M.Med., Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 2010

No description available.

Background: Over 700,000 patients per year undergo open-heart surgery. Healing complication rates can be up to 5% of patients who undergo this procedure, with a morbidity rate of 50% if mediastinitis supervenes. A secure and rigid fixation of surgically divided sternum is critical to avoid healing complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the yield load, construct stiffness, ultimate load, displacement at ultimate load, and post-yield behavior of three sternotomy closure methods (Peristernal wires or Sternalock titanium plates) when stressed in each of three directions: lateral distraction, rostro-caudal (longitudinal) shear distraction, and anterior-posterior (transverse) shear in a cadaveric model. Methods: Forty-two fresh cadaver models were divided into three test groups: group A, B, and C. A cardiothoracic surgeon divided each cadaveric sternum longitudinally and repaired peristernal wires or one of two Sternalock configurations. Tests were performed using a materials testing system that applied force at a constant displacement rate in a uniaxial direction until the construct catastrophically failed. Mechanical behavior was monitored using a 3D texture correlation system to create a real-time three-dimensional representation of strain directions. The resulting displacement pattern is analogous to a finite element contour plot of displacements, Lagrange Strain, or velocity. Statistical analysis was used to show the different mechanical properties of each closure method. Results: When loaded in lateral distraction, both Sternalock configurations surpassed the rigidity of peristernal wires by 600%. Some evidence was also found linking Sternalock with stiffer behavior in the rostro-caudal direction. Though not statistically significant, a trend was observed showing that constructs using the Sternalock also had higher yield loads, as well as, less post-yield displacement when compared to peristernal wires. Conclusions: Data gathered showed the superior performance of the Sternalock system in stiffness in both longitudinal distraction and rostro-caudal shear. Implications for use of the Sternalock system are faster healing times, lower complication rates, and success of the procedure.

Background and Objectives: Combined fractures of the humeral head and shaft (FHS) are rare but frequently involve an intermuscular fracture as its characteristic pattern. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate intramedullary nailed and plated FHS in terms of outcomes and complications. Materials and Methods: The present study included patients with FHS, treated via either intramedullary nailing or plating within a period of 10 years, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Functional outcome was assessed using the age- and sex-adapted Constant-Murley Score (CMS-K). Rates of complications and revision surgeries were registered. Results: Twenty-five patients (18 females, 7 males, age 60.1 ± 14.2 years, range 23-76 years) were included in the study. Nailing was performed in 16 patients (12 females, 4 males, age 62.6 ± 12.4 years), whereas plating was executed in nine patients (6 females, 3 males, age 55.8 ± 17.0 years). Follow-up among all patients was 45.1 ± 26.3 months (range 12-97 months). CMS-K was 70.3 ± 32.3 in the nailing group, with reoperation in four cases, and 76.0 ± 31.0 in the plating group, with one reoperation (p = 0.42). Patients with no metaphyseal fragment displacement (n = 19; CMS-K 76.7 ± 17.3) demonstrated significantly better functional outcomes versus those with secondary displacement of the metaphyseal fragments (n = 6; CMS-K 60.0 ± 17.1), p = 0.046. Conclusions: Comparable acceptable clinical outcome is obtained when comparing nailing with additional open cerclage or lag-screw fixation techniques versus plating with open reduction. However, a higher revision rate was observed after nailing. The correct metaphyseal fragment fixation seems to be crucial to avoid loss of reduction and hence the need for revision surgery, as well as a worse outcome.