |
The social impact of microfinance: what changes in well-being are perceived by women group borrowers after obtaining a group loan? : A participatory rural appraisal in Dar es Salaam Region, Tanzaniade Goey, Heleen January 2012 (has links)
Worldwide, poverty remains to be an obstacle to achieve sustainable development and improve the well-being of people. Microfinance has become a popular tool for poverty alleviation and it can now be found in poor countries across the world. Microfinance is based on the principle that poor people can initiate their own development out of poverty, given they have the starting capital to do so. The capital can be invested in income-generating activities and it is assumed that this will lead to a higher income and additional positive effects, like an increase in well-being, will follow. However others argue that the focus on income is only one aspects of poverty, other forms of deprivation and constraints are excluded. This thesis aims to address how microfinance, the provision of credit in particular, has an influence on the well-being of women. A participatory rural appraisal was conducted in order to explore how women define well-being. The perspectives of four women groups from the urban and peri-urban areas of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were included in understanding the local definition of well-being, the developments in their lives and the changes in well-being they have perceived. The results show that the group loans may contribute to positive changes in the well-being of women, but these changes cannot be attributed to the loans alone. The changes in well-being caused by the loan intertwine with other factors like group dynamics and family life; therefore the results need to be interpreted considering the specific context. Furthermore the results show that the changes in well-being are not necessarily related to an increase in income, thus contesting the assumptions on which microfinance is based.
|
6 |
Rural women, poverty and social welfare programs in Indonesia /Purba, Rasita Ekawati. January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Western Australia, 2006.
|
7 |
Farmers ain't no fools exploring the role of participatory rural appraisal to access indigenous knowledge and enhance sustainable development research and planning : a case study of Dusun Pausan, Bali, Indonesia /Wickham, Trevor Wayne, January 1993 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Waterloo, 1993. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 191-211).
|
8 |
Sustentabilidade de uma propriedade rural de base ecológica : um estudo de caso no Sítio Oliveira em Rio Claro/SP / Sustainability of a farm with ecological production systems: a case study in Sítio Oliveira in Rio Claro/SPSasaki, Diana Leb 04 February 2011 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T18:57:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
3514.pdf: 2770120 bytes, checksum: 674d100e898f109b54e36fe202b7674c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011-02-04 / Most of the territorial space of a city is used for agricultural purposes like crops, livestock or forest and a considerable amount of ecological problems are related to such activities, which, as productive processes, are closely linked to the dynamics of ecosystems and certain social relationships of production. In agriculture, sustainability is a guiding element in the search for a new ethic in the relationship between man and nature. A major challenge for farmers and researchers is to know when an agroecosystems is healthy, how healthy is a system after conversion into an agroecological management and, more importantly, how to achieve a sustainable agroecosystem. Thus, studies that examine the sustainability of farms with ecological production systems, from the perspective of agroecology, through methodologies such as Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and Indicators of sustainability, are extremely important to verify the operation of these systems, their influence on the improvement of environmental resources and the dissemination and encouragement of more sustainable practices in food production and other products. In this study were used six tools of PRA: Semi-structured interview, Maps of the farm, Venn s Diagram, Agricultural Calendar with focus on gender, Commercial Flowchart and Problem Tree, which served as input for obtaining information with a high degree of relevance in the development of forty-four indicators of different dimensions of sustainability (environmental, socio-cultural and economic), which were grouped into four broad themes (Quality and use of land and water, Land use and conservation, Quality of life and Economic vulnerability). The Radar Chart made possible to plot the state of the elements of the ecosystem, promoting an integrated and systemic evaluation. There were an intense exchange of information and experiences in which the views of researchers and farmers complemented themselves and generated responses more suited to the local reality. / A maior parte do espaço territorial de um município é utilizada para propósitos agrícolas, sejam cultivos, criações ou florestas, e uma quantidade considerável dos problemas ecológicos são decorrentes dessas atividades, as quais, como processo produtivos, estão estreitamente vinculadas às dinâmicas dos ecossistemas e a determinadas relações sociais de produção. Na agricultura, a sustentabilidade é um elemento norteador na busca de uma nova ética na relação homem-natureza. Um grande desafio para agricultores e pesquisadores é saber quando um agroecossistema está saudável, o quanto saudável um sistema está depois da conversão para um manejo agroecológico e, mais ainda, como alcançar um agroecossistema sustentável. Desta forma, pesquisas que analisem a sustentabilidade de propriedades rurais de base ecológica, pela ótica da agroecologia, através de metodologias como o diagnóstico rural participativo (DRP) e indicadores de sustentabilidade, são de extrema importância para a verificação do funcionamento destes sistemas, a sua influência na melhora de recursos ambientais e para a difusão e estímulo de práticas mais ecológicas na produção de alimentos e outros produtos. No presente estudo foram utilizadas seis ferramentas do DRP: Entrevista Semiestruturada, Mapas da propriedade, Diagrama de Venn, Calendário Agrícola com enfoque em gênero, Fluxograma Comercial e Árvore de Problemas, que serviram como subsídio para a obtenção de informações com alto grau de relevância na elaboração de quarenta e quatro indicadores de sustentabilidade de diferentes dimensões (ambiental, sócio-cultural e econômica), que foram agrupados em quatro temas amplos (Qualidade e uso do solo e da água, Uso da terra e conservação, Qualidade de vida e Vulnerabilidade econômica). Através do Gráfico de Radar, pôde-se representar graficamente o estado dos elementos do agroecossistema, promovendo uma avaliação sistêmica e integrada dos indicadores. Houve uma intensa troca de informações e experiências no campo, nas quais os pontos de vista de pesquisadores e agricultores se complementaram e geraram respostas mais adaptadas a esta realidade local.
|
9 |
Sustainable rural development projects in Ficksburg Local MunicipalityMamotho, Mpho Benett January 2014 (has links)
The current study aimed to evaluation of a Rural Development project in this case the (Kabelo Trust), by evaluating the factors that contributes to its sustainability even though 70% of the members did not undergo high school education. Qualitative research methods was employed in gathering accurate information from the project members about the strategies that they are employing in sustaining the project while many government funded project does not last for even a year. The involvement of the stakeholders like Setsoto Local Municipality, the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, the role they played in the project was also explored. It was therefore suggested by the researcher that the main stakeholder which is the Department of Agriculture should assist the project in establishing market for products in other countries.
|
10 |
A participatory communication approach of rural cattle project: a case study of Nguni cattle project in the Eastern Cape, South AfricaUsadolo, Sam Erevbenagie January 2011 (has links)
project. It did this by reviewing relevant literature in development communication. The review done showed that literature is replete with arguments critical of the dominant paradigm due to its top-down nature of communication. Scholars critical of dominant paradigm argue that participatory communication should be given a prominent role to ensure that stakeholders work in concert to realise the stated objectives of their development project. The study highlighted many contentious issues surrounding the nature and practices of participatory communication. It pointed out that the issues have played themselves out in literature in the form of different typologies of participatory practices, which were dealt with extensively in this study. The discussion of participatory communication in literature is also mindful of different models of communication and the space they occupy in participatory communication practices. In this study, there was a discussion of transactional communication models as depicted by Nair and White (1993:52) and Steinberg (1997:19). Both scholars emphasise that participatory communication will not achieve its stated purpose without mutual agreement of the parties in communication. They equally stress the recognition of the possible effects of some contextual factors which may have bearing on the prevailing nature of communication. A review of different communication tools used by participatory development communicator was given in the study. These different communication tools were discussed in view of how these tools can be used to advance participatory practice in a development project, especially with reference to the project examined in this study. Using qualitative research method, different and appropriate interview methods such as semi-structured, focus group and post-survey interviews were used to collect data from the respondents in this study. The analysis and discussion of the data revealed that different challenges on the ground could affect participatory communication practices in a development project. With regard to the project examined in this study, the analysis showed that there is a weak stakeholder relationship, especially stakeholders identified in this study as field officers. The study highlighted that stakeholders such as the agricultural extension officers and animal health technicians are not very active in the implementation process of the project. Some of the reasons pointed out is the fact that the secondary stakeholder such as the Provincial Department of Agricultural (PDoA) to which these field officers belong is not playing active role in ensuring that they complement the efforts of other field officers such as the IDC representatives. The second reason is the fact that the participatory focus of the project was not properly communicated to the beneficiaries. This also transpired in their inability to reflect participatory practice in their relationship with the beneficiaries and other stakeholders of the project. Other challenges, among others, as pointed out in the analysis showed that participatory communication practice requires expert personnel to be successful. In the case of the project examined, apart from the fact that there is shortage of manpower to handle the challenges mentioned in the study, there is no communication expert among the few active personnel in the field. The findings of this study showed that there was no clear role and identification of responsibilities let alone coordination of all actors involved in the project. Through the selected case study, this study has not only provided avenue to explore both theoretically and practically participatory communication, but has added to participatory communication discourse that there is no easy answer to challenges field officers encounter in practice. This is the reason the different participatory practices characterising nature of the project this study has investigated was given.
|
Page generated in 0.1 seconds