Thesis (M.A.)--Trinity International University, 2003. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 152-160).

Academisch proefschrift--Amsterdam. / Bibliography: p. 136-142.

Inaug.-diss.--Jena. / Lebenslauf. "Bibliographie": p. [54].

Thesis (M.A.)--Johnson Bible College, 2000. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 78-85).

Thesis (Th. M.)--Master's Seminary, 2001. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 140-152).

Thesis (M.A.)--Wheaton College Graduate School, Wheaton, Ill., 2002. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 98-103).

Thesis (M.A.)--Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, 2003. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 140-150).

Thesis (D. Min.)--Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, 2003. / Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Colossians and Ephesians occupy an unusual position in the Pauline literature. While they are clearly influenced by the apostles theology and language, they contain ideas which many have thought to be too far distant from the theology of the non-disputed letters to be considered Pauline. We have already discussed the meaning of the with regard to the subjection of the angelic Powers. Mt this point we will examine Colossians and Ephesians in order to evaluate the context in which their authors speak of the rule of God and of Christ. It is immediately apparent that the kingdom theology of Colossians and Ephesians is strongly influenced by the general purposes of the letters. These epistles were not written in a theological void; they were directed against a particular teaching (Colossians) and for readers who feared a hostile cosmos (Ephesians). In discussing questions such as the role of realized eschatology, cosmology, and the relationship between church and kingdom in these letters we need to pay attention to the polemical aims of their writers.

No description available.