Programmatic change related to autism spectrum disorders (ASD) training in special education teacher education programs across the U.S. and institutional variables that influenced change were examined. Variables included institutions’ current coverage of autism content in coursework and institution enrollment. One faculty member from each identified institution was invited to participate in the study. Data were collected from 136 special education faculty using an exploratory survey instrument, the National Survey on ASD Preparation in Undergraduate Special Education Teacher Training Programs (NSAP). This study was designed around themes which emerged from empirical and pragmatic research findings conceptualizing prevalent issues in personnel preparation for ASD including critical knowledge and skills needed by teachers to effectively serve students with ASD. Results indicated a significant number of programmatic changes (66%) remain to be implemented in undergraduate special education programs at institutions participating in the study.

Research has shown that many of the disciplines typically included on early intervention/early childhood special education (EI/ECSE) teams receive minimal to no specialized training or coursework in EI/ECSE, and/or little emphasis or opportunity for interdisciplinary collaboration and instruction (Campbell, Chiarello, Wilcox, & Milbourne, 2009; Bruder & Dunst, 2005). As such, graduate students across IDEA related disciplines need more specific instruction and supervised experiences in collaborative service delivery, and evidenced-based social- communication interventions. The primary objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the Language and Play Everyday (LAPE) program as a model of cross-disciplinary training for graduate students in the Communication Disorders and Sciences (CDS) and Early Intervention/ Early Childhood Special Education (EIP) programs at the University of Oregon. Participants included four first-term graduate students (i.e., two from CDS; two from EIP) enrolled in the LAPE practicum during Fall 2016. Multiple outcome measures, including a pre-post competency/self-efficacy questionnaire as well as analysis of student-child interaction videos, were used to evaluate the degree to which students’ knowledge and use of child language development principles, language-enhancing strategies, and overall confidence changed throughout the 11-week practicum experience. Analysis of student-child interaction samples revealed that all students increased their use of language-enhancing strategies in group and/or individual play contexts directly following an initial LAPE training workshop, and again after an individualized coaching session. Pre-post competency and self-efficacy questionnaires indicated students made growth in both their overall confidence and knowledge of child language development and language-enhancing strategies across the 11-week practicum placement. Future recommendations include increasing opportunities for collaboration and sharing of discipline-related knowledge during training activities as well as providing continued opportunities for individualized coaching.

No description available.

An increase in the prevalence rate of autism is not necessarily matched by a concurrent increase in the rate of highly qualified special education teachers. The low ratio of highly qualified teachers to the number of students with autism has resulted in chronic teacher shortages in this area. Alternative certification is used as a mechanism to alleviate the demand for highly qualified teachers in special education. However, alternative certification routes have often left novice teachers underprepared for teaching students with autism, more specifically in the implementation of evidence-based practices necessary for instructional effectiveness. The purposes of the study were: a) to assess the knowledge of novice alternatively certified (AC) teachers in the area of autism education; and b) to determine the extent to which age, credit hours of instruction, formal hours of instruction, amount of professional development, and number of students with autism predict the variance in knowledge scores. Participants included all novice (i.e., first-and second-year) alternatively certified special education teachers in the state of Texas. Data were collected through an electronic survey instrument disseminated state-wide to approximately 33 individuals. Multiple regression was conducted in order to determine the strongest predictors of autism knowledge scores. In addition, a multi-way ANOVA was performed to identify differences between groups. The largest predictor of knowledge of autism was hours engaged in self-directed learning. Overall, AC programs in Texas need to provide basic and core content in the area of autism to increase the knowledge of novice teachers.

The increased prevalence rate of autism has immense implications for speech language pathologists (SLPs) who are directly involved in the education and service delivery for students with autism. However, few studies have documented the effectiveness of the knowledge and confidence of SLPs regarding autism. The purpose of this study was to measure the knowledge and confidence of SLPs regarding autism and the extent to which their educational and professional training prepared them to work effectively with this population. An online survey was administered to and returned by 336 SLPs nation-wide. Two multiple linear regressions were conducted to determine the variables that explained overall knowledge and confidence. The number of students with autism on one's caseload explained most of the variance. Independent sample t-test results depicted knowledge and confidence scores of SLPs who were behaviorally trained versus those who were not behaviorally trained. SLPs who were behaviorally trained had higher mean scores on measures of knowledge and confidence when compared to those without formal behavioral training. Finally, a bivariate correlation was conducted to explore the relationship between knowledge and confidence of SLPs, however, results were not statistically significant.

Some preservice special education programs (e.g., low-incidence disabilities, early childhood special education, ect.) are struggling to maintain enrollment, and often these programs are in jeopardy of being cut by their university. This session will be a roundtable discussion of what struggling programs can do to increase enrollemnt and viability.