This dissertation reports on a qualitative study of school leadership with nine secondary-school headteachers (of maintained schools) or principals (of academy-type schools) in England. The project maps schooling provision and offers an empirical account of leaders’ identities and practices in neoliberal and neoconservative times. Informed by a critical policy-scholarship methodology, documentary data from primary and secondary sources supplement narrative and semi-structured interviews conducted over 18 months. The findings are reported in five journal articles and one book chapter. The first output maps school types through different lenses: legal status; curriculum; selection; types of academy; and school groupings. The mapping highlights the intersections between the reform agenda and historical diversity. I conceptualise the landscape holistically through locus of legitimacy and branding, arguing that diversification policies facilitate corporatised and religious interests. Second, I show how UTCs and studio schools construct children’s abilities as fixed and differentiable in terms of predicted economic value. They select, but the responsibility for this, following Bourdieu, is transferred discursively from the school through branding and habitus to the “consumers” where it is to be misrecognised as exercising ‘school choice’. Third, I typologise three effects on heads’ and principals’ agency and identities of a few elite multi-academy trust principals, or courtiers, who have won regional empires through expanding their academy chains to occupy the spaces opened up by the dismantling of LAs. Public-sector and school-leader identities and histories permit the promotion of their activities as “school led” and downplays their close relationship with central-state policy makers and private-sector networks. Fourth, I argue that corporatised leadership in schools in England is being promoted through new actors and new types of school. Corporatised leadership is characterised inter alia by the promotion of business interests and the adoption of business-derived leadership practices and identities. I use Bourdieu’s concept of field to explain the impact of business on educational leadership and the dissonance between leaders and led. Fifth, I argue with Gunter that school leaders are removing those who embody or vocalise alternative conceptualisations of educator by eradicating ‘inadequate’ teaching,and implementing the leader’s ‘vision’. We deploy Arendtian thinking to show how current models of school leadership enable totalitarian practices to become ordinary. Sixth, I develop Bourdieu’s concept of hysteresis through narratives from two heads to argue that rather than simply being an effect of change, hysteresis may be an actively sought outcome whereby the state intervenes to deprivilege welfarist headteachers and privilege corporatised principals through structurally facilitating their habitus and mandating its dispositions for the field. Collectively, these findings demonstrate how the diversification of provision in England and the demands of a performative, marketised regime have ontological and professional stakes for school leaders and for the led. Symbolic and economic capital is accruing to the capitalised, facilitated by corporate practices and corporate structural solutions through acquisitions and alliances. Resistance is possible, but a dissident habitus limits standing in the field. This hierarchisation is reflected in the relationship between school types and in how children are meant to self-select into that provision. This is a landscape constituted of positions, where pupils are expected to know their place and the purpose of education is to facilitate social segregation for economic efficiency.

“Exploring the Impact and Roles that Strategic Government Leadership Plays in the Adoption and Use of eHealth in Low Resource Countries: A Quantitative and Descriptive Study of the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria as a Health Regulatory Agency”. MSc eHealth Defense Candidate: Victor Gbenro Governments of low resource countries (LRCs) have embraced and leveraged the potential benefits Information Computer Technology (ICT) brings to the healthcare sector, taking various steps to adopt and use eHealth to improve healthcare delivery despite recognized challenges. LRCs have been identified as most challenged with the implementation of policies that can drive the development of critical sectors. Despite the development of policies and frameworks in these countries, many still struggle to deliver on their health goals. It is yet to be fully understood to what extent professional health regulatory agencies (PHRAs) understand their roles in effective regulation, as it would relate to medical education, professional conduct and registration of practitioners. The Healthcare workforce is one of the core building blocks of any health system and the regulation of the workforce is central to the provision of quality healthcare services. PHRAs provide strategic leadership through existing legislation, policies, and frameworks and are themselves adopting the use of ICT in a range of applications. These include the registration and licensure process of practitioners, and training and retraining of practitioners through continuing professional development activities. In 2016, the Nigerian government approved the implementation of it National ICT Strategic Framework for health and empowered its agency, the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) which is an agency in the ministry of communication to provide the required leadership, governance, and stewardship in coordinating and improve upon the use of ICT in all key sectors of the country. This study was undertaken to understand the role PHRAs like the Medical and Dental Council of Nigeria (MDCN) a regulatory body for the professions of medicine and dentistry in Nigeria provides Strategic Government Leadership (SGL) in the adoption and use of eHealth tools through policies and legislation in the health sector. The study also assessed the knowledge and perception of employees of the (MDCN) on existing eHealth policies and legislation and of their relevancy or adequacies in providing effective regulation. The study answers the research questions i) does a relationship exist between SGL and capacity for eHealth innovation and technological/ infrastructural development? ii) What are the measures taken and the importance of the security and privacy of practitioner records to PHRA? and iii) Does SGL, as demonstrated through policy development, affect the adoption and use of eHealth by employees of the PHRA? A systematic literature review was performed, and a structured questionnaire was administered to MDCN professional staff. The results were subjected to statistical analysis to investigate relationships between the dependent variable (SGL) and 14 independent variables representing the 15 constructs from the questionnaire. A regression model found four significant predictors of the value of the dependent variable. A study of other related PHRAs is recommended to improve the suitability of the framework proposed, considering the limitations of this study. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc)

No description available.

No description available.